Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PEARL HARBOR + 62 POST REPOST
December 7, 2004 | Mia T

Posted on 12/07/2004 1:03:05 PM PST by Mia T

A Scoundrel's Pythagorean Imperative

Mia T, 12.14.03


z = distance between flag lapel pin and chin

d = distance between midpoint of chin and jowl

y = distance between the midpoint of chin and top button

x = distance between top button and flag lapel pin


 




 by Mia T, December 7, 2003

 












issus clinton failed to notice: 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. How fitting it is that the clintons were forced to reveal their inept and treasonous hand on this day, exactly 62 years post Pearl Harbor.

One has to surmise from hillary clinton's post-turkey, Sunday-Circuit, pink-suited panic that clinton in-house polling has the missus out-polling Jane Fonda for the Tokyo-Rose prize.

ASIDE: Someone ought to clue in clinton's dresser: exculpation-by-pink-suit can work only once; notwithstanding, a treasonous middle-aged matron in a pink suit reads: "dowdy treasonous middle-aged matron in pink suit"... or to the sharper subset, "fatuous dowdy treasonous middle-aged matron in pink suit attempts ingénue exculpation ploy." What could they be thinking? Surely, clinton "infrastructure" knows that such a scheme requires freshness of face, not mouth....

It is common knowledge that missus clinton limits the frequency, intensity and content of her cozy clintonoid interviews of the Colmes kind. Tim Russert's (Meet the Press, NBC) stomach-turning HILLARY 2004! boosterism and nonexistent follow-ups ("And why do you suppose there aren't enough troops to fight a war, missus CLINTON?") made it clear that she had the latter two -- intensity and content -- covered today. It was frequency that did her in.

Tokyo Rose also aided and abetted our enemies by using psychological warfare designed to lower the morale of our troops; and she was convicted of treason. One could easily argue that clinton's betrayal, because it is ultimately self-serving, is an even greater iniquity. And then, of course, there are the clintons' other self-serving treasonous acts....

 

Russert, therefore, was not only on the wrong page. He was in the wrong book.

The question isn't,
"Who in his right mind would ever want the clintons back in the Oval Office?"

The question is,--
"Who in his right mind would want the seditious,
America-undermining clintons unconfined?"
 

hillary talks: ON MILITARY TACTICS
("The Easy Part")

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)



hillary talks:ON TERROR

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

hillary's Iraq Turkeys


1996 -- Another Self-Serving clinton Thanksgiving Jaunt

MORE  



deconstructing clinton… "just because I could"

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

virtualclintonlibrary.blogspot.com
missus clinton's REAL virtual office update
http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com
http://virtualhillary.blogspot.com
http://virtualclintonlibrary.blogspot.com
http://www.hillarytalks.us
http://www.hillarytalks.org
fiendsofhillary.blogspot.com
fiendsofhillary.us
fiendsofhillary.org
fraudsofhillary.com

johnkerryisdangerousforamerica.blogspot.com

 

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2004



TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: billclinton; clinton; clintons; hillaryclinton; iraq; missusclinton; pearlharbor; sedition; traitors; treason

1 posted on 12/07/2004 1:03:06 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Are the Clinton's controversial ?


2 posted on 12/07/2004 1:07:00 PM PST by TYVets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Wolverine; Lonesome in Massachussets; IVote2; ...

ping


3 posted on 12/07/2004 1:07:01 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
"The question isn't, "Who in his right mind would ever want the clintons back in the Oval Office?"
The question is,-- "Who in his right mind would want the seditious, America-undermining clintons unconfined?"

I'm with you, Mia T...MUD

4 posted on 12/07/2004 1:58:16 PM PST by Mudboy Slim (RE-IMPEACH the HildaBeast's Hubby!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

.


5 posted on 12/07/2004 4:43:30 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
One has to surmise from hillary clinton's post-turkey, Sunday-Circuit, pink-suited panic that clinton in-house polling has the missus out-polling Jane Fonda for the Tokyo-Rose prize. -- ! I'll never forget the puff-piece, love-in, suck-face interview that Russert offered Satan's Daughter (I think) back in February!

ASIDE: Someone ought to clue in clinton's dresser: exculpation-by-pink-suit can work only once; -- "exculpation-by-pink-suit" -- beautiful - sort of like Scott Peterson's mother today crying on the witness stand to save his life.

notwithstanding, a treasonous middle-aged matron in a pink suit reads: "dowdy treasonous middle-aged matron in pink suit"... or to the sharper subset, "fatuous dowdy treasonous middle-aged matron in pink suit attempts ingénue exculpation ploy." -- it just gets better.

6 posted on 12/08/2004 3:30:26 AM PST by beyond the sea (I know beyond a doubt ...... my heart will lead me there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson