[andie74]

IMAGINE THAT! 34% of Rats angry at Bush!

[Remember_Salamis]

There'll be a Hillary-Rudy matchup, but it will be in 2006! The Kerik Fiasco has almost assured that Rudy will settle for the Senate seat in 2006. There wasn't much of a chance that he would win a primary outside of NEw England with his pro-infanticide, anti-gun stance.

[Graybeard58]

I am waiting for the inevitable post hyping a Rudi/Condi ticket - Then we can have a solid pro abort ticket with at least one gun grabber on it.

[MisterRepublican]

"... and only 4% express anger toward her..."

Tells me this "poll" is crap.

[sport]

They already had one.

Rudy backed out.

2000 I believe it was.

[Always Right]

I wonder is Hillary will even run for the Senate in 2006? If she was smart, she would become the biggest budget-cutter and the biggest hawk in the Senate over the next couple of years, not run for Senate in 2006 (the race for 2008 begins in 2006 and she might actually lose the Senate), move to the south and start being a faithful church goer.

[The Spirit Of Allegiance]

This pollster sounds already in the tank for the Dems.

'Caveat Pollster', good rule of thumb for the FReepohadeen

[Prime Choice]

Hell, leave Hillary in the Senate. New York deserves her.

[dsc]

Not much difference there.

They both commit adultery with other women.

[freekitty]

Hitlery has already started her slime machine against Rudy.

[Cicero]

The Daily News is in Hillary's back pocket.

[My2Cents]

In a hypothetical matchup, Giuliani and Clinton are neck and neck: 45% to 43%.

Sounds like a Rassmussen poll. If that's the case, do not expect the spread between the two to move outside the margin of error for the next four years.

[John Lenin]

This is ridiculous, Bush hasn't even finished his first term and already election 2008 has started. Four years is a loooong time and many things can happen. The only purpose talking about this serves is to diminish W 's 2nd term.