Posted on 10/28/2004 11:30:55 PM PDT by Happygal
As if to prove that the Dan Rather forged document scandal was not just an isolated incident, CBS News was ready to run another bogus story against President Bush on "60 Minutes" -- right before the election -- until an old NBC report surfaced, showing that the great amounts of high explosives supposedly "missing" from an ammunition dump in Iraq were not there when American troops arrived on the scene more than a year ago.
Hundred of tons of these high explosives were known to have been at that ammunition dump before the war started but an NBC reporter who was with the American troops when they arrived at the dump in April 2003 saw no sign of them then. Since it was known in the spring of 2003 that these high explosives were not at that ammunition dump, why was it suddenly front page news in the New York Times on the eve of an election?
Much of the rest of the media joined in publicizing what has turned out to be a bogus story. John Kerry seized on this story and began loudly denouncing President Bush on TV for not adequately guarding high explosives that we never had.
How much can we trust anything reported by a biased media with its own political axes to grind? Thank heaven there are some alternative sources of news, such as talk radio, Fox News and the Internet.
Evan Thomas of Newsweek has estimated that media bias may add as much as 15 points to Kerry's vote. If so, Senator Kerry wouldn't even be in this race without the media's own spinning of news, even when that means using forged documents and old stale stories whose falsity was known more than a year ago.
Incidentally, might this episode have some relevance to the question of what happened to the weapons of mass destruction that intelligence agencies here and in other countries said were in Iraq before the war? By going to the United Nations, in order to avoid the charge of acting "unilaterally," the United States gave Saddam Hussein ample time to get rid of anything that he wanted to get rid of before our troops arrived on the scene.
Have you ever heard of any other country -- anywhere in history -- being criticized for taking military action "unilaterally"? That's how countries have taken military action for centuries.
Going to the UN is a formula for delay, at best. Too often it is a formula for doing nothing -- elaborate, complex and time-consuming nothing. The United Nations has long been the favorite cop-out of people who don't want to take decisive military action. Look at the UN-lovers and look at those who have for decades opposed military spending or the use of military force, and you will find that most of them are the same people -- including Senator John Kerry.
Why are so many in the media so ready to hype or suppