The Catholics can have authoritative teachings because they have Apostolic Succession. The Pope is the heir of the Apostles in a direct line, and what he says is the official doctrine.
But if you believe in the priesthood of all believers and justification through faith alone, it's kind of hard to keep out heretics, particularly antinominians.
I didn't realize there was a movement to take down the cross. I've moved around a bit, and been shocked to see some "churches" with no cross or religious trappings at all. I think the article makes a valid point, it's time for more denominations to stand for what they believe in. The moral relativism that's creeping into Churches is frightening. I'm not above there being some changes as time goes on, but there need to be boundaries. Some things just are, and always will be, wrong.
Good luck Adam, many good men have tried. To this day the wheat and tares are still growing together in the same field.
Once you get rid of the people who deny the basics of the Faith ... we have to get together and talk, really dialogue about issues, determine what matters and what doesn't.
There you go. Brilliant idea. Get rid of the people who disagree with you and then discuss the issues you have in common.
Perhaps we can burn a few heretics at the stake, too. That'll help.
I'm Catholic, and I love Protestant Conservatives who have kept un-Catholic "Catholic" Politicians out of the White House. Thank for upholding Christian values! God Bless you.
We don't need to take the Catholic approach when our approach is superior. No one is going to feel the Holy Spirit in a Church that teaches that Jesus was a swell guy but not the only path to God. This is why the mainline Protestant Churches are declining while the evangelical Churches are thriving.
My Serbian Orthodox priest said that any "church" that does not teach the Resurrection should be called a CLUB, not a church.
By the way, I am an ELCA Lutheran who attends a Serbian Orthodox church once a month. And I am fed up with what's happening to the ELCA due to the depredations of feminazis, "gays", and revisionists.
Kind of agree.
We all have some house cleaning to do.
ping for an interesting read--perhaps we should copy it to Bryant?
You might want to check out a new book by some guy named RUTZ it's called "Megashift"He has research indicating huge growth in churches in third world countries that is basically off the radar because it does not come under the umbrella of any "recognized" Christian mission groups. Inotherwards these are indiginous church planters who are being very sucessful. And the only Bible they know is a very simple understanding of the New Testament just like the church in the Book of Acts. Since they have not been to seminary or effected by what German theologians etc. have been saying about literarary criticism, etc. They just preach Jesus saves. Rutz says this group will eventually outnumber mainline Christians. I wonder if that 51% of Methodist will see them coming?
Kind of exciting development methinks!
The Methodists seem to have reached a majority consensus.
Definitely. It's actually difficult for me to imagine a person claiming to be a Christian answering "No" to this question. I guess they are out there though..
As a New England Episcopalian, I'm a bit surprized to read that only 31% don't believe in the Resurrection -- based on my experience with Massachusetts so-called "pastors," I'd say over half don't believe in Jesus, even to the extent that Muslims do (and Muslims hold that He was a prophet, but only a man).
I would say 31% are overtly atheistic or agnostic. So why are they there, if they have no faith? Being a priest is a pretty good job, I guess.
d.o.l.
Criminal Number 18F