Posted on 04/08/2005 11:10:27 AM PDT by RedBeaconNY
Hey FReepers- I am a sophomore in high school. For English class, I have to write a debatable paper, and I have chosen to write on the various negative effects of homosexuality and the homosexual movement on American society. I was wondering if you could direct me towards some credible sources on the subject- including a list of laws passed for/against homosexuality, opinions, stats, etc. Your opinions are welcome too- all's fair in an opinionative paper ;) Thank.
It could happen. There's a kid (zerointelligence.net) who wrote a speech about how he was bullied in school and now he's up for an explusion hearing.
You can have a field day on this website:
http://www.exodusglobalalliance.org/
Testimonies on those who TURNED straight by CHOICE and they mention the MOLESTATION that lead them into the homo life. It's interesting.
How about Clintons "don't ask, don't tell in the military?
"Hate crime" legislation?
Look up Matthew Shepherd and see how they were punished for his death when they DID NOT seek him out BECAUSE he was a homosexual!
Exploiting Matthew Shepard
AIM Report ^ | December 22, 2004 | By Cliff Kincaid
Posted on 12/28/2004 5:07:36 PM PST by DirtyHarryY2K
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1309843/posts
You know there must be something happening when the New York Times praises ABC News for running "an intellectually brave episode" of the "20/20" show that has angered the homosexual lobby. That means the Times found it convincing, and so did we. In the November 27 show, "20/20" uncovered the truth about the 1998 murder of Matthew Shepard, widely depicted as a hate crime because he was a homosexual. Almost everything we were told about this murder at the time by ABC, the Times and every other major news organization was FALSE.
More here: http://www.aim.org/media_monitor/2331_0_2_0_C/
Accuracy in Media wrote this piece. Did the main stream liberal media mention it anywhere?
NOOOOOO!
Lots of good stuff here:
You will feast out on these links. It debunks homosexuality and mentions the impact on society.
Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1026551/posts
Myth and Reality about Homosexuality--Sexual Orientation Section, Guide to Family Issues"
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1034938/posts
Actually, you're about the only person here I have harsh bitter feelings about. Now you can keep the fued going or you can shut up and show some maturity. I'll set an example for you............
You are welcome -after 7 years most would get a clue. :)
Thanks-- I hadn't even noticed the sniping at("discredited psychologist"?!) Cameron. I was looking for a good example of a bad example when I included the homosexual links-- I succeeded because they also have incorrect information on homosexuality even.
It's a passionate issue. This stuff has a lot to do with things ranging from individual self worth to the future existence of the human race. Then again that would point to an even greater need to hang on to reality and lay off the personal attacks.
I can imagine having someone like myself point out your true feelings towards Jim Robinson and other freepers like myself would cause you some grief. But you are who you are, and people need to know from where you're coming.
As I previously said, it's not healthy for you to harbor such harsh feelings and with your previous bypass, it's just a bad idea.
Now you can keep the fued going or you can shut up and show some maturity. I'll set an example for you............
You keep trying to change the subject. I'm sorry if it bothers you to have your own words put on display for all to see. Unfortunately, as usual, you brought this on yourself with your post 123.
At this time you have no credibility here. Please show some maturity and either support or retract your statements.
You're asking something of her she can't possibly deliver. She started at the very beginning as a troll supporting homosexuality on a thread asking for "The Negatives Of Homosexuality on Society". When pointed out by DBeers the FR policy against promoting the homosexual agenda, as usual, the best she could offer was a smug/punk response that she "knows" the rules...and apparently knows she's breaking them.
All she' can do is snipe at you like an 8 year old bully on the playground who pulls the girls hair when the teacher has his back turned.
She's pathetic and incapable of any real substance, why bother?
damn.... those are some compelling stats.
I find you rather annoying. Your silence would be appreciated.
I am helping my little 2nd grader with HIS project, that DOES include a diorama, this weekend! ROFL!
For the sophomore: I am sorry, but I believe there have probably always been homosexuals and probably always will be. I believe the liberal gay agenda coupled with the current anti-Christian bent of the mainstream media are very harmful to society. However, I have no problem with allowing gays to live decent, family-oriented lives, and consider THESE homosexuals to be a welcome addition to the world. I am against the open promiscuity of both heteros and homos, which my children have to see all around them.
Yea, I had to get one for a colonoscopy and its not much fun
You're welcome. There's a lot of false information floating around about Paul Cameron, which is all pushed by two homosexual activists Mark Pietrzyk and Andrew Sullivan.
I realize asking him to support his arguments is a complete waste of time, but you ask a good question... Perhaps I bother for the lurkers. That, and he gives me another chance to get the truth out there.
I first engaged him when he was constantly posting a long list of research links on every thread about homosexuals.
I read the first two links and pointed out to him why the research findings were false and/or the method flawed in accordance with scientific standards of research. I gave himn a brief primer on those standards and suggested he educate himself, since he was so determined to post research.
His response was to ignore what I told him about the research he posted and challenged me to post counter research findings. His challenge was a deflection from the point that he was excoriating all homosexuals by posting false research. And he assumed that there was counter research for each of his links. If he was interested in truth he would have acknowledged the problems with his links.
At that point I realized he didn't give a damn about truth he was merely in the mudslinging business and intended to indulge in emotional zealotry.
scripter and his disciples want to paint anyone who disagrees with them as pro-homosexual agenda. They ignore the fact that those people may not support homosexual curriculuum, NAMBLA, sex with children, flamboyant public displays and the like. If anyone here whispers a positive word about homosexuals, they are accused of supporting the agenda. As I have done and will contiue to do, I support the rights of homosexuals as individual US citizens and taxpayers and I post examples of people I know who are good, productive and not radical. This is what makes the zealots mad.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.