[DannyTN]

I think it's probable that we may be looking at variation before the flood.

To believe these remains are that old, you must believe that modern humans with a modern sized brain, twiddled his thumbs for 150,000 years. In all that time, he didn't learn to build structures, he didn't learn to write, he just merely subsisted. You would think that a culture of intelligent humans would quickly populate the earth and would begin to find advances. But instead we have very little evidence of man's existence from that time.

It's more reasonable to believe the dating is wrong than to believe the above scenario. The references at the bottom of the article has links to scientific reasons to doubt the dating.

[Conservatrix]

I believe the dating is wroing.
God is not mocked!

The reason why literal creationism seems so bizarre is that is goes against the "religion" most of us were taught in school...although all the skulls and bones used to make us evolve from little monkey have been proven to be frauds and hoaxes.

But don't confuse anybody with the facts!

[SunkenCiv]

· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic ·
	Gods Graves Glyphs	Blast from the Past. Just adding to the catalog, not sending a general distribution. To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. GGG managers are Blam, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
· Google · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology magazine · Biblical Archaeology Society · · Mirabilis · Texas AM Anthropology News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · · History or Science & Nature Podcasts · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·