Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Says It Has Withdrawn From World Judicial Body
NY Times ^ | March 10, 2005 | ADAM LIPTAK

Posted on 03/09/2005 8:35:05 PM PST by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 221-231 next last
To: Havoc
Read sometime the Oath of Office for the POTUS sometime.

It is the President's job description.

161 posted on 03/10/2005 12:07:04 PM PST by Happy2BMe (Government is not the solution to our problem, government *IS* the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Prompted by an international tribunal's decision last year ordering new hearings for 51 Mexicans on death rows in the United States, the State Department said yesterday that the United States had withdrawn from the protocol that gave the tribunal jurisdiction to hear such disputes.

YES!!! Why were we even IN this tribunal?

162 posted on 03/10/2005 12:11:50 PM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

The point is he never said any opinion was BASED on international whatever just that they found the Teenage Killer case "consistent" with international whatever. They didn't even need to do that since 1) teenage killers are almost never executed anyway or sentenced to death and 2) many states have no death penalty for anyone.

The Justices don't need to look abroad to make bad law (unfortunately.)


163 posted on 03/10/2005 12:31:50 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

That is false read the ruling if you care to be accurate. He never said any rulings have been "BASED" upon international law.


164 posted on 03/10/2005 12:34:14 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

I don't mean to rain on your parade, but hasn't the Supreme Court pretty much been a branch of the world court?


165 posted on 03/10/2005 12:35:36 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: teenyelliott
Now if only we would withdraw from the U.N.

One thing at a time.

It may require the election of a 3rd Bush.

166 posted on 03/10/2005 12:40:06 PM PST by evad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ruth A.
"It's a sore-loser kind of move," Professor Spiro said.
sore-loser? . Prof. Spiro, are you a FR lurker?
167 posted on 03/10/2005 12:50:00 PM PST by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"It's a sore-loser kind of move," Professor Spiro said. "If we can't win, we're not going to play."

The "game" is over. We won.
168 posted on 03/10/2005 12:53:59 PM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: teenyelliott

Clever, very clever. Diabolical, really.


169 posted on 03/10/2005 1:03:08 PM PST by Finger Monkey (H.R. 25, Fair Tax Act - do the research, contact your legislators, get this puppy passed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
The Justices don't need to look abroad to make bad law (unfortunately.)

No, they don't--but Kennedy did just that--at the very least to bolster his opinion and/or to make himself feel better.

170 posted on 03/10/2005 1:09:29 PM PST by NautiNurse (Osama bin Laden has more tapes than Steely Dan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

Justice Scalia seemed to think otherwise. Read his opinion.


171 posted on 03/10/2005 1:13:21 PM PST by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

I see no damage in pointing out that the opinion was consistent with views currently held around the world. I don't particularly care but it doesn't hurt anything.


172 posted on 03/10/2005 1:18:37 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: monkeywrench

I was just commenting on what Kennedy actually said in the opinion as opposed to the misimpression which is widespread here.


173 posted on 03/10/2005 1:19:50 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

I like Scalia's opinion better.


174 posted on 03/10/2005 1:25:49 PM PST by NautiNurse (Osama bin Laden has more tapes than Steely Dan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

I do not agree with the ruling either. But I fear we are a minority within the country.


175 posted on 03/10/2005 1:45:27 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

Peter J. Spiro, a law professor at the University of Georgia, said the withdrawal was unbecoming


These people are everywhere..on a positive note--they are being exposed.Thank You Gore ,,for the internet.


176 posted on 03/10/2005 1:55:27 PM PST by southronbtgoG (GRITS-----what more can you say......DEO-VINDICE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

This kind of unilateralism annoys the bologna out of the Euros. However, the Euros have been doing their own international unilateralism for decades, so they can't play the moral superiority card.


177 posted on 03/10/2005 1:57:26 PM PST by RightWhale (Please correct if cosmic balance requires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maestro

'Sharia' has a death penalty.


178 posted on 03/10/2005 2:02:28 PM PST by mellyK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

---"I don't mean to rain on your parade, but hasn't the Supreme Court pretty much been a branch of the world court?"---

Yup. But we can correct that via the process. We cannot, however, exert any influence over a "world court."

I'm still happy. Long way to go, though.....


179 posted on 03/10/2005 2:07:11 PM PST by TitansAFC (When will Kristen Breitweiser just declare her candidacy already?!?!?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Yes! Thank you President Bush.


180 posted on 03/10/2005 2:28:32 PM PST by Zoey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 221-231 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson