Posted on 03/08/2005 12:06:04 PM PST by r5boston
Or a real geek might note the milestone as 400 or 2000 or 10000000000... and also be correct.
Post 10000010010 !!!
Post 10000010011 !!!
You claim loss of data occurs during conversion between two compressed formats -- don't try to weasel-out, that is your claim. Such conversion occurs during this test. If your theory is correct, the final file should NOT be the same as the original file due to loss of data during conversion.
I ran this sucker through three different lossless compression formats, and there was still no loss of audio quality, the audio being exactly the same.
That's it. You've lost. Admit it, the evidence is right there in front of you. In honor of your loss, the audio track I used was Mozart's Introitus Requiem.
Do NOT screw with me on audio, video and graphics. I've done it for far too long for some pissant to challenge me on what is basic knowledge for anyone in the field.
I've always wondered why we chopped up analog sound instead of simply reproducing the analog signal digitally. IOW, instead of taking time/frequency samples, calculate the mathematical formulae for the sine waves. It's probably because that would take more computing power than we had back then.
BTW, where's your evidence that it DOES degrade it?
Do you hear crickets?
I at least expected some more denial. Oh well, looks like this one's over.
chirp ... chirp ... chirp
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.