[governsleastgovernsbest]

I don't doubt that Clinton would jeopardize US security to further his political/financial interests. But when the author says that Clinton's actions were "designed" to do that, it clearly seems to indicate that such was Clinton's GOAL. I simply don't see the evidence for that.

If it's true, then Clinton is the worst traitor in US history. It would certainly be very damning of Bush 41 & 43 too, for that matter. Knowing what they know, how could they possibly fraternize with Clinton, send him off to represent the country, etc?

[Robert A Cook PE]

Don't look at me!

Bush's outright refusal to treat Clinton's crimes, and his/her crimes and their staff's corruption (and general democratic corruption such as voter fraud and Congressional refusals) has always been puzzling to me.

Incomprehensible.