Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N.Y. may lose two seats in House (2010 reapportionment)
Syracuse Post-Standard ^ | 4/21/05 | Peter Lyman

Posted on 04/21/2005 12:52:48 PM PDT by Ravi

New York faces the prospect of losing two seats in the House of Representatives after the 2010 census, according to projections to be released today by the U.S. Census Bureau.

New York's population is projected to grow during the next five years, but at a rate far slower than states in the South and West, the Census Bureau reports. Florida is expected to pass New York as the third most populous state, behind California and Texas.

"We're still a big state, but it does hurt us, no doubt," said Robert Spitzer, professor of political science at the State University College at Cortland.

Not only will New York's congressional seats be reduced from 29 to 27, if projections hold, but New York will lose two votes in the Electoral College from 31 to 29. It is too early to speculate on the impact on individual House members, Spitzer said. There will be three congressional elections between now and the next redistricting, and the cast of characters in the New York delegation could change dramatically in the next six years. N.Y., PAGE A-11

(Excerpt) Read more at syracuse.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2010; census; congress; newyork; reapportionment; representative
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
What a shame.
1 posted on 04/21/2005 12:52:49 PM PDT by Ravi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ravi

GOOD.


2 posted on 04/21/2005 12:54:11 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ravi

Give one back to MS!


3 posted on 04/21/2005 12:54:50 PM PDT by Sybeck1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ravi
Saw it coming for years.

On the bright side, it's 2 less EC votes for Mrs. Clinton.

4 posted on 04/21/2005 12:55:13 PM PDT by b4its2late (Being "over the hill" is much better than being under it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ravi
Yeah, take Rangel's seat away from him.


5 posted on 04/21/2005 12:55:16 PM PDT by rdb3 (To the world, you're one person. To one person, you may be the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ravi

That noise you hear is power sliding to the red states...


6 posted on 04/21/2005 12:56:26 PM PDT by WinOne4TheGipper (Democratic Underground- where dim wits go to be impressed by the intellect of half wits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
take Rangel's seat away from him.

Almost impossible. I think he's crazy glued to it....

7 posted on 04/21/2005 12:56:40 PM PDT by b4its2late (Being "over the hill" is much better than being under it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

It'll have no affect on Hillary's 2008 run. The electoral college votes will be the same as the ones that were used in 2004.


8 posted on 04/21/2005 12:57:51 PM PDT by WinOne4TheGipper (Democratic Underground- where dim wits go to be impressed by the intellect of half wits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

yeah and take Nadler the Hutt's seat too - that is probably like 4 seats alone!


9 posted on 04/21/2005 12:58:14 PM PDT by DM1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

Nevada, Arizona, Florida, Texas and Utah are the fastest growing states. Arizona and North Carolina will move in to the top ten states. Michigan and New Jersey will fall out of the top ten. Hmmm...which ones are red states and which ones are blue?


10 posted on 04/21/2005 12:58:18 PM PDT by Ravi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ravi

Sounds good in theory, but remember how Congressional seats are drawn-up. That is where election rigging really takes place.

Look for a fierce re-districting battle after the 2010 census.


11 posted on 04/21/2005 12:58:50 PM PDT by PetroniDE (We Don't Live in Texas Anymore --- State Name is Now TAXES !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ravi
Yep. And as soon as possible, I'm outta NY.....
12 posted on 04/21/2005 1:01:31 PM PDT by b4its2late (Being "over the hill" is much better than being under it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: WinOne4TheGipper
Oh yeah, that's right.

Damn.

Oh well, it was a nice thought until you burst the bubble..... LOL!!!!

13 posted on 04/21/2005 1:02:56 PM PDT by b4its2late (Being "over the hill" is much better than being under it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ravi
What a shame.

Just remember that the state legislatures are the ones who redraw lines. I have a feeling that it won't be Charlie Rangel or his ilk being drawn out of a seat in NY. Better chance that the most conservative Republican will be looking at a primary fight with another Republican.

Our local paper ran a story today that Kentucky will be losing one as well.

Texas and Florida are supposed to be the big gainers. I think it said each would gain about 8 or 9 seats. Can we say emerging Hispanic influence in Congress?

14 posted on 04/21/2005 1:06:37 PM PDT by Bluegrass Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ravi

Too bad they can't lose two Senate seats.


15 posted on 04/21/2005 1:07:06 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (Mindless BushBot and FristFan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bluegrass Conservative

Maybe we can redistrict out the one Dem from Kentucky's delegation.


16 posted on 04/21/2005 1:21:03 PM PDT by Ravi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ravi
Maybe we can redistrict out the one Dem from Kentucky's delegation.

That will definitely be the goal. The GOP has a pretty solid lock on the State Senate right now and has made significant gains in the State House. The "shhhh, don't tell" goal of the Republican Party of Kentucky right now is to have both chambers firmly in GOP control by 2010, so that we can draw the new district lines.

17 posted on 04/21/2005 1:24:48 PM PDT by Bluegrass Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ravi

If Eliot spitzer gets elected Governor in 2006, make that more like 4 seats!


18 posted on 04/21/2005 1:32:40 PM PDT by Gritty ("Quoting from DU is like going to an insane asylum and writing down the things you hear-M Bowers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bluegrass Conservative
Texas and Florida are supposed to be the big gainers. I think it said each would gain about 8 or 9 seats. Can we say emerging Hispanic influence in Congress?

That seems a bit excessive! The numbers I saw had FL and TX each gaining 3 seats.

19 posted on 04/21/2005 1:33:18 PM PDT by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bluegrass Conservative; Ravi; All

Here's a link to a PDF showing the latest 2010 apportionment projection from Polidata:

http://www.polidata.org/census/st004nca.pdf


20 posted on 04/21/2005 1:36:32 PM PDT by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson