Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: franksolich
"...the law is that one has to establish beyond a doubt where he entered the United States--which generally means a document (stamped passport, whatnot) showing that."

May I repeat - absent that "small detail" < /sarcasm >, those cases, IMO, should never have a US court docket assignment.

17 posted on 05/02/2005 6:52:04 AM PDT by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: azhenfud

Right; and I agree.

No legitimate entry, no "rights."

That is after all the law.

But who the Hades is bothering with enforcing the law?

This reminds me of when the Clinton-Hillary administration was pushing for more gun-laws, and an assistant Attorney General, when questioned how many had been prosecuted for illegal possession of firearms under the old law, alleged "none" had been, much to his embarrassment; the Department of Justice had not been enforcing the old law.

The laws are on the books.

We should use them, instead of passing more "feel good" laws. We should demand that our desk-sitting broad-bottomed bureaucrats do the work for which they are very well paid.


18 posted on 05/02/2005 6:58:18 AM PDT by franksolich (oh, it's just a prefix, a minor detail, can't be important)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson