Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Terri Schiavo case is rousing the moderates
The Hill ^ | March 30, 2005 | Dick Morris

Posted on 03/31/2005 4:53:58 AM PST by billorites

The scene is familiar to anyone with a nodding acquaintance with American politics — prayer vigils, demonstrations, talk-radio hosts obsessing, the Christian right closing in. But in the terrible tragedy of Terri Schiavo, the center is joining the debate with a ferocity usually reserved for the right.

As in most social debates, the moderates have the majority, but, unlike discussions over abortion or gay marriage, in this debate they also match the intensity of their conservative critics.

Most of us will never have an abortion. We are either too male, too old, too inactive or too moral. The life/choice debate is, for us, a bit of a spectator sport. So is the focus on gay marriage. We may care about the issue, but, as Clinton would often put it, we don’t have a dog in that hunt.

But we will all die — and don’t we know it! We can all see ourselves at the wrong end of a feeding tube, sucking out sustenance to sustain a life we might more willingly forfeit. We can not only put ourselves in the place of those most intimately concerned with Schiavo’s fate — her husband and parents — but we can put ourselves right there in the bed, in a coma — which the doctors call a “persistent vegetative state” — with no hope and no life worth living.

A recent poll by the New York Post showed that, while two-thirds of Americans favor the removal of Terri’s feeding tube, more than 80 percent would want their own tube to be removed were they similarly situated. Schiavo is not just a political issue to those who advocate terminating her life support. She is our worst personal nightmare.

To those who oppose the right-to-life position, the political intervention by state and federal legislators and executives, is, truly, the most intrusive example of the very big governmental excesses that the political right decries.

One can well understand the passion of the pro-lifers on the issue of abortion. They have a fetus to protect. For them, the commitment to preserving life carries into the womb. We may not agree, but we can certainly respect and empathize with their view.

But with Schiavo, there is no fetus. There is just Terri. And when we put ourselves in her place, more than 80 percent of us think we would want to die. To be told that we must linger in a non-life because of the dictates of a governor wedded to the religious right and a Congress in the grip of ideologically driven leaders seems to the vast majority of us a level of government interference we find too intrusive to tolerate.

Next to a decision that we must live as vegetables, OSHA regulations, IRS bullying and EPA stubbornness pale by comparison. How ironic that, at the precise moment when most of us are prepared to embrace the agenda of the libertarian conservatives, we find the Republican Party, their supposed champions, running screaming in the other direction.

Politically, the Schiavo case will hurt the Republican Party, but the damage will soon fade. The president has stepped lightly on the issue, and his popularity and effectiveness will not be affected. But Gov. Jeb Bush (R-Fla.) better look for a new line of work. The right is mad at him for not standing in the hospice door. The center is furious at his butting in where most Americans, and Floridians, feel he has no right to be. Only the left is overjoyed to see a possible presidential contender caught in the crossfire.

Jeb is showing that he lacks George’s ability to dance and duck. We elected Bush Sr. knowing he was once pro-choice, proof that he was no fanatic. We chose Bush Jr. because he let us know, early in the campaign, that he would not spend his presidency relitigating — literally or figuratively — Roe v. Wade, however abortion offended his sense of right and wrong. He made clear he had other, higher priorities.

But by taking a doctrinaire position and then backing off it, Jeb Bush has shown us that he would charge where others would tread with caution. Too bad. We might have needed him to stop Hillary.

Morris is the author of Rewriting History, a rebuttal of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s (D-N.Y.) memoir, Living History.


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: dickmorris; jebbush; schiavo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-157 next last
To: mware; Howlin
First they came for the Jews and we said nothing.......

ChoiceNazi

And all the times they've called me a "moderate?" Thank God for that!

We don't call them The Unappeasables for nothing, kiddo.

I'd like to hurt him

This thread is testament to the fact that "social conservatives" can never be appeased enough to be counted on.

121 posted on 03/31/2005 8:33:59 AM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: atlaw
Thank you for referring me to this.

I will read it in more detail as I have time but the first item I perused was a long chronology of the case sent by attorney Jay Wolfson to Gov. Bush. It has so far not affected my views as it clearly didn't with Gov. Bush either, but an attorney's job is to selectively present things in such a way as to justify his client and I have no problem with that. But I will try to read the the collection of documents with an open mind.

