Posted on 03/02/2005 4:39:49 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
WASHINGTON (AP) - A pair of Jewish groups accused Sen. Robert Byrd on Wednesday of making an outrageous and reprehensible comparison between Adolf Hitler's Nazis and a Senate GOP plan to block Democrats from filibustering. Byrd spokesman Tom Gavin denied that Byrd, D-W.Va., had compared Republicans to Hitler. He said that instead, the reference to Nazis in a Senate speech on Tuesday was meant to underscore that the past should not be ignored.
"Terrible chapters of history ought never be repeated," Gavin said. "All one needs to do is to look at history to see how dangerous it is to curb the rights of the minority."
Abraham H. Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, said Wednesday that Byrd's remarks showed "a profound lack of understanding as to who Hitler was" and that the senator should apologize to the American people.
"It is hideous, outrageous and offensive for Senator Byrd to suggest that the Republican Party's tactics could in any way resemble those of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party," Foxman said.
In his comments Tuesday, Byrd defended the right senators have to use filibusters - procedural delays that can kill an item unless 60 of the 100 senators vote to move ahead.
Byrd cited Hitler's 1930s rise to power by, in part, pushing legislation through the German parliament that seemed to legitimize his ascension.
"We, unlike Nazi Germany or Mussolini's Italy, have never stopped being a nation of laws, not of men," Byrd said. "But witness how men with motives and a majority can manipulate law to cruel and unjust ends."
Byrd then quoted historian Alan Bullock, saying Hitler "turned the law inside out and made illegality legal."
Byrd added, "That is what the nuclear option seeks to do."
The nuclear option is the nickname for the proposal to end filibusters of judicial nominations because of the devastating effect the plan, if enacted, would have on relations between Democrats and Republicans.
The back and forth was the latest twist in the battle over Senate GOP efforts to free 10 nominated judges that the chamber's minority Democrats have blocked during President Bush's first term. The Senate confirmed 204 others.
The first criticism of Byrd came Wednesday when Matt Brooks, executive director of the Republican Jewish Coalition, issued a written statement.
"With his knowledge of history and his own personal background as a KKK member, he should be ashamed for implying that his political opponents are using Nazi tactics," Brooks said.
Byrd joined the Ku Klux Klan as a young man and has repeatedly apologized for it. Now 87 and the Senate's longest-serving member at 47 years, he prides himself on his knowledge of history and makes historical references frequently during debates.
Brooks also attacked as "disgusting" Byrd's remark that "some in the Senate are ready to callously incinerate" senators' rights to filibuster. The comment came amid several references by Byrd to the "nuclear option."
"There is no excuse for raising the specter of the Holocaust crematoria in a discussion of the Senate filibuster," Brooks said. "That kind of political heavy-handedness is inappropriate and reprehensible."
Byrd is a long-standing defender of the chamber's rules and traditions, many of which help the Senate's minority party.
"In the Senate, when a majority runs roughshod over the minority, the people's liberties can be in danger," Gavin said. "That majority may be a majority of one party or a majority of one region or a majority of one interest.
Brooks said his group's counterpart, the National Jewish Democratic Council, should condemn Byrd's comments. Ira Foreman, executive director of the Democratic group, declined to comment.
I'm sure the sane ones do. The DUmmies can't get enough though.
All of a sudden this word "Nazi" that has been bandied about so prominently by the left is blowing up in their face! I am loving every minute of it. Seems like every time they open their mouth, they have reason to squirm afterward. Their rants, obstructionism and hate speech is wearing thin. Things looking pretty grim because that was all they had left!
I wonder.
Truth...simply stated.
I doubt it they believe that whatever they say is being taken as gospel by their minions/followers!
Robert Byrd is a haughty demagogue. He's notorious for being rude to staffers and thinks that West Virginia would cease to exist without him. He's had more statues built for him than Julias Caesar. But he'll be reelected next year to spew even more of his pompous tirades. Too bad.
The Democrats spent so many years in the majority, that they are having a tough time handling their minority status.If you go back to the 1930s when the Republicans went from 36 years of majority to long term minority status they reacted much the same way the Democrats are acting today. Roosevelt was very good at luring some Republicans to vote his way. He suffered many attacks from Republicans... He did not return the nasty attacks. Roosevelt was interested in wining elections.. and getting his bills passed. He was not interested in being an a hole and loseing support.
The one way to help the Democrats not look so bad is for Republicans get down in the gutter and be just as nasty.
I am always amazed at the people who urge the Republicans to follow the totally failed tactics of the Democrats. The Democratic media is being soundly defeated by Fox. The Democrats have lost the Presidency, the House, Senate, and most State Houses and State Legislatures. I guess people just want Republicans to be as nasty as Democrats so they can do as badly at the polls as Democrats.
FYI Sen. Byrd was a "former" Kleagle in the KKK. A Kleagle is a recruiter for the klan. I tell you this because the Libs can be deceptive and say "you're lying!" Sen. Byrd was never a Grand Dragon, and they'd be right.
Well, duh. 8(
Can one of our parliamentary experts weigh in on this? I thought the key precedent for the so-called "nuclear option" was established by Byrd himself, back when he was majority leader.
Of course, it wasn't called the "nuclear option" back then. It was just a novel parliamentary maneuver to force cloture, and Byrd-the-rules-expert (as opposed to Byrd-the-historian) thought it was a very clever way to outflank those wicked Republicans.
Byrd used the fillibuster to try and block passage of the Civil Rights Act in 1964.
http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/minute/Civil_Rights_Filibuster_Ended.htm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.