[atlaw]

I see. So the new republican justifies fiscal irresponsibility by changing the subject to the evils of greed, power, and fornication.

Won't balance the books, but it makes a pretty good smoke screen.

Of course, this means that the new republican is nothing more than a democrat in Elmer Gantry's knickers. But hey, at least we have the chest-thumping high ground on "porn, creepy movies, and exploitation of cheap immigrant labor."

[GOPJ]

Odd frames. You come here and trash Republicans. Think of a person from Kansas who votes Republican and stuns Dems with an unwillingness to sell out for a dem bribe. The typical dem bribe being "you'll get someone's tax dollars if you stay with us". Here's the problem. No one believes dems, and if they did, they know dems make the same promise to anyone willing to vote for them. Then, Bush is making sure dems can't buy voters ... so those promised have even less a chace to collect. Republicans win votes and voters.

Republicans don't have to buy votes or voters. We don't have to cheat like the dems do... How do you feel about what I've said? Please answer directly -- stop constantly reframing ( the old term was "changing the subject"). If you won't answer, say so.

I've read some of your other comments and I would like to see if you can trash dems. I suspect it might be difficult for you. Give it a try. I'm waiting for your response.

I see. So the new republican justifies fiscal irresponsibility by changing the subject to the evils of greed, power, and fornication.