122 posted on 03/31/2005 8:35:04 AM PST by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: chimera

I hope your comments are more directed at the "faithful" Mr. Wilson than to me. I'm only hoping that if there is any evidence to be found of past physical mistreatment of Ms. Schindler by her husband, or evidence of what caused her to be deprived of oxygen for eight minutes while he was the only other person in the house, that it isn't missed or covered up due to incompetence or collusion. There's been more than enough of both in this whole tragic story.


123 posted on 03/31/2005 8:42:19 AM PST by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: katana

Yes. I am saying that those who would view the results of any autopsy as vindication of Michael Schiavo do not understand the limitations of such a study.


124 posted on 03/31/2005 8:51:55 AM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator

The GOP getting serious about judges....

Hilarious. Nearly every judge to rule on the Schaivo case was appointed by, or has a political history as a Republican.

Sorry, GOP judges, who believe in the constitution, aren't going to make up law like you're heroes who created Roe v. Wade from thin air.


125 posted on 03/31/2005 9:22:58 AM PST by rwilson99 (Heaven? or a Feeding Tube? hmmm.) Matthew 7:12 • South Park (R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: billorites

I think once this issue is debated when future legislature is being considered and the truth comes out this woman wasn't PVS, that she didn't consent to die in this situation and that her husband had motives to want her dead, the public opinion is going to shift dramatically on this issue.


126 posted on 03/31/2005 10:50:35 AM PST by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc30

It damn well was her family's business and NO ONE should be starved to death without their consent and without evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that he or she is brain-dead or PVS.


127 posted on 03/31/2005 11:00:24 AM PST by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
I've had several pro-abortion feminist agree with me in a debate group I run at Yahoo that Terri shouldn't have died without her consent and that there wasn't conclusive proof that she was PVS.

Most people only know what they hear from the "mainstream" media about this case. Once the facts get out -- and they will during future legislative debates -- I think the polls are going to be considerably different and the Democrats and left will suffer politically.

128 posted on 03/31/2005 11:05:26 AM PST by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: doc30

Check this out, Mr. Big Shot! A court appointed world-reknowned neurologist's opinion of Terri's condition in 2002.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1374661/posts


129 posted on 03/31/2005 11:10:52 AM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: chimera
I agree. But if the pattern of conflicts of interest among the main players extends to the medical examiner (something at this point almost to be expected) then it's going to make some even more bitter than they are now.

Contrarily, an autopsy might open up a host of new questions about what was going on in the Schiavo household fifteen years ago. But it won't answer those questions to the satisfaction of all sides.

It seems like most people don't want to be bothered to consider what precedent this all sets. But that, and a strong gut feeling (which, by the way, we're all allowed to have) that Mr. Schiavo's motive all along has been to conceal his part in the creation of his wife's condition, are the things which have moved me to comment on a matter that I otherwise wouldn't touch with a ten foot pole.

But what do I know? I'm just another Bible thumping nut case Neanderthal (not really but that's the label all but the atheists like Nat Hentoff, who sees this accurately as a civil rights issue, are being hit with).

130 posted on 03/31/2005 11:30:02 AM PST by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot

You mean William M. Hammesfahr, M.D.? He is an alternative medicine doctor, not a neurologist. Nor is he World Renowned. The guy is IMHO a quack and probably has done more to hurt the Schindlers cause that to help it.

Here is some background information on this doctor Hammesfahr. After reading it, would you want him to treat you or a family member?



"World Renowned Nobel Prize Nominee" - He is neither of those things. IMO, He is a fraud.

At the request of the VP of the Chiefs of Police group in Gulfport, FL, his local Congressman, Mike Bilirakis, wrote a letter asking them to consider him for a "Nobel Peace Prize in Medicine."

1. There there is no such "Peace Prize in Medicine"
2. Bilirakis is not even on the panel of people who can nominate anyone. Nor are Chiefs of Police.
( http://nobelprize.org/medicine/nomination/nominators.html )

Nevertheless, Dr Hammesfahr, who is an alternative medicine neurologist, continues to knowingly and fraudulently claim to be a Nobel Prize Nominee. At the 2002 trial, he was asked to bring a the official letter of confirmation he claimed to have in his possession. He claimed he forgot to bring it. He also could not find the records or remember names or details about the numerous people in Terri's condition he claimed he treated with success.

His claim that if a patient can swallow saliva they do not need a feeding tube is a lie. He admitted on the stand that that ability to handle their own saliva is frequently the case with PVS patients. His continual use of the "Terri had no heart attack" (he knows she had cardiac arrest, and relies on peoples' ignorance of the difference to cast doubt on the cause of Terri's collapse. It is further evidence of his deceitful character.

This "world renowned" doctor, who is listed at quackwatch.com and advertised in the National enquirer, has never published a peer-reviewed article in any respected medical journal. He claims to have had his work "peer reviewed," yet the "peers" are a few friends who work with him. http://www.hnionline.com/results_peer_reviewed_and_publis.htm

His patent is merely the use of common vasodilators to increase blood flow to the brain. It has had anecdotal success in a certain segment of patients, such as stroke patients caught very quickly. The only study he did was on whiplash. Yet he touts this treatment as a cure-all for everything from ADD to PVS. He bases his claims of success treating ADD on his treatment of 2 adult sisters who said they improved after taking the vasodilators along with doing other things that would improve them.

Here is a typical example of this man's deceitfulness. Remember - Terri, without doubt, had cardiac arrest - it is different from a Heart Attack - MI. Cardiac arrest is 50% more likely to occur if potassium is as low as a 3.7 Terri's was a 2.0. Heart attack is a totally different thing. Keeping this in mind, read this section of a transcript

HAMMESFAHR: I'd like to go back to the potassium for a second, because he talked about the potassium and about the diet pills issue or some other drugs.

COLMES: Sure. Sure.

HAMMESFAHR: But the medical record clearly shows that there has never been a heart attack. Potassium causes damage by causing heart attacks, so we know the potassium is not an issue.
...
Right now we have a woman who had a collapse with no known cause. No evidence of infection, heart attack, respiratory failure or anything. The only thing found in the emergency room is a damaged neck.

Now, he is either clueless about common physiology and forgot that her charts said Cardiac arrest,
*and* too clueless about his own specialty of neurology to remember that opisthotonus (the kind of neck Terri has)
goes along with her decerebrate rigidity,
or he is making a concerted effort to deceive people into believing Michael strangled her.



Quackwatch http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Tests/tcd.html
2002 Trial Transcript
Multiple web sites investigating him

(Watch cites - PR Web publishes PR pages for those promoting themselves.)
http://www.hnionline.com/nominating_letter_for_the_Nobel.htm
http://www.hnionline.com/nobel_prize_nomination.htm


131 posted on 03/31/2005 11:32:57 AM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

In Florida law, if a person is incapacitated, the spouse is first in line to make the decisions. Independent physicians appointed by the court, not ones paid for by the Schindlers or Schaivo, said she was PVS. Greer simply followed the law and rejected Terri's parent's request. What would you propose to replace this law? IMHO, if someone is PVS, a feeding tube is artificial support, just like a ventilator. Feeding tubes do get pulled from people.


132 posted on 03/31/2005 11:38:04 AM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: doc30
Thanks for the info. I did follow the links.

Obviously, I didn't change your mind but neither did you change mine. As I recall, there were other neurologists involved who reached similar conclusions.

By the by, if Hammesfahr was such a quack why did the court appoint him? Were they prepared to discount any opinions he may have had contrary to their intent? That is, in fact, what they did.

As the incestuous relationship between so many of the principals involved in this unfolds, I think the truth will be revealed.
133 posted on 03/31/2005 11:52:34 AM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: doc30
100%? Really? 100%? You sure about that? 100%? Not 99% or 98% but 100%?

Even this part?

We chose Bush Jr. because he let us know, early in the campaign, that he would not spend his presidency relitigating — literally or figuratively — Roe v. Wade, however abortion offended his sense of right and wrong. He made clear he had other, higher priorities.

134 posted on 03/31/2005 11:59:41 AM PST by Critter (America, home of the whipped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
It will be like a lot of us several years after Waco, when the truth began to leak out into the mainstream, or when we accidentally stumbled across the truth on the internet as in my case.

It made me completely aware of how biased the main stream media really is.

Terri's case also shows me that I can't trust some supposedly "unbiased" sources either.

135 posted on 03/31/2005 12:06:39 PM PST by Critter (America, home of the whipped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: doc30
I agree 100% with Dick Morris on this one. Let Terri rest in peace. And to those who support "saving" her, it's none of your business.

Like the Holocaust was not our business? A woman was starved to death on the order of a megalomaniac judge at the the request of her thug of a husband and that is not our business?
lets just kill retards,crippled people,anyone who is "life unworthy of life" or costs the government money
136 posted on 03/31/2005 12:09:19 PM PST by Charlespg (Civilization and freedom are only worthy of those who defend or support defending It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: doc30
PVS is a totally SUBJECTIVE analysis. And, when 33 doctors stated she wasn't PVS and when nurses, doctors, lawyers, friends and family members state she was responsive to questions and when tapes exist proving it, then it can safely be stated there as considerable doubt about whether she was PVS. Do you even care?

Putting life and death decisions in the hands of one judge, a judge in this case that received money from one of the lawyers, is frightening to anyone believing in freedom and basic civil rights for all.

137 posted on 03/31/2005 12:38:15 PM PST by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot
Thanks for the info. I did follow the links. Obviously, I didn't change your mind but neither did you change mine. As I recall, there were other neurologists involved who reached similar conclusions.

You are welcome. It is better to be informed on both sides of an issue than to simply carry on with only part of the information.

By the by, if Hammesfahr was such a quack why did the court appoint him? Were they prepared to discount any opinions he may have had contrary to their intent? That is, in fact, what they did.

The court didn't appoint him. He impeached himself regarding basic neurology information. He was hired by the Schindlers and I think that was part of the problem. The Schindlers have been really big on alternative medicine because traditional medicine has consistently come to the same conclusion, Terri is PVS. All of the doctors they hired as expert witnesses were from alternative medicine areas and that really hurt their credibility in court. The problem was they couldn't find any traditional or mainstream neurologist who would counter the arguement that Terri is PVS.

As the incestuous relationship between so many of the principals involved in this unfolds, I think the truth will be revealed.

I think this is going to go the way of JFK's assassination - layer upon layer of conspiracy theories. In any county or municipal politics, you will find all kinds of relationships between the local officials. People know people and that can be used to really confuse the issues at hand. I don't think there was any conspiracy amongst locals to do Terri in. The case basically rested on specific Florida Statutes (that aren't much different than those in other states) that give the spouse the responsibilty for the medical decisions in cases like these. Greer's hands were tied. He could have ruled against MS, but he would have been overturned on appeal. Personally, I think MS is a neandertal, but the law is on his side. The only solution is to change the law.

138 posted on 03/31/2005 12:41:59 PM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

She wan't responsive in any cognitive way. It was all reflexes and are normal in PVS. The tapes were heavily edited to get a few seconds of reflexes corresponding to what was going on in the room. Isn't it kind of strange that the only people who say she wasn't PVS were ones that are associated with the Schindlers? There are a lot of other doctors and most of the nursing staff that say differently. There is also the CT scan and the EEGs that are strong indications of PVS. Let's see if the autopsy shows anything different.


139 posted on 03/31/2005 12:47:26 PM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: doc30
Greer's hands were tied. He could have ruled against MS, but he would have been overturned on appeal. Personally, I think MS is a neandertal, but the law is on his side. The only solution is to change the law.

If the information is correct, the first Judge to rule against the Schindlers' attempt to replace MS as guardian was a Judge Shame, aptly named IMO. All subsequent rulings seem to rest on that one.

The Schiindlers had gone to Shame when he was a lawyer planning to run for judge, not yet a judge. The Schindlers laid out to him their complaint and all the information they had about the case. Shame asked a very high retainer to take their case, in the opinion of some high enough to assure its rejection, and they did not retain him. They instead hired a less expensive woman associate of his who represented them in court where the judge was the newly elected Shame. Those circumstances alone should have prevented Shame from hearing the case as he not only had a conflict of interest but extensive prior knowledge of the case.

From the review of the case that I have read, they were very poorly represented by this woman and the case was decided against them. As I said, all other decisions seem to just build on that decision rather than any consideration of facts. This leaves them with judicially clean hands as the process was correctly followed. No matter how technically correct, this not not represent justice to me and many others.

140 posted on 03/31/2005 2:04:44 PM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson