Posted on 04/12/2005 7:19:09 AM PDT by Valin
Although the media would never admit it, House Judiciary Committee Chairman James Sensenbrenner (R-WI) is on the verge of his second-straight significant triumph for common sense over both antiquated pre-9/11 holdovers in the law and the notoriously nutty Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Incorrectly tagged an immigration bill by Democrats and the media, Sensenbrenners REAL ID legislation, which includes language setting basic minimum standards for issuance of drivers licenses, is just weeks away from making it to the books. Ironically, the only thing that may derail the security provisions is if the Senate succeeds in adding on immigration amendments this week.
After suffering the defeat of his quest to keep drivers licenseswhich can be used for boarding planes, among other thingsout of the hands of illegal aliens (and terrorists) last December, Sensenbrenner wasted no time in holding House leadership to its commitment to bring REAL ID to a vote. As stand-alone legislation, it sailed through the House this February by a margin of 261-161.
The bills centerpiece, establishing national minimum standards for licenses, is intentionally not immigration-related. It would not prohibit drivers licenses for illegalsas long as those licenses are clearly distinguishable from those for citizens and legal residents and cannot be used as federal identification. Handing out regular licenses to people based on easily-forgeable foreign documents is, to put it kindly, risky.
Though the media has focused solely on the drivers license provisions, the legislation tackles a number of other serious shortcomings in the law.
Probably most important is that it would make the standards for deporting someone deemed a potential security threat the same as for keeping that same person out of the country in the first place. Giving potential terrorists greater benefit of the doubt simply because we learned of the threat posed only after theyre on U.S. soil is a double standard that makes no sense post-9/11.
What Sensenbrenners bill would do is lower the standards for deportation to equal those for inadmissibility into the country. In other words, if someone could have been denied a visa out of security concerns, that person would now be deportable on those same grounds.
True to his feisty nature, Sensenbrenner has once again taken aim at goofy decisions by the Ninth Circuit. The black robes on the left coast, however, have made this fight inevitable by turning asylum law on its head.
America should take pride in serving as refuge for millions from around the world fleeing persecution, but the asylum system is meant only for the truly deserving. Because almost anyone is free to seek asylum, it practically invites exploitation.
Asylum judges have been denied one of the most effective devices for ferreting out frauds and phoniesand terrorists. Various Ninth Circuit decisions have made it near-impossible for a judge to deny asylum based on the grounds that the applicant does not appear credible.
Juries are supposed to weigh the credibility of all witnesses in reaching a verdict, but yet professionals whove spent sometimes decades honing their craft, which includes reading people, are prohibited in the Ninth Circuit from performing this basic function.
The Ninth Circuit has also made it extremely difficult for a judge to deny asylum because the applicant has failed to provide any corroborating evidence, or other proof to back up a claim. REAL ID would allow a judge to do so if he believes it is reasonable to expect the asylum-seeker to provide some.
All these provisions could become law in the near future, as the House attached REAL ID to a must-pass supplemental spending bill. The only stumbling block is that Sen. Larry Craig (R-ID) wants to add an actual immigration-related amendment to the spending bill, which the Senate is slated to take up this week.
According to various Hill sources, Craig wants to offer an amnesty for illegal aliens who spend at least six years in agriculture. It probably would pass the Senate, but its strongly opposed in the House. The likely end result would be a compromise in the conferencewhere the two chambers reconcile the differences in legislationin which the Senate drops Craigs immigration amendment and the House drops Sensenbrenners security provisions.
Knowing Sensenbrenners track record, however, the safe money is on the steely Wisconsin lawmaker. When he failed to win on his drivers license proposals last December, the media claimed he had been defeated. What they missed were several key victories on security measures that Democrats bitterly opposed, including making it easier to prosecute material support for terrorism and to track so-called lone wolf terrorists.
And if he wins once again, so do we.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joel Mowbray is author of Dangerous Diplomacy: How the State Department Threatens Americas Security.
Ping.
It's more than just Larry Craig's shamnesty, the Senate is preparing to give away the whole store. That body is so out of touch with its own constituents that the time may come when the House of Lords is abolished out of popular demand.
All of this police state national id in disguise crap is just that, pure crap. The place to stop illegals is at the border. Leave me TF alone.
That body is so out of touch with its own constituents that the time may come when the House of Lords is abolished out of popular demand.
1 I don't necessarily DISagree with you. They are "out of touch(IMO)
2 It's not going to be abolished..never gonna happen
3 Given #2, what are you going to do about it? Remember he get the government we want.
I heard a speech by Jim Wallis the other night (YES I know he's a big time lefty) (I paraphrase) "Washington if full of politicans who wet their finger and stick it up to see which way the wind is blowing. We're never going to change anything by sending more wet fingered pols to Washington, WE NEED TO CHANGE THE WIND."
That's part of the success of the Minutemen in Arizona right now...they are changing the wind direction all the way back in Washington, D.C.
Sensenbrenner BUMP
That's part of the success of the Minutemen in Arizona right now
ONLY if it lasts and spreads and keeps the loony toons on a short leach. What concerns me is this may be just another "a really futile and stupid gesture".
If that were true then the Senate wouldn't be voting on massive amnesties since they know the public is overwhelmingly against them.
What I tend to believe is they're bought and paid for by lobbies. Larry Craig is only a Senator in name, he's a lobbyist who happens to be a politician.
What I'd like to see is for the public to stop electing career politicians and make government citizen legislatures where we put in only those who regularly come from the communities of the people they serve. I know that's probably not going to happen either anytime soon since the lobbyists have the money.
We already have one, it's called a Social Security card. Try and do anything w/o one.
Have you gotten in touch with Sensenbrenner?
Our government sure is out of touch with the voters. The deserive for more and more illegal aliens, all of them criminals, defies comprehension. The only explanations I can come up with for it is: treason (enemy agents or enablers), corruption (bribes, blackmail, other personal gain), mental illness, and/or deep hatred for this country.
Well said. Succinct and correct.
The AAMVA is nothing but a front for insurance companies run by authentic Nazi wannabes.
Stop the foreign invasion ~ NOW!
Be Ever Vigilant!
There's no end to it either, the more people complain the more politicians do for the illegals.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.