Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rface

It means prosecutors must follow the will of the people as expressed in the State Statutes. Of course, in adversary system,neither side should have to trust the other.

Prosecutors are looking for evidence of guilt, not evidence of innocence.


7 posted on 02/14/2005 1:40:32 PM PST by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LachlanMinnesota; WindOracle
I have wondered about something, and would like some opinions on it. It seems the libs are so intent on getting to Rush that perhaps they may be shooting themselves in the foot. Roe v Wade was not a suit about a woman's right to have an abortion. It was a PRIVACY ruling. It basically made it impossible to enforce laws, like the one in Missouri in which it is a felony to cause the death of an unborn child thru the use of an instrument. Since medical records were considered to be part of the "doctor/client privilege" neither they could be subpoenaed nor medical staff summoned and questioned, in order to build such a case. If they are able to get hold of Limbaughs medical records in this manner, have they not overturned Roe v Wade?

Here you go. Any thoughts? This one came from WindOracle

37 posted on 02/14/2005 2:00:11 PM PST by writer33 ("In Defense of Liberty," a political thriller, being released in March)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson