Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schwarzenegger on the State of the State (Claremont's Ken Masugi examines Ahnuld's speech)
The Claremont Institute ^ | January 7, 2004 | Ken Masugi

Posted on 01/07/2005 1:36:51 PM PST by Stoat

Schwarzenegger on the State of the State

By Ken Masugi

-----

Television allowed us to visualize the fight against "special interests" Governor Schwarzenegger is spoiling for. The tedious build-up he was given at his State of the State speech Wednesday night said almost all. (Sacbee audio here, under the story on the speech.) The silly Assembly Speaker Nunez, the investigated Secretary of State Shelley, the investigated President Pro Tem of the Senate Perata, the boorish, ponderous Lt. Gov. Bustamante (whom the Governor sarcastically congratulated for "his wonderful speech" introducing him), all those officials down to members of the State Board of Equalization. The special interests were on parade. How could Hollywood script more sleazy villains, from criminal to petty official? And villains are what the Governor needs.

The Governor's State of the State address is the initial volley in a war that will last into the fall and beyond, to the 2006 elections. He set up four major areas for reform, in which he speaks for people against the "special interests": fiscal reform (his most interesting and potentially most effective proposal), pension reform, education, and redistricting. He has called a special session of the legislature to deal with all these areas. If he doesn't get what he wants, he can call for an election involving referenda as early as this summer.

Pension reform is the easiest to pass in the special session (particularly if the changes are cosmetic). And he can get superficial education reform as well. But he called for merit pay, performance standards, and charter schools--all measures that will aggravate the teacher unions. These reforms won't work well on a referendum ballot. Can he promise the teachers something in return for changes?

The legislators responded coldly to his redistricting proposal, and even if it went through (and wasn't struck down by the Ninth Circuit as a violation of the 1965 Voting Rights Act) there is no guarantee it would change the legislature's composition appreciably. Expanding the size of the legislature would produce more interesting results, but budget and reform-conscious voters might gag at the idea of more politicians. But what if they worked part-time? What if he swapped a change in term limits? Anyway, term limits means bureaucracy protection, for they prevent the formation of a majority that has the power and will to eliminate the bureaucracy that protects "special interests.")

But the best prospect for conservatives is budgetary reform. "We don't have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem." The budget is largely on automatic pilot, with much spending mandated by initiative. He proposes another automatic system, this one cutting the budget across the board when it exceeds revenues. (Sounds fair, but wait until it is put into practice.) In order to be worth doing (at its best like Colorado's TABOR), budgetary reform would have to be done via referendum following the special session. That would be the great prize of his administration. Politically he would have the conservatives on his side (it would have to be tough enough) and enough Dems and independents to win; he can do it, especially after the special session fracas and predictable non-performance. No more Mr. Nice Guy. Schwarzenegger praised his California Performance Review as the lighted fuse that would lead to a blowing up the boxes he advocated in his first State of the State address. But this is a mixed bag as we have previously noted. The Governor sought out more villains as he proposed reforming the corrections department, building more roads, cutting regulations discouraging home construction, fostering energy production, and (at relatively little cost, or so he says) giving low-income Californians a drug discount card.

Most of this is pleasing to conservatives, especially of the market-oriented type, and it certainly should be. If these proposals don't eliminate the administrative state in California, they go a long way toward putting it in the course of ultimate extinction. The key here is to demand much of his opponents, keep the Republicans unified, and make sure public attention is focused on the Democrats' enslavement to "special interests." If he gets his way, Governor Schwarzenegger will have done the cause of liberty boundless good.



TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: ahnuld; arnold; california; claremont; claremontinstitute; rino; schwartzenrino; schwarzenegger
Ken Masugi is the Director of the Center for Local Government. Its purpose is to apply the principles of the American Founding to the theory and practice of local government, the cradle of American self-government. Dr. Masugi has extensive experience in government and academia. Following his initial appointment at the Claremont Institute (1982-86), he was a special assistant to then-Chairman Clarence Thomas of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. After his years in Washington, he held visiting university appointments including Olin Distinguished Visiting Professor at the U.S. Air Force Academy. Dr. Masugi is co-author with Brian Janiskee of Democracy in California: Politics and Government in the Golden State (Rowman & Littlefield, 2002). He is co-editor of six books on political thought, including The Supreme Court and American Constitutionalism with Branford P. Wilson, (Ashbrook Series, 1997); The Ambiguous Legacy of the Enlightenment with William Rusher, (University Press, 1995); The American Founding with J. Jackson Barlow and Leonard W. Levy, (Greenwood Press, 1988). He is the editor of Interpreting Tocqueville's Democracy in America, (Rowman & Littlefield, 1991).

He is author of numerous essays and reviews of works on political theory, constitutional law, public policy, and films. Dr. Masugi has also published in the popular press, including the Los Angeles Times, Orange County Register, Washington Post, Washington Times, National Review, and the Weekly Standard.

Tom Wolfe's Struggle With God and the Greeks
Posted on December 22, 2004

Thanksgiving's Simple Meaning
Posted on November 24, 2004

-----

Related Stories
Essays
Posted on December 14, 2004

Clarifying the California Ballot
Posted on October 29, 2004

U.C.P.C.
Posted on October 12, 2004


1 posted on 01/07/2005 1:36:55 PM PST by Stoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Bump for reference.


2 posted on 01/07/2005 1:50:29 PM PST by RhoTheta (Democrats are the coalition of the coerced and the bribed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Unfortunately, as with most articles that speculate on Schwarzenegger's proposals this one is long on the potential for these proposals and short on specifics.

Like most of these articles it also fails to mention the repetitive pattern that Schwarzenegger presents. Long on ideas, short on specifics and no accomplishments within the time frame at hand.

We heard this same rhetoric late in the fall of 2003, again in the spring of 2004 and now a third time in early 2005. Talk is cheap and the only changes that Schwarzenegger has actually accomplish has been to raise state spending 6% to the highest level in the state's history, increase per-capita taxation to the highest level in California's history, increase state indebtedness to the highest level in California's history and, of course, his propensity to keep making lofty speeches with no or little results.

You bet ya. Schwarzenegger is Austria's most well known, living citizen. Just wish he would move back.

3 posted on 01/07/2005 2:23:04 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag

Arnie's California Performance Review is underwhelming at best, and dangerous at worst. "Long on ideas, short on specifics and no accomplishments" pretty well sums it up.
The legislature is not incentivized to deliver supporting legislation and the initiative process (as mandated by the state constitution) limits initiatives to one issue. It would take a MANY initiatives to implement the few good ideas found in the agenda.
http://www.report.cpr.ca.gov/cprrpt/preschg/index.htm


4 posted on 01/07/2005 2:40:33 PM PST by RKV ( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RKV

The CPR is dangerous to constitutional government. It eliminates elected offices, forcing citizens to go to unelected bureaucrats for purposes that should be delegated to elected officials. It sets up super agencies that vest more power in the governor's office because the heads of the super agencies are appointed by the governor and not elected by the people. It changes county boundaries unconstitutionally by setting up regional government offices. Citizens lose representation in regional governments because most regional councils are appointed and do not have to honor open meeting laws like the Brown Act.

The CPR is a socialist dream consolidating power in one person (the governor) and wrests power from citizens who were formerly guaranteed the right to elected representation and a constitutional government.


5 posted on 01/07/2005 6:39:03 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

You won't find me disagreeing with that assessment. To do this constitutionally would take 200 propositions. There are a few gold nuggets in the pile of U235. Common information systems is one that I can get behind. I would note that the implementation of this is NOT free. The change from county to regional authority (e.g. for schools) is just plain awful. Look at what the Coastal Commission has done for us.


6 posted on 01/07/2005 7:27:23 PM PST by RKV ( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson