Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drought Unearths a Buried Treasure
NY Times ^ | November 2, 2004 | SANDRA BLAKESLEE

Posted on 11/30/2004 6:46:03 PM PST by neverdem

ESCALANTE, Utah - In the early 1960's, the nation's environmental movement cut its baby teeth on a fierce battle to stop construction of dams along the Colorado River. Two proposed dams were never built, but Glen Canyon dam, located in an unprotected area, was completed in 1963. Over the next 17 years, water backed up for 186 miles, forming Lake Powell and inundating Glen Canyon and hundreds of miles of side canyons.

The defeat was deeply felt. David Brower, who was executive director of the Sierra Club, called the death of Glen Canyon the greatest disappointment of his life. Edward Abbey, the mischievous author and defender of the natural world, called Glen Canyon the "living heart" of the Colorado River and Lake Powell a "blue death." He often spoke of floating a houseboat filled with explosives to the base of the dam to get rid of "Lake Foul."

What Mr. Abbey and the Sierra Club couldn't or didn't do nature has now accomplished. A severe Western drought - some say the worst in 500 years - is shrinking Lake Powell at the rate of up to a foot every four days. Since 1999, the vast reservoir has lost more than 60 percent of its water.

Glen Canyon is returning. It is open and viewable in much of its former glory. At the confluence of Coyote Creek and Escalante River, where boaters once motored by to see famous rock formations, backpackers now pick their way up a shallow river channel. Fifteen-foot high cottonwoods grow amid thickets of willow, gamble oak and tamarisk. Where fish thrived, mountain lions prowl.

The change may be permanent.

"Short of several back-to-back years with 100-year runoff, Lake Powell will never be full again," said Dr. Tom Myers, a hydrologic consultant in Reno, Nev. Downstream users now consume 16.5 million acre-feet of water, but on average only 15 million acre-feet flow into the system each year, he said. Add more than a million acre-feet of water lost to evaporation and it is obvious that only during relatively wet years is it possible to add water.

The struggles over Glen Canyon and the other dams on the Colorado River above the Grand Canyon were among the battles that led to the National Environmental Policy Act, the Endangered Species Act and clean air and water legislation. Among these successes, the dam was a defeat that has not been forgotten. In 1981 the radical environmental group Earth First! unfurled a 300-foot-long sheet of plastic shaped like a crack down the dam's face.

Now, Dr. Richard Ingebretsen, a physician and founder of the Glen Canyon Institute in Salt Lake City, a group dedicated to draining Lake Powell and restoring Glen Canyon to its natural state, says: "The drought is a godsend. Now is the chance for us to have the national debate we didn't have 40 years ago. With the lake so low, people can see what was lost, the life cycles, the ecosystem. There is a powerful beauty here that can change people's minds."

The changes are stunning. When it was full five years ago, the lake had 250 square miles of flat water and thousands of miles of fractal shoreline. Each year, two and a half million people came to enjoy vacations with boating, swimming, fishing. The lake was rimmed by a starkly beautiful landscape; filmmakers shot movies like "Planet of the Apes'' and "The Greatest Story Ever Told.''

Today the lake is down 129 feet, back to the size it was in 1970, covering 131 square miles. Canyon walls are plastered with a chalky white bathtub ring of calcium carbonate 10 stories high, where the water once reached. Towering benches of silt line the former lake bed. This year 1.8 million visitors are expected.

"The lake is still beautiful," said Char Obergh, an information officer for the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area in Page, Ariz. "People can see more features than ever with the water low."

Paul Ostapuk, a spokesman for Friends of Lake Powell in Page, said: "Droughts are a regular part of the Colorado River. The lake draws down and it fills up again.'' In the meantime, he said, families can still get together on the lake for a wonderful time.

In two years, depending on the weather, Lake Powell could reach what hydrologists call inactive pool, meaning the water stored in the lake will not produce enough flow to generate hydroelectric power. A year or two after that, water could drop another 120 feet.

At that point, because of the steepness of canyon walls at the dam, Lake Powell would still have two million acre feet of water spanning 32 square miles, offering continued recreation opportunities.

At that same point, hundreds of miles of side canyons would emerge into sunlight offering backpackers a chance to see what was lost. In an expedition down the Colorado River in 1869, John Wesley Powell provided English names for dozens of features like Tapestry Wall, 1,000-foot-high sand dunes frozen into rock and stained with veils of black desert varnish, and Music Temple, a vast grotto of sinuous stone where a person could hum a note for one second and still hear it resonating 11 seconds later.

Canyons that would be exposed include Dungeon, Labyrinth, Anasazi, Iceberg, Moki, Last Chance, Mystery Rock, Hidden Passage, Twilight and Lost Eden.

Already some features are back, including a stretch of Imperial rapids and a Native American sarcophagus that once held a mummy, now stored in a nearby museum.

But the side canyons are the real miracles of Glen Canyon, said Chris Peterson, executive director of the Glen Canyon Institute who started revisiting the Escalante River at Coyote Creek in 1999. That year the lake was down only a short distance, he said, but a riot of plants had sprung to life overnight.

Dr. David Wegner, an expert on canyon ecology and the president of Ecosystem Management International in Durango, Colo., explained why. First, most side canyons are made of porous Navajo sandstone, which has acted like a huge sponge for 30 years. As the reservoir drops, the stone can't drain as quickly. That water steadily trickles out, feeding the desert ecosystem. Second, the retreating lake leaves sediment loaded with nutrients. Seeds that fall germinate quickly in the shade. Insects, amphibians and birds come back followed by rodents, raccoons, deer and panthers.

Glen Canyon has been called a lost Eden, largely because the conditions are perfect for life. The side canyons, with deep shade and sculptured grottoes, were always the ecological pump for much of the life in the Grand Canyon and beyond, Dr. Wegner said.

Last spring Mr. Peterson and his colleagues began leading small groups down the Escalante River to see the recovery firsthand. This fall, trekkers can walk 15 miles downriver, barefoot, marveling at the sights, sounds and smells.

To everyone's surprise, the bathtub ring is disappearing rapidly. Summer monsoons are washing it away.

There is very little human garbage in the shin-deep river that runs through the old lake bed. On a recent exploration, hikers saw only a plastic bucket and a bottle. The air smells sweet. Clear springs flow out of newly exposed rock. The river bottom is the consistency of confectioner's sugar, a very soft silt that is prone to form pockets of quicksand. As attractive as the exposed canyon is, hiking there can be challenging. It is already possible to explore small side canyons.

Scrambling up and into one of these grottoes is to enter a world of haunting beauty. Out on the river, the air is hot and dry. Suddenly the world turns cool, dark, quiet. Sheer and curved walls of red, orange and ocher-colored rock hold hanging gardens of maidenhair ferns. There are datura often painted by Georgia O'Keeffe, along with orchids, scarlet monkey flowers and cave primrose.

One recent visitor, Alvin Colville, a retired rancher from Del Norte, Colo., first came to Glen Canyon in 1962 when he was 31. "These side canyons are what called me back," he said, hoisting a pack onto his back. "They're small, cozy, quiet, magnificent. In many places you could touch both walls. The sky was a little blue slot up above."

Harry Garabedian and Betsey McNaughten of Deering, N.H., were also on the Escalante River recently on a weeklong hiking trip. "It's beautiful to watch the full moon bounce up over the cliff tops," Mr. Garabedian said. But the lakeshore bears witness to recent years. "Every rock you turn over has toilet paper under it from the years this was a campsite for boats."

Mr. Peterson said there was one side canyon farther downstream that he could hardly wait to visit on foot. The size of two football fields, overhung with glowing orange and red rock, Cathedral Canyon is perhaps the most famous lost feature in Glen Canyon. To Edward Abbey it was grander than all the cathedrals in Europe. It was a place where he expected to see "a rainbow colored corona of blazing light, pure spirit, pure being, pure disembodied intelligence, about to speak my name."

Five years ago it was under 140 feet of water; now, just 18. Last year it had a waterfall five feet high. This summer a monsoon cleared out silt so that the waterfall is now 20 feet high. If it is speaking Mr. Abbey's name it is whispering now, but if the water keeps receding, it may soon be shouting.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado; US: District of Columbia; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: coloradoriver; dam; davidbrower; ecotwits; edwardabbey; glencanyon; glencanyondam; lakepowell; river; sierraclub; sierraschlub
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: MARTIAL MONK

January 1993?


21 posted on 11/30/2004 7:34:48 PM PST by DuncanWaring (...and Freedom tastes of Reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"Short of several back-to-back years with 100-year runoff, Lake Powell will never be full again," said Dr. Tom Myers, a hydrologic consultant in Reno, Nev."

BS. Precipitation is cyclical, the lake will be full again at some point. Back-to-back 100 year storms are a statistical improbability, and the bottom line is that the hydro-power dam has been good for society as a whole.

22 posted on 11/30/2004 7:34:52 PM PST by yooper (If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
"of course the glen canyon operators could add a siphon to a deeper place, to keep the turbines running."

You'll need Barney Frank to suck the tube of a siphon large enough to provide the flow the hydro plant is designed for.

23 posted on 11/30/2004 7:39:25 PM PST by yooper (If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yooper

We had back to back 100 yr rains in May-June '03 here in IN


24 posted on 11/30/2004 7:42:16 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

It is not that simple. The turbines have to turn at a fixed rate to produce 60 cycle electricity. To do that you can either vary the flow of water past the impellers or very the flow of water into the impellers. When the dam was built, the engineers who designed the turbines were given a set of paramaters aboue how much head (or how many feet of water) would be above the impellers and from that they could calculate how much electricity could be produces and then they designed the impellers to work within those parameters. I suspect that if the water level drops below 3490, the impellers simply will not turn the turbines at the correct speed.


25 posted on 11/30/2004 7:42:17 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (God is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

No. Before that. 93 was the year that they thought the dam was going to fail and flush Phoenix clean down to Yuma.


26 posted on 11/30/2004 7:43:31 PM PST by MARTIAL MONK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MARTIAL MONK
I wonder how Glen Canyon will be able to meet its regular requirements for water release, i.e., Mexican treaties, Humpback chub, etc.? I had thought they had just completed a release for sandbar building?

Muleteam1

27 posted on 11/30/2004 7:45:28 PM PST by Muleteam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Or with not enough force to drive the generators. That's why the water has to fall so far - the generators require lots of HP to spin.


28 posted on 11/30/2004 7:45:37 PM PST by datura (It's Time To Destroy The UN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: digger48
Didn't say it was impossible; just said it was improbable. The "100 Year" is the key. That title is derived from the statistical probability of it happening. Consequetive 100 year storms are certainly improbable in Indiana, though as you say, it could happen, because it did happen. It is more probable in states prone to huricanes.

The point I was trying to make is that the lake will fill itself again, whether through consequetive 100 year storms (unlikely), or through normal cyclical precipitation (guaranteed).

29 posted on 11/30/2004 7:49:08 PM PST by yooper (If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
Not that you couldn't move water, but to get the proper hydraulic pressure, you are going to need drop. The siphon wouldn't help you there.
30 posted on 11/30/2004 7:53:00 PM PST by SampleMan ("Yes I am drunk, very drunk. But you madam are ugly, and tomorrow morning I shall be sober." WSC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: digger48

As an Indiana boy, I just LOVE that area of Utah!

Too bad so many Califorians are fleeing Eastward, buying up what was cheap property and raising property prices so much that long time locals can't afford to live their any more!

Poor ol' Moab: whoda thunk!?


31 posted on 11/30/2004 7:53:15 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
"I suspect that if the water level drops below 3490, the impellers simply will not turn the turbines at the correct speed."

Correct. With hydro dams it's a matter of water volume measured against time (flow), and head pressure. And now I'm inadvertantly back to "head pressure" and "Barney Frank."

Please stop setting me up like this........

32 posted on 11/30/2004 7:53:17 PM PST by yooper (If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

PC BS. Nuff said.


33 posted on 11/30/2004 8:02:04 PM PST by Ursus arctos horribilis ("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Muleteam1
The water will be held in Lake Mead, behind Hoover. There isn't enough water for the compacts and the feds are ready to step in and redivide if the states can't agree. Las Vegas and California will be hurt most. Arizona is still pumping underground.

The recent settlement with the Indians will free a lot of CAP water for purchase but it is as expensive as the devil - $1500 an acre foot.

34 posted on 11/30/2004 8:02:22 PM PST by MARTIAL MONK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ProudVet77

I'm talking about dams on rivers creating reservoirs for drinking water. Apparently, you're talking about moveable sea walls for protecting against storm surges. I trust Boston still has a functioning harbor. A needed reservoir won't be breached.


35 posted on 11/30/2004 8:07:21 PM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Lake Powell is by far the most beautiful lake on planet earth. Yet Environmentalists are busy draining it as fast as they can. Just the last few days they've opened the flood gates on the already low lake, just to provide an artificial "flood" in the Grand Canyon that will build a few temporary sand bars.

They're in love with the words of John Muir, but they can't see that they're destroying an environmental masterpiece, just because it happens to be "man-made".

This "buried treasure" is all over that area of the southwest. Thousands upon thousands of acres of it, that all looks the same. But bury some fraction of it with a beautiful, but man-made lake, and the enviros go nuts.

The fact that it will put thousands of people out of work that depend on lake revenue will get their rocks off too. They love destroying the US economy.

36 posted on 11/30/2004 8:18:06 PM PST by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProudVet77

The dam along Devil's River, Del Rio, Texas has not been full for years. Some felt it might never fill again because Mexico was taking so much of the water. Guess what? The last count I had it liked just a few feet (less than ten) of being full.


37 posted on 11/30/2004 8:28:30 PM PST by Faith-Hope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
"the glen canyon operators could add a siphon to a deeper place, to keep the turbines running."

You might want to re-think the physics of that idea! The electrical output is proportional to the height of the head of water being supplied to turn the generators. The depth of the siphon is subtracted from that height. TANSTAAFL.

--Boot Hill

38 posted on 11/30/2004 8:29:24 PM PST by Boot Hill (Candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo, candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Boot Hill
wait till this glob of sun stuff lands on the region....talk about drought!


39 posted on 11/30/2004 8:34:31 PM PST by vger (freeping since '96!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Silly me.
I saw the word "treasures" and visualized human artifacts, or other archeological possibilities. Instead we get a propaganda commercial for the Bug and Bunny crowd.

For whatever it's worth, 2.5 million visitors annually must have approved of the lake. I doubt if the "treasures" attracted one-tenth that number before the dam.

It can certainly be argued that the lake, when it was full, exposed a different set of "treasures" every bit as desireable as the present ones. The only difference now is the agenda.

Great and slick propaganda piece, though, by the Bugs and Bunny crowd.

40 posted on 11/30/2004 8:49:30 PM PST by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson