Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Does Islam Improve on Christianity?
The American Thinker ^ | April 2, 2005 | James Arlandson

Posted on 04/02/2005 11:38:43 AM PST by quidnunc

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last
To: AmericanDave

No, Jesus is God the Son, He has always been with God the Father and the Holy Spirit. His ministry began with the Creation.
Buddah is just some guy that lived then died.


41 posted on 04/02/2005 1:11:32 PM PST by protest1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mogollon
Matthew 24:24 - For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets...,

Bible quotes are tricky on these threads-- we're either editing the Sacred Text or flaming the FR (both of which are forbidden).  Your excerpt of Mathew 24 stops with the two verses that say not to believe false prophets.  That's the easy part and I usually like to stop there too.   The hard part is the next thirty some verses that say to keep your eyes and ears open for the real ones.

42 posted on 04/02/2005 1:15:05 PM PST by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama
Abraham made no prophecies. God made promises to him, if that is what you are referring to, although they never saw fulfillment under Moses (you might be able to claim they were fulfilled under Joshua but these were not the Messianic prophecies, they were promises made regarding the land).

The prophets came after Moses and foretold of the Messiah. Christians see fulfillment of these prophecies in Jesus Christ. There are no prophecies for Islam to fulfill as the only prophecies made in the New Testament deal with the end times, not a future prophet.

And no, most Israelites did not become Christians, and most Christians did not become Muslims. Where on Earth did you get your info?

43 posted on 04/02/2005 1:15:41 PM PST by Fatalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
I long studied comparative religion.  Books on my shelves include the Avesta of Zarathustra, the Desatir, the Upadeshasahasri, Ashtavakra Samhita,  Dhammapada, Te-Tao Ching, Chuang-Tzu, the works of Mencius and Confucius, several versions of the Bible and Apocrypha, etc...

And, at one time, there was a copy of the Koran in my collection.  I say "was" because I became so disgusted when reading it, I closed it about half way through and dropped it in the garbage.

And that was before 9-11.

The only other book I've thrown away like that was Mein Kampf.

Boiled down to their root messages, Mein Kampf and the Koran preach the same hatred for mankind.

Even an agnostic such as myself knows that the question "Does Islam Improve On Christianity" is, on it's face, so absurd as to be unworthy of serious consideration.

 

44 posted on 04/02/2005 1:21:42 PM PST by Psycho_Bunny (“I know a great deal about the Middle East because I’ve been raising Arabian horses" Patrick Swazey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

Islam is terribly inconsistent. Firstly, Mohammed and Islam admit the Bible, both Old and New Testaments are divinely inspired, but then denies the claims of the New Testament as to the Divinity, Crucifixion, Atonement and Resurrection of Christ.


45 posted on 04/02/2005 1:23:40 PM PST by Fiat volvntas tva (I believe in order that I may understand. (St. Augustine))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Oh the irony... this is what Christianity does to Judaism.

How exactly is that accomplished?

46 posted on 04/02/2005 1:28:28 PM PST by Fiat volvntas tva (I believe in order that I may understand. (St. Augustine))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ventana

Islam improves NOTHING--it is a cult of death.


47 posted on 04/02/2005 1:31:11 PM PST by bfree (Liberals are evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
I guess I had the term wrong. The replacement of the new covenant for the old seemed naturally describable as "replacement theology", but I guess that term has a different meaning.

That's okay because it seems entirely logical. But once you turn to the texts of the Torah and the New Testament, you'd quickly find that no such replacement occurs. Christian texts don't "replace" anything. But they do fulfill them. In fact, you can't even have a New Testament without the Old, for you would have nothing to compare and/or validate the New.

God's promises to Abraham, thus Israel, are valid today as they were when they were written. Replacement Theology teaches that God is completely finished with Israel and the Jews. This, then, would make God out to be a liar.

Check here for more info: Replacement Theology


48 posted on 04/02/2005 1:31:57 PM PST by rdb3 (To the world, you're one person. To one person, you may be the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama
There's 2 Billion Christians and only 1.3 billion Muslims so your a little off. And the Koran changes a lot of the old testament and really screws up the life of Jesus. Christians don't change a thing of the old testament.
49 posted on 04/02/2005 1:32:34 PM PST by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Not quite. "Replacement Theology" is the literal "replacing" of Israel with the Church.

"Replacement Theology" is a perjorative term created by Dispensationalists as a misnomer for Covenant Theology. There is no "replacement" of Israel with the Church in Covenant Theology, that is a myth created by Dispensationalists. In Covenant Theology Israel is not "replaced", it's expanded to include Jews and Gentiles.

50 posted on 04/02/2005 1:35:58 PM PST by Fiat volvntas tva (I believe in order that I may understand. (St. Augustine))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Fiat volvntas tva
Islam is terribly inconsistent. Firstly, Mohammed and Islam admit the Bible, both Old and New Testaments are divinely inspired, but then denies the claims of the New Testament as to the Divinity, Crucifixion, Atonement and Resurrection of Christ.

Christianity is inconsistent. First it admits the Old Testament is divinely inspired then denies most of the laws of God as described in the Book of Leviticus.

51 posted on 04/02/2005 1:37:30 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
The replacement of the new covenant for the old seemed naturally describable as "replacement theology", but I guess that term has a different meaning.

Actually, your use of the term is accurate whereas the Dispensationalist use isn't.

"Replacement Theology" is a pejorative term created by Dispensationalists for Covenant Theology which is the expansion of Israel to include Gentiles into the Church.

52 posted on 04/02/2005 1:39:09 PM PST by Fiat volvntas tva (I believe in order that I may understand. (St. Augustine))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
The koran also teaches to hide in a ditch or behind a tree and kill the Christians and Jews. This is peace?
53 posted on 04/02/2005 1:42:18 PM PST by mountainlyons (alienated vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
First it admits the Old Testament is divinely inspired then denies most of the laws of God as described in the Book of Leviticus.

No, Christians do not deny the Levitical Law, we recognize the context those laws were given. Many of the civil laws are still in practice and are incorporated in our legal system of today. The ceremonial laws were for the old covenant and pointed to Messiah. Messiah fulfilled those laws, thus they are no longer applicable.

54 posted on 04/02/2005 1:44:24 PM PST by Fiat volvntas tva (I believe in order that I may understand. (St. Augustine))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

What do I win?

55 posted on 04/02/2005 1:44:53 PM PST by Critter (America, home of the whipped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TalBlack

It's a tough cross to bear ;)


56 posted on 04/02/2005 1:47:23 PM PST by thoughtomator ("The Passion of the Opus" - 2 hours of a FReeper being crucified on his own self-pitying thread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

No, it simply says that the Law has been fulfilled and thus no longer applies. Whether you agree with that belief or not, it never denies that the Law was indeed handed down by God.


57 posted on 04/02/2005 1:47:24 PM PST by Fatalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
An improvment ?? I want to laugh Wherever it goes Islam brings with it many delightful and preached customs ; child marriages, female circumcisions, rabid hypocritical hatred toward Christians, Hindus, Jews, Buddhists and every other non-muslim, terrorism and support for terrorism and a virulent intolerance of all other faiths.
58 posted on 04/02/2005 1:47:50 PM PST by Fast1 (Destroy America buy Chinese goods,Shop at Wal-Mart 3/18/05 American was gone when I woke up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Here is Replacement Theology as defined by Jesus Himself:

Matthew 26:27-29

27Then He took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, "Drink from it, all of you. 28For this is My blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins. 29But I say to you, I will not drink of this fruit of the vine from now on until that day when I drink it new with you in My Father's kingdom."

59 posted on 04/02/2005 1:50:32 PM PST by Fiat volvntas tva (I believe in order that I may understand. (St. Augustine))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Fatalist
most Israelites did not become Christians, and most Christians did not become Muslims. Where on Earth did you get your info?

Good census data for the period 1 AD to 700 AD is hard to come by.  Just the same, there was once a time that most of them that considered the Ten Commandments to be sacred were Jews, and later most of those guys were Christians.  I realize that some say a Jew is not a Christian and a Christian is not a Jew.   I'd argue that you can't be true to the Torah and deny Christ, and that to be a Christian you can't just chuck the old Testament.   Sort of like  "If you believed Moses, you would believe me, for he wrote about me".

During the first half millennium, there were five major cities with bishops- Rome, Constantinople, Antioch, Jerusalem, and Alexandria.  All but one spoke Greek (the language of the Gospels) and Latin was the home language of just the Roman church.  Since then, four out of five went for Islam.   Of course, during the past half millennium something really deferent's seemed to have happened that's changed everything, but I digress.

60 posted on 04/02/2005 2:00:16 PM PST by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson