Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawmaker Seeks to End Sexy Cheerleading
AP ^ | 03/18/05 | APRIL CASTRO

Posted on 03/18/2005 8:24:45 AM PST by nypokerface

AUSTIN, Texas - The Friday night lights in Texas could soon be without bumpin' and grindin' cheerleaders. Legislation filed by Rep. Al Edwards would put an end to "sexually suggestive" performances at athletic events and other extracurricular competitions.

"It's just too sexually oriented, you know, the way they're shaking their behinds and going on, breaking it down," said Edwards, a 26-year veteran of the Texas House. "And then we say to them, 'don't get involved in sex unless it's marriage or love, it's dangerous out there' and yet the teachers and directors are helping them go through those kind of gyrations."

Under Edwards' bill, if a school district knowingly permits such a performance, funds from the state would be reduced in an amount to be determined by the education commissioner.

Edwards said he filed the bill as a result of several instances of seeing such ribald performances in his district.

J.M. Farias, owner of Austin Cheer Factory, said cheerleading aficionados would welcome the law. Cheering competitions, he said, penalize for suggestive movements or any vulgarity.

"Any coaches that are good won't put that in their routines," he said. And, most girls cheering on Friday nights were trained by professionals who know better, he said.

"I don't think this law would really shake the industry at all. In fact, it would give parents a better feeling, mostly dads and boyfriends, too," Farias said.

Although cheerleaders must meet the same no-pass, no-play academic requirements of athletes, cheerleading is not a competition sanctioned by the University Interscholastic League, the governing body of Texas high school sports.

The UIL also does not have performance regulations for squads who cheer for their teams at state championships, said Athletic Coordinator Peter Contreras.

"I think it should have been cut out a long time ago," Edwards said. "It surely needs to be toned down."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: cheerleaders; filth; hot; pedophilia; perversion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last

1 posted on 03/18/2005 8:24:46 AM PST by nypokerface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nypokerface

I hate when they go on and break it down.


2 posted on 03/18/2005 8:25:34 AM PST by bigsigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface

Please, noboby post the Katie Couric pic!


3 posted on 03/18/2005 8:26:00 AM PST by pissant (only 362 days to go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
Mandate Helen Thomas cheerleader clones. Its a simpler solution to the problem of boys with slack jaws. ;-)

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
4 posted on 03/18/2005 8:26:57 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
"Any coaches that are good won't put that in their routines," he said. And, most girls cheering on Friday nights were trained by professionals who know better, he said.

Don't these girls have fathers? I love blanket statements like the one above.
5 posted on 03/18/2005 8:27:54 AM PST by MikefromOhio (Silly Hippies, Bush Won!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

crap, I cut myself off...

what I meant to say is, Don't these girls have fathers to do that for themselves? Why do we need some politician saying it needs to stop? Anyone?


6 posted on 03/18/2005 8:29:37 AM PST by MikefromOhio (Silly Hippies, Bush Won!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Mandate Helen Thomas cheerleader clones. Its a simpler solution to the problem of boys with slack jaws. ;-)

Then their jaws will be slack with fear and pain.

7 posted on 03/18/2005 8:30:45 AM PST by Hardastarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface

Since there is no mention by the AP of this guy's political affiliation, is it safe to assume he is a Dem?


8 posted on 03/18/2005 8:31:07 AM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface

And where was this guy's concern when HIS PRESIDENT WAS GETTING BJs IN THE WHITE HOUSE?? -- yet he picks on cheer leaders. Idiot.


9 posted on 03/18/2005 8:31:17 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

I agree. I've only been a reformed liberal for about 6 months now and I'm getting increasingly disturbed by intrusive, big government conservatism.


10 posted on 03/18/2005 8:32:03 AM PST by Jibaholic (The facts of life are conservative - Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface

Oh for cryin' out loud!

Don't you have anything better to do? (the nutcase legislator)


11 posted on 03/18/2005 8:33:05 AM PST by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface

Well this post is a duplicate of an earlier one, but never mind.

This is a perfect example of nannyism. Of course cheerleaders look sexy. That's the idea, or they wouldn't be wearing what they're wearing.

This guy's an idiot.


12 posted on 03/18/2005 8:34:09 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface

A lot of schools don't allow dirty dancing, so why should they allow dirty cheerleading?


13 posted on 03/18/2005 8:34:56 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
"It's just too sexually oriented, you know, the way they're shaking their behinds and going on, breaking it down," said Edwards, a 26-year veteran of the Texas House

I would bet that Rep. Edwards has been studying the routines verrrryyy closely.....

14 posted on 03/18/2005 8:35:27 AM PST by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
Cheerleading is supposed to be sexy or they wouldn't be out in the cold in those tiny costumes.

This guy has way too much time on his hands.

SO9

15 posted on 03/18/2005 8:36:17 AM PST by Servant of the 9 (Goldwater Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
of course cheerleaders look sexy

Just deport the guy to New England. I am sure he won't find most of our plump cheerleaders "too sexy". ;-)
16 posted on 03/18/2005 8:36:37 AM PST by cgbg (Fire the Trustees of the Social Security Trust Fund with no money in it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface

Well thank GOD some people have some backbone to stop the selling and promoting of illicit sex. Most families are trying to teach their kids not to be promiscuous in a world that practically promotes sex in the streets. About time.


17 posted on 03/18/2005 8:37:00 AM PST by zippee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the 9

This guy is an idiot. They (Cheerleaders) have been doing this stuff for years.


18 posted on 03/18/2005 8:38:03 AM PST by teg68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

..Why do we need some politician saying it needs to stop? Anyone?...

If I can answer for a certain fringe group that frequents these threads:
1) Jesus wants this stopped.
2) Our societies values are eroding and it has to be stopped somewhere so the children won't be harmed.


19 posted on 03/18/2005 8:38:07 AM PST by don'tbedenied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: zippee

"Well thank GOD some people have some backbone to stop the selling and promoting of illicit sex. "

Funny. Here you are backing a Democrat. How are cheerleaders promoting "illicit sex." Cheerleaders promote good old-fashioned ordinary sex, it seems to me.

Nannyism...that's what this is. Perhaps you're in the wrong party.


20 posted on 03/18/2005 8:39:14 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson