eventually mexicans will get unlimited access to US government dollars. think about it.
nobody is minding the store.
Thanks for sharing your ignorance with us. CINTRA is Spanish, not Mexican. "Cintra, with headquarters in Madrid, Spain, " http://www.txfb.org/TexasAgriculture/2005/031805/031805TTCpart3.htm
Also, in government schools, they teach that the first word of a sentence should be capitalized, and that proper nouns (such as "Mexican") should also start with an upper case letter.
This will have to be nowhere near the I-35 corridor. They can't expand I-35 anymore so they want to tear up more land? I definitely do not want to see this happen.
The key to understanding the president's policy toward's mexico is to look at how the president views european integration. he think's its ok. he's even in favor of including the turks in europe--against the insincts and aspriations of most the europeans--even or most especially the french.
european integration is a top down affair. north american integration is mostly a bottoms up affair. that is the secondary--or primary purpose of illegals is to create a transnational constiuency for north american integration.
(this is process of continental integration is considered to be an essential stepping stone for one world governement. The process of going from the nation state to one world government in one jump has proven to be too difficult so the one worlders are looking for intermediate term solutions. this north american continental integration is one step in the process.)
//////////////
Having said that the French left seems to be having serious second thoughts about france joining the EU and that seems to be bleeding into french leftist thinking in Canada. Consider these two articles: (its not entirely clear to me why the french left is suddenly against the eu. but it might have something to do with turks--whose participation in the EU the the french adamently oppose.)
France and the European Union: Are they winning?
The Economist ^ | March 23, 2005 | Unattributed
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1369142/posts
Posted on 03/23/2005 2:21:36 PM PST by quidnunc
The shocking risk of a non to the European Union constitution.
It was not supposed to happen this fast. When President Jacques Chirac decided to advance France's referendum on the draft European Union constitution to May 29th, the idea was to avoid the “Maastricht scenario”. In 1992 support for that treaty sank over the summer months from 65% to just 51%. This time, with two months still left, two new opinion polls suggest that backing for the constitution has already collapsed: the no vote is now at 51-52%. Is France, architect of Europe, really set to reject its first constitution?
/////////////////////////
Canada's Left Angry With PM's 'Hidden' U.S. Agenda
Posted by hedgetrimmer
On 03/23/2005 11:46:10 AM PST · 23 replies · 402+ views
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1369020/posts
Reuters ^ | Mar 22, 2005
An opposition party that is helping to keep Canada's minority Liberal government in power angrily accused Prime Minister Paul Martin on Tuesday of planning to push an agenda of closer integration with the United States. Martin is due to meet with U.S. President George W. Bush (news - web sites) and Mexican President Vincente Fox in Texas on Wednesday for talks that will include discussions on how to improve the North American Free Trade Agreement. Canadian officials say they want to eliminate "nuisance tariffs" among the three partners and harmonize some continental business regulations. But the idea of any deeper...