Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For politics' sake - Artists can't fathom why John Kerry lost
The World Magazine ^ | 11-19-04 | by Gene Edward Veith

Posted on 11/19/2004 6:40:55 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

 

The prize for the most unintentionally humorous reason given by a liberal for why President Bush defeated John Kerry—in a contest with many entries—has to go to Alan Woods, an Ohio State drama professor quoted in the Chicago Tribune: "We are now reaping, in election results, the consequences of the colossal reductions in art education."

Mr. Woods was trying to figure out why Americans reelected the president even though the nation's artists told them not to.

Bruce Springsteen organized his fellow rock stars into the Vote for Change tour, with John Mellencamp, the Dave Matthews Band, Pearl Jam, R.E.M, the Dixie Chicks, James Taylor, and others staging concerts to elect Mr. Kerry. Rapper Eminem put out an anti-Bush video. P. Diddy put out "Vote or Die" T-shirts and got multitudes of rap fans to register to vote, and not for Mr. Bush.

Hollywood did its part to instruct the masses, Fahrenheit 9/11 being only one of the anti-Bush movies. Documentaries almost never make it into mainstream movie theaters, but just before the election the local multiplex was playing fare like Bush's Brain (on the president's sinister Svengali, Karl Rove), The Hunting of the President (on the vast right-wing conspiracy that tried to overthrow Bill Clinton), Outfoxed (unveiling the shocking secret that Fox News is conservative), and Going Up River (about the thrilling exploits of John Kerry).

Theatrical releases too were designed to inform the American public about the issues. The Day After Tomorrow hyped global warming and the supposed consequence of the current administration's failure to sign the Kyoto treaty. The Manchurian Candidate remade the classic about a Communist attempt to take over the country into a conspiracy theory about big business controlling the political process so it can profit from a war in Iraq. Silver City made a parody of President Bush the villain in a murder mystery.

The more serious arts establishment also mobilized to defeat President Bush. The drama scene featured The Bushie Plays and W! as well as anti-Bush ridicule written into the Broadway hits Avenue Q and Hairspray. Museums and art exhibits also did their part. Celebrities campaigned, patrons gave money to the Democrats and their 527 funds, and many arts professionals did mundane tasks such as work on the get-out-the-vote effort for Mr. Kerry.

And all to no avail! What is wrong with this country, that it doesn't listen to its artists? Mr. Woods has concluded that America just does not understand art, and that's what we get for cutting back on art education.

To be sure, there were also conservative artists glad that President Bush was reelected, not all of whom were in the field of country music. But the question remains: Aren't the arts, for good or for bad, influential? How is it that all of these artists had so little impact on the country whose culture they supposedly embody?

First of all, an artist's opinion about politics, government, or public policy is not necessarily better than anybody else's. An artist, by virtue of his art, is no authority on topics such as nuclear physics, economics, theology, or other spheres outside his calling.

An artist's sphere of expertise is his art. That may entail the ability to pretend to be someone else, the ability to play a musical instrument, the ability to make up rhymes really fast, the ability to draw pictures, or the ability to tell a story. These may be valuable gifts that can enrich our lives and contribute to the overall culture. But they do not entitle artists to be rulers.

Mr. Woods seems to think that art education, fully funded, would teach children to do what artists tell them to do. But genuine art education would teach them about art. That would include understanding what a work of art is saying, so that the child could accept or reject its message. It would also teach discernment about artistic quality. That would go against the current assumption that art is simply whatever an artist does.

Many of today's artists have swallowed uncritically the bohemian myth, that the artist is superior to lesser mortals and the source of meaning and values. The best artists, though—Shakespeare, Bach, Rembrandt—had no such pretensions. They did not see themselves as creating either their art or their culture out of their own genius. Rather, they looked outside themselves to an objective realm of order and beauty created by Someone other than themselves



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: election2004; kerrydefeat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 11/19/2004 6:40:56 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

For pete's sake, these guys should have recognized you just can't trust John Kerry. That's why we all voted "Anybody But Kerry"!


2 posted on 11/19/2004 6:42:32 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"We are now reaping, in election results, the consequences of the colossal reductions in art education."

LOL. I say we cut their budget some more...

3 posted on 11/19/2004 6:42:52 AM PST by Drango (Those who advocate robbing (taxing) Peter to pay Paul...will always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"Artists" usually live in a make-believe world.
Reality bites them on the a$$.
4 posted on 11/19/2004 6:43:03 AM PST by grobdriver (Let the embeds check the bodies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Some Freeper's tagline reads something like this "Never argue with an idiot you'll lose everytime, they've just had too much practice"

Love it!


5 posted on 11/19/2004 6:43:42 AM PST by odoso (Millions for charity, but not one penny for tribute!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Former water-colorist who became a political powerhouse?

'Nuff said.


6 posted on 11/19/2004 6:44:41 AM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver

Absolutely. The leftist elitism and intelligensia truly believe anyone who voted for Bush is stupid. These are the people that believe socialism is utopia.


7 posted on 11/19/2004 6:45:32 AM PST by kx9088
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

It may be that the American people think these so-called 'artists' are too full of themselves to be taken seriously on serious issues!


8 posted on 11/19/2004 6:46:18 AM PST by NoClones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

John Kerry was a bad candidate. No artist support was going to make a difference in him winning. The "old media" could not even do it.


9 posted on 11/19/2004 6:46:22 AM PST by Moconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Many artists thought thru arts we can find 'the essence of life'... And they don't bother to learn about anything else.


10 posted on 11/19/2004 6:48:13 AM PST by paudio (Four More Years..... Let's Use Them Wisely...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
"We are now reaping, in election results, the consequences of the colossal reductions in art education."

No, you're just reaping the results, the consequences of the "shut-up-and-sing" movement.

11 posted on 11/19/2004 6:49:04 AM PST by Terabitten (Live as a bastion of freedom and democracy in the midst of the heart of darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

They can tell themselves that they lost due to electile dysfunction..


12 posted on 11/19/2004 6:49:10 AM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: odoso

Kinda like "Never wrestle with a pig in the mud; the pig likes it and you'll get dirty."


13 posted on 11/19/2004 6:49:40 AM PST by kahoutek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I say its time to bring back the concept of the "starving artist". Let's start with eliminating the National Endowment for the Arts and all funding and support for PBS. Then we can let the marketplace perform its magic.

(I claim dibs on sales of black berets and begging bowls in blue states).

14 posted on 11/19/2004 6:54:35 AM PST by asgardshill (November 2004 - The Month That Just Kept On Giving)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Bruce Springsteen organized his fellow rock stars into the Vote for Change tour, with John Mellencamp, the Dave Matthews Band, Pearl Jam, R.E.M, the Dixie Chicks, James Taylor, and others staging concerts to elect Mr. Kerry. Rapper Eminem put out an anti-Bush video. P. Diddy put out "Vote or Die" T-shirts and got multitudes of rap fans to register to vote, and not for Mr. Bush

Yeah, Alan Woods is correct.
We should have taken the advice of these political mental giants. Why I'll bet that the Dixie Chicks even graduated from High School! Of course none of the rest did (IIRC) but so what, High School dropouts have brains too. Why many HS dropouts have went on to be .. ah.. hmmm... well... Rock Stars.

And so what if James Taylor was a HEROIN JUNKIE for about twenty tears, junkies can have deep meaningful thoughts - just don't let one around your children. And P. Diddy was found not guilty of that shooting, so all should be forgiven.

Yep, 'mr' Woods is right, we should have listened to these "artists".

/s

15 posted on 11/19/2004 7:00:08 AM PST by Condor51 (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Gen G Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango

Was there no art before government subsidies were provided ?


16 posted on 11/19/2004 7:00:37 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I love reading this as a member of the design community in NYC.


17 posted on 11/19/2004 7:01:40 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango; muawiyah; paudio; NoClones; PARodrig; rmlew; lavrenti
Trust me, the NEA and NEH are employers of first resort for people who have no freakin' talent whatsoever.

I'd sooner accept the political wisdom of a cracked up bum living in the Marlboro Houses than listen to some pretentious a-hole who writes for the New Yorker.

In this case, I think that the advice of William F. Buckley would suffice.

18 posted on 11/19/2004 7:01:43 AM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham ("They don't want some high brow hussy from NYC explaining to them that they're idiots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

bttt


19 posted on 11/19/2004 7:01:57 AM PST by meema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

"Serious arts establishment"???? It doesn't exist in the USA. Vulgar "avant garde" mediocrity is piled end on end, and the Blue states (especially New York and California) have seen to that.


20 posted on 11/19/2004 7:06:35 AM PST by gaspar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson