Skip to comments.
U.S. Says It Has Withdrawn From World Judicial Body
NY Times ^
| March 10, 2005
| ADAM LIPTAK
Posted on 03/09/2005 8:35:05 PM PST by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 221-231 next last
To: Havoc
Read sometime the Oath of Office for the POTUS sometime.
It is the President's job description.
161
posted on
03/10/2005 12:07:04 PM PST
by
Happy2BMe
(Government is not the solution to our problem, government *IS* the problem.)
To: neverdem
Prompted by an international tribunal's decision last year ordering new hearings for 51 Mexicans on death rows in the United States, the State Department said yesterday that the United States had withdrawn from the protocol that gave the tribunal jurisdiction to hear such disputes.YES!!! Why were we even IN this tribunal?
To: NautiNurse
The point is he never said any opinion was BASED on international whatever just that they found the Teenage Killer case "consistent" with international whatever. They didn't even need to do that since 1) teenage killers are almost never executed anyway or sentenced to death and 2) many states have no death penalty for anyone.
The Justices don't need to look abroad to make bad law (unfortunately.)
To: Publius6961
That is false read the ruling if you care to be accurate. He never said any rulings have been "BASED" upon international law.
To: TitansAFC
I don't mean to rain on your parade, but hasn't the Supreme Court pretty much been a branch of the world court?
165
posted on
03/10/2005 12:35:36 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: teenyelliott
Now if only we would withdraw from the U.N. One thing at a time.
It may require the election of a 3rd Bush.
166
posted on
03/10/2005 12:40:06 PM PST
by
evad
To: Ruth A.
"It's a sore-loser kind of move," Professor Spiro said.
sore-loser? . Prof. Spiro, are you a FR lurker?
167
posted on
03/10/2005 12:50:00 PM PST
by
BARLF
To: neverdem
"It's a sore-loser kind of move," Professor Spiro said. "If we can't win, we're not going to play."
The "game" is over. We won.
To: teenyelliott
Clever, very clever. Diabolical, really.
169
posted on
03/10/2005 1:03:08 PM PST
by
Finger Monkey
(H.R. 25, Fair Tax Act - do the research, contact your legislators, get this puppy passed.)
To: justshutupandtakeit
The Justices don't need to look abroad to make bad law (unfortunately.)No, they don't--but Kennedy did just that--at the very least to bolster his opinion and/or to make himself feel better.
170
posted on
03/10/2005 1:09:29 PM PST
by
NautiNurse
(Osama bin Laden has more tapes than Steely Dan)
To: justshutupandtakeit
Justice Scalia seemed to think otherwise. Read his opinion.
To: NautiNurse
I see no damage in pointing out that the opinion was consistent with views currently held around the world. I don't particularly care but it doesn't hurt anything.
To: monkeywrench
I was just commenting on what Kennedy actually said in the opinion as opposed to the misimpression which is widespread here.
To: justshutupandtakeit
I like Scalia's opinion better.
174
posted on
03/10/2005 1:25:49 PM PST
by
NautiNurse
(Osama bin Laden has more tapes than Steely Dan)
To: NautiNurse
I do not agree with the ruling either. But I fear we are a minority within the country.
To: peyton randolph
Peter J. Spiro, a law professor at the University of Georgia, said the withdrawal was unbecoming
These people are everywhere..on a positive note--they are being exposed.Thank You Gore ,,for the internet.
176
posted on
03/10/2005 1:55:27 PM PST
by
southronbtgoG
(GRITS-----what more can you say......DEO-VINDICE)
To: neverdem
This kind of unilateralism annoys the bologna out of the Euros. However, the Euros have been doing their own international unilateralism for decades, so they can't play the moral superiority card.
177
posted on
03/10/2005 1:57:26 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(Please correct if cosmic balance requires.)
To: maestro
'Sharia' has a death penalty.
178
posted on
03/10/2005 2:02:28 PM PST
by
mellyK
To: Blood of Tyrants
---"I don't mean to rain on your parade, but hasn't the Supreme Court pretty much been a branch of the world court?"---
Yup. But we can correct that via the process. We cannot, however, exert any influence over a "world court."
I'm still happy. Long way to go, though.....
179
posted on
03/10/2005 2:07:11 PM PST
by
TitansAFC
(When will Kristen Breitweiser just declare her candidacy already?!?!?)
To: TitansAFC
Yes! Thank you President Bush.
180
posted on
03/10/2005 2:28:32 PM PST
by
Zoey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 221-231 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson