Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Galveston Opted Out of Social Security
Liberty Haven ^ | Unknown | Ed Myers

Posted on 12/20/2004 8:16:41 AM PST by katiedidit1

In south Texas, along the windswept Gulf Coast where multitudes of hurricanes have made landfall over the centuries, there are three history-filled, ahead-of-their-time counties: Galveston, Brazoria, and Matagorda.

Until the early 1980s government entities, such as cities and counties, had the right of opting out of Social Security and establishing their own retirement system. This option had been provided when the Social Security Act was passed in the thirties.

Galveston County in 1979 looked into this idea when then - County Attorney Bill Decker contacted Don Kebodeaux, highly successful Houston businessman, and asked him if he could devise a plan so that Galveston County could opt out of Social Security. At that time Social Security was on the verge of bankruptcy and no one knew what the future held. Don pondered the problem and called in his friend Rick Gornto, a leading financial expert, who was later to become his partner. These two hard-driving and foresighted businessmen, realizing the coming problems in Social Security, designed a new program for political subdivisions that would provide a retirement plan for employees that was many times better than the existing Social Security program. Satisfied with the new program, and in order to properly present and handle this program, these two Texas entrepreneurs organized several companies that became the First Financial Group.

The men from First Financial took their ideas, which they called The Alternate Plan, to Galveston County and presented them to County Judge Ray Holbrook and the Commissioners Court in 1980. When Judge Holbrook, a quiet, soft-spoken Texan, and County Attorney Bill Decker, a man dedicated to the betterment of his county, saw the wisdom and foresight of this concept they took charge and shepherded the plan through its various stages.

The beauty of the plan was simplicity itself. The 6.13 percent rate that the government had been taking out for Social Security in 1981 now would go into the pension fund for employees and would be matched by the county. Life and disability insurance were included at first to match exactly the Social Security benefits. In recent years the county increased its participation to 7.65 percent, which included payment of all premiums for life and disability insurance. The life insurance benefit for those under age 70 is 300 percent of one's annual earnings with the minimum benefit of $50,000 and a maximum of $150,000.

Many spirited debates were held throughout the county between Social Security representatives and the men from First Financial for the benefit of the county employment of 78 percent to 22 percent, the Galveston County employees endorsed the idea and the county opted out of Social Security.

The local unions fought the idea at first, and several Galveston County officials also opposed the action. As time went on and they learned more about the program, nearly all of them saw the sound judgment in this course of action. Years later Decker, by then retired, told the story of how a number of unionized county workers thanked him for his wisdom and guidance. They said at first they had serious doubts about giving up the fixed income of Social Security, but now that they were getting ready to retire they were very happy they did.

"The Alternate Plan has been a godsend for Galveston County and clearly improved employee benefits," said Judge Holbrook recently. He continued, "The 22 percent who voted against it in 1980 are all supportive now and see the many benefits of having a retirement program other than Social Security, which most employees under age forty believe will not be existing when they retire because there will not be enough workers to contribute to this pay-as-you-go system. And now no one objects to the mandatory feature which was made part of The Plan a few years after it started." Judge Holbrook, who retired in 1994 after 28 years of distinguished service, concluded his narrative by saying, "Of all the things I accomplished while county judge, setting up this retirement system for Galveston County employees is one of my proudest achievements." Now in retirement, Judge Holbrook also pointed out that after just 12 years of service under The Alternate Plan he is now receiving twice as much as he would have under Social Security.

Seeing this tremendous potential in 1982 Brazoria County followed suit and opted out of Social Security in favor of The Alternate Plan. A year later Matagorda County climbed on board.

Tolbert Newman, operations manager for the First Financial Group who handles the overall responsibility for these plans for the three counties, cites the following example of the growth that can be achieved in this Alternate Plan pension fund. If an individual is 25 years old and makes a $2,000 annual contribution for just ten years, assuming an 8 percent earnings rate, this individual will have $314,870 when he or she retires at age 65. If he works continuously for 40 years, he may well have accumulated a million dollars, depending on his contributions.

This idea began taking hold in a big way. The entrepreneurial spirit was alive and well. In a short period of time the idea spread and some 200 other counties, as well as many cities, in Texas and throughout the entire country, saw the latent possibilities of the program and were ready to become candidates to opt out and join the plan that First Financial Group had devised.

Then as these other political subdivisions began to set the wheels in motion for this farsighted change, up jumped the devil, Congress. Social Security had gone broke the year before and our legislators were now looking for ways to bail out the system. Capitol Hill had already decided to include the federal employees and then got a rude shock when it looked as though all employees of the various counties in Texas, and others throughout the country, were about to opt out of Social Security. That was a calamity it could not allow, so Congress canceled the opt-out clause in 1983. Fortunately Galveston, Brazoria, and Matagorda counties had their systems up and running and so the grandfather clause applied, and they were allowed to continue their Alternate Plan, much to the chagrin of all these other Texas counties.

The Alternate Plan that began as a fledgling, upstart employee benefit plan has stood the test of time and has shown that it can and does outperform Social Security. The plan that started in Galveston County ended the first year with a modest balance. Today, with over 5,000 employees from these three counties The Alternate Plan has grown to a very healthy and sizable portfolio. Those who retire after 20 years will receive three to four times the rate as under Social Security. This Alternate Plan is not just an isolated act of a group of responsible and dedicated Texans. There are countless other examples of other local and state government entities showing the same responsibility and initiative throughout the United States. There are now five states that are not under Social Security and have their own plans: California, Nevada, Maine, Ohio, and Colorado. In the Colorado plan they now have over $14 billion in assets. Local govern-ment entities such as police and fire depart-ments have long handled their own retirement plans.

These plans clearly demonstrate that if left alone enterprising Americans can set up re-tirement systems, second to none.

The private sector, including the self--employed, will benefit from privatizing Social Security as never before. Phasing out the employer's share of the Social Security tax will, over time, return to the business com-munity more than $169.2 billion per year. Not having to pay these FICA taxes in future years will be a tremendous boon to the business climate and the creation of untold new jobs.

Larry N. Forehand, president of the Texas Restaurant Association and founder of Casa Olé Mexican Restaurants, a fast-growing Texas restaurant chain, had this to say: "We currently pay over $1.3 million in matching Social Security taxes annually. If our company had that $1.3 million a year to invest in new locations, we could build six additional res-taurants, employ an additional four hundred fifty people and add $7.2 million to the economy every year. Based on current figures it is estimated that all restaurants in Texas will save $1.2 billion per year."

Privatization will bring a win-win situation for all.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: privatization; socialsecurity; socialsecurityreform
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 12/20/2004 8:16:41 AM PST by katiedidit1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

Thans for posting this. I read this a few years back, but could never find the info again.


2 posted on 12/20/2004 8:18:27 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

"Privatization will bring a win-win situation for all."


Galveston, oh, Galveston!


3 posted on 12/20/2004 8:19:04 AM PST by writer33 (The U.S. Constitution defines a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

bump


4 posted on 12/20/2004 8:19:46 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

Makes you think of how much of your money is wasted in Washington...


5 posted on 12/20/2004 8:21:18 AM PST by 2banana (They want to die for Islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1
Here's something I'd like to see in SS privitization:

Allow parents to open an IRA for their children. Forget this stuff about limiting IRA contributions to the level of earned income. If I could tuck away ten thousand dollars for my 6-month-old today he wouldn't have to save for his own retirement and he wouln't have to worry about whether SS was going to be around for him.

6 posted on 12/20/2004 8:21:43 AM PST by whd23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: katiedidit1

Bump for later.


8 posted on 12/20/2004 8:21:51 AM PST by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1
If you are going to reform Social security, 1st get everybody that is exempted (yeah that includes the slave masters in the schools congress, etc) to it included in it, then take those cushy funds and put it into the SS system.

Then leave it alone.

9 posted on 12/20/2004 8:22:07 AM PST by dts32041 (When did the Democratic party stop being the political arm of the KKK?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

The one thing that's omitted is the monthly checks retirees get from SS (I seem to recall $800+ per month) compared to those who opted out, which if memory serves is in the area of $3k per month. My memory may be off, however I recall the huge disparity of the two.


10 posted on 12/20/2004 8:25:16 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gohot

I would say FDR. If not the Great Socialist, then the Great TAXER LBJ.


11 posted on 12/20/2004 8:26:15 AM PST by HMFIC (US Marines, you yell, we shell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

In 1979 I was a young group insurance sales person and worked with Kebodeaux and Gornto to put the package togther. The company I worked with provided the short term disability and fixed annuties to fund the retirement benefits.

The article is dead on and it was great to hear the program worked as we had all hoped. At the time we were all hopeful that more organizations would be allowed to opt out but Federal legislation stopped what they were worried would become a mass exodus from social security.


12 posted on 12/20/2004 8:26:29 AM PST by BubbaBobTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

Great article


13 posted on 12/20/2004 9:08:09 AM PST by chaosagent (It's all right to be crazy. Just don't let it drive you nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: writer33
"Privatization will bring a win-win situation for all."

You're mostly right, but a workable privitization plan would be a MAJOR loss for the Democrats who want to keep everybody under their thumb.

14 posted on 12/20/2004 9:13:10 AM PST by scooter2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

Thanks for the post. Very valuable information.


15 posted on 12/20/2004 9:27:32 AM PST by dix (Remember the Alamo, and God bless Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scooter2

"You're mostly right, but a workable privitization plan would be a MAJOR loss for the Democrats who want to keep everybody under their thumb."


But wouldn't it be so fun to do it. Even if only to annoy Democrats. Lord forbid we actually save Social Security. :)


16 posted on 12/20/2004 9:55:06 AM PST by writer33 (The U.S. Constitution defines a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

Why doesnt Bush bring this example to the main stream media? this is the best example for privatization I have ever read!! look at the big profits the people made.


17 posted on 12/20/2004 10:43:45 AM PST by katiedidit1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VOA

Wonder if this is worth forwarding to Rush Limbaugh


18 posted on 12/20/2004 10:45:10 AM PST by katiedidit1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1
Why doesnt Bush bring this example to the main stream media?

Ya got me.

19 posted on 12/20/2004 10:46:44 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

Link doesn't work. Please provide correct link.


20 posted on 12/20/2004 12:47:39 PM PST by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson