I see no damage in pointing out that the opinion was consistent with views currently held around the world. I don't particularly care but it doesn't hurt anything.
I like Scalia's opinion better.
"I see no damage in pointing out that the opinion was consistent with views currently held around the world. I don't particularly care but it doesn't hurt anything."
The job of the Supreme Court of the US is NOT to point out opinions from around the world. The job of the Supreme Court is only to determine the intent of the law of this land.
What law did Justice Kennedy interpret? Why did he interpret it that way?