Posted on 03/26/2005 10:25:53 PM PST by freespirited
classic moonbat
Like the rest of the Radical Left, Churchill's life is one big fantasy.
Why do we allow this man his freedom, when he so damages others' freedom to live their lives.
There are laws and social constraints meant to control deviant behavior. Apparently not enough of them.
When will people, especially CU, fiqure out that this Ward "Carp with flapping lips (his Indian name)" Churchill is a flim-flam man...
True, but as you know, with liberals it is not the results (truth) that counts; it's the "intention" (spin).
He's supposed to be Cherokee...and has a objibwe name, and says hello using a sioux phrase...
Amusing. the Chippewa (objibwe) are traditional enemies of the Lakota/Dakota (Sioux).
It would be like saying L'chaim and claiming one is Saudi...
How Kerryesque LOL
I missed the "big announcement" today but I'm guessing he won't be leaving his position. I bet the kids love him because it's the one class in which they're all sure they're smarter than the teacher.
Wow, that's a lot to say about a liar and a cheat nobody. Just keep giving him rope, I see the gallows just up ahead.
bttt
LoL..
Churchill does have Indian ancestors!....He's related to Chief Horse Crap!......
This ignores the motivation of a typical white radical liberal male academic.
A white male without an issue of some sort is viewed by the academic profession with skepticism and suspicion. Even a white radical liberal male (because he can always change his mind later). For the academic career track, it is better to be a dyslexic, or have been abused as a child, or part minority in ancestry, etc. That way, one can claim victimhood with impunity; this also tends to immunize one against any would-be enemies and competitors. Being part minority is better since that legitimizes the necessary political rock-throwing that goes with being an academic these days.
Most troubling to Cambridge has been seeing Churchill shine at CU as an American Indian academic, while his own opportunities at CU have been few.
Sounds as if he did not have radical enough liberal credentials (can't ignore the fundamentals)...
As far as this hero-wannabe's phoney sounding RSVN claims .... maybe Mr.B.G.Burkett [of Stolen Valor fame] might be interested in digging up Ward Churchill's real Army record for us.
Anybody got Burkett's email or number?
Protection of free speech does not mean anyone is required to keep him on the payroll if his speech is horribly offensive. That the Chancellor of CU does not understand what the 1st Amendment means is as troubling as this idiot Churchill continuing to maintain tenure. I will ask this cowardly Chancellor one more time.... anti-semetic, anti-black, anti-gay, anti-female speech is also protected under the 1st Amendment, but if Churchill declared himself a sympathizer of the Ku Klux Klan and gave racist speeches would he still keep him on as a professor at CU? Of course not, because what we are really talking about is protecting radical leftist speech, not just unpopular speech.
The mark of a true sociopath and psychotic is believing the lies you tell other people- and the more grandiose the embelishment, the bigger the character you become. I grew up with a kid like this, and I wonder which prison or asylum he's in now...
Actually, I have it on good authority that it means "sphincter". |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.