Skip to comments.
Breaking news!!! Mt. St. Helens erupting
Posted on 03/08/2005 5:41:50 PM PST by djf
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440, 441-460, 461-480, 481-497 last
To: Neets; Howlin
Damn, I am soooo jealous.Don't be - it would look so out of place on a woman.
To: Senator Pardek
Damn baby all I need is a lil bit
A lil bit of this, a lil bit of that
Get it crackin' in the club when you hear this s@#+
Drop it like its hot, get to workin' that back
Go shake that thang, yeah work that thang
Let me see it go up and down
482
posted on
03/09/2005 7:08:55 PM PST
by
Neets
(Proudly posting at 4'11" since '98)
To: Senator Pardek
Are you being your charming self tonight?
483
posted on
03/09/2005 7:09:51 PM PST
by
missyme
(The Cosmic Effect of some Freepers...)
To: missyme
To: Senator Pardek
Geez what do you and Neets got going on tonight???
485
posted on
03/09/2005 7:35:18 PM PST
by
missyme
(The Cosmic Effect of some Freepers...)
To: missyme
To: Senator Pardek
487
posted on
03/09/2005 7:37:29 PM PST
by
missyme
(The Cosmic Effect of some Freepers...)
To: djf
Environmental whacko alert!!!
This is
Mt. Saint Helens erupting on May 18, 1980
Science magazine (5 Sep 1980) reported the following radioactive releases in the 1980 eruption:
Radon daughters (Pb-214, Bi-214, Pu-214) were found in the ash at levels similar to those of uranium tailings material. It is probable that the decay of Radon 222 gas resulted in these daughters and that approximately three (3) million curies of radon gas were in the plume. (where oh where is the National Resources Defense Council or the Sierra Clubbers when we need them??)
Other radionuclides ejected in the cloud were:
K-40 61,000 Curies
Ra-226 3,200 Curies
Th-232 680 Curies
A total of 540 million tons of ash were ejected into the atmosphere. Compare this to what the eco-nazis are suing companies and utilities to remove from power plants AS WE SPEAK and you can begin to comprehend the utter megalomania of this human hating crowd.
To: tx_eggman; Petronski
>>>>Red hot frickin lava<<<<
>>That would be magma, Petronski, magma.<<
Nope. Magma is on the inside. Once you can see it, it's lava.
489
posted on
03/11/2005 10:56:36 AM PST
by
dangus
To: dangus; tx_eggman
You're both right.
Magma on the surface is lava.
But the quote that I misquoted should have been magma, because of the oddly-funny pronunciation Dr. Evil uses for the word "magma."
490
posted on
03/11/2005 10:59:11 AM PST
by
Petronski
(If 'Judge' Greer can kill Terri, who will be next?)
To: Petronski; dangus
because of the oddly-funny pronunciation Dr. Evil uses for the word "magma." Ding, ding, ding .. we have a winner. Don Pardo, tell him what he's won.
My original response to Petronski wasn't intended to evoke scientific controversy, it was merely a reference to the picture of Dr. Evil he posted with the "red hot frickin lava" quote and said Dr. Evil's use of the word magma rather than lava
Sheesh ....
491
posted on
03/11/2005 12:54:39 PM PST
by
tx_eggman
("Reality is like fine wine, it will not appeal to children." Don Miller)
To: Izzy Dunne
It looks like they're standing farther back to take pictures this time around.
To: djf; All
Bttt. There have been six quakes on the mountain >3 in the last 36 hours or so. While not necessarily showing anything is imminent, it is a noticable increase and change of activity. A number of the quakes have been in the ~ 1KM subsurface range, which is where they were occurring last Sept. before the October events.
493
posted on
03/27/2005 10:27:52 AM PST
by
djf
To: Valpal1
I forget all the extra air filter stuff we did to our cars the first biggy in Spokane.
At least SOME kind of extra filter material. And changed frequently, if I recall correctly.
494
posted on
03/27/2005 10:54:24 AM PST
by
Quix
(HAVING A FORM of GODLINESS but DENYING IT'S POWER. 2 TIM 3:5)
To: dogbyte12
Good for pot scrubbing.
Slick as snot when wet.
495
posted on
03/27/2005 11:07:07 AM PST
by
Quix
(HAVING A FORM of GODLINESS but DENYING IT'S POWER. 2 TIM 3:5)
To: PennsylvaniaMom
Those were certainly more rowdy and more of a free-for-all days in the beginning.
But some of them were sooooooo irrationally assaultive at the drop of a hat--accusing one of all manner of things just based on their opinions.
I mostly don't miss them that much.
Most of them seemed to keep a target in the middle of my forehead or butt virtually all the time regardless of how carefully I posted. Of course, I tended to post on topics they were hostile to generally speaking.
496
posted on
03/27/2005 11:17:22 AM PST
by
Quix
(HAVING A FORM of GODLINESS but DENYING IT'S POWER. 2 TIM 3:5)
To: cherry
Did you work at Sacred Hurt? My wife was intensive care nursery nurse there.
497
posted on
03/27/2005 11:21:33 AM PST
by
Quix
(HAVING A FORM of GODLINESS but DENYING IT'S POWER. 2 TIM 3:5)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440, 441-460, 461-480, 481-497 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson