Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LauraleeBraswell

And your point is?


16 posted on 02/14/2005 1:44:42 PM PST by CitizenHelper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: CitizenHelper; LauraleeBraswell

Here point is this:



http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1329283/posts


29 posted on 02/14/2005 1:55:27 PM PST by writer33 ("In Defense of Liberty," a political thriller, being released in March)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: CitizenHelper; LauraleeBraswell

Her point is also this:



http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1226407/posts


30 posted on 02/14/2005 1:56:48 PM PST by writer33 ("In Defense of Liberty," a political thriller, being released in March)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: CitizenHelper

The point is, he got legal drugs legally through his doctor. Probable cause for illegal drug use or illegal drugs is not present, so why was a warrant with probabale cause issued? The prosecutor did not have permission to see Rush's records because Rush did not give it to him. You can't have it both ways.


232 posted on 02/16/2005 7:42:28 AM PST by Safetgiver (Mud slung is ground lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson