Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GeneralHavoc

Would it be irrational to at least lay out the pros and cons of all this? Is there NO chance that Santorum is making a calculated move in the pursuit of goals we share? The knee jerk is to say he's betrayed us, but are we sure of that?


6 posted on 11/17/2004 10:48:26 AM PST by Huck (The day will come when liberals will complain that chess is too violent .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Huck; Josh in PA

I think you and Josh are on to something -- Santorum will not sell conservatives out. You can bet he has extracted a pretty hefty price from Specter in order to become Chairman. I know Inhofe stated that if Specter crosses the line, the votes are there to oust him, and he will lead the charge.

Bet the Bush nominees sail through the Senate with everyone watching Specter -- he either gets on board with the Bush agenda or gets out of the way. Believe he decided that getting with the agenda was a better option.

Like Josh, I don't like Specter either.


46 posted on 11/17/2004 11:15:13 AM PST by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- Thanks Oklahomans for giving Pres Bush the win in all our counties!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Huck
Would it be irrational to at least lay out the pros and cons of all this? Is there NO chance that Santorum is making a calculated move in the pursuit of goals we share? The knee jerk is to say he's betrayed us, but are we sure of that?

Wouldn't want to do that, now, would we?

55 posted on 11/17/2004 11:20:34 AM PST by Howlin (I love the smell of mandate in the morning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Huck

I dunno. I like Rick, and can't help but think he's doing what he feels is the right thing.

Plus, if I understand correctly, Arlen Sphincter says Santorum is helping him. Santorum has not said this recently, so we don't really know what is true.


64 posted on 11/17/2004 11:27:01 AM PST by RockinRight (The Left's train of thought has derailed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Huck

My take: Lay off Santorum.

The CJ is a sick man and there will be a CJ nomination and an associate justice nomination in a couple months. I will assume - because I refuse to believe my party is THAT stupid - that the leadership and committee Republicans have made clear to Arlen that the price of admission to the chair is successful confirmation of W's nominations, including Justice Thomas to CJ.

I will also assume that Arlen will not be the final word on committee staff.

I further assume that Arlen will make sufficiently recordable pledges to the leadership and committee to allow his balls to be held in safekeeping.


101 posted on 11/17/2004 1:10:32 PM PST by exDem from Miami
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Huck

"Would it be irrational to at least lay out the pros and cons of all this? Is there NO chance that Santorum is making a calculated move in the pursuit of goals we share?"

I have heard Santorum speak, and trust his passion for life. I don't understand his actions, especially in the primary. Now that Specter is back, I have to trust that Santorum knows what he is doing, and acting in good faith.

If I'm wrong I'm wrong.


128 posted on 11/17/2004 4:33:07 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson