[Robert A Cook PE]

Nah.

Granted, that is a "rather inflammatory" statement (for a repubbie to make, but pales in comparison with what the democrats have been saying for years in their official policy statements and speeches INSIDE Congress!), but can be backed up by 8 years of actions by Hillary's White House.

[governsleastgovernsbest]

I don't doubt that Clinton would jeopardize US security to further his political/financial interests. But when the author says that Clinton's actions were "designed" to do that, it clearly seems to indicate that such was Clinton's GOAL. I simply don't see the evidence for that.

If it's true, then Clinton is the worst traitor in US history. It would certainly be very damning of Bush 41 & 43 too, for that matter. Knowing what they know, how could they possibly fraternize with Clinton, send him off to represent the country, etc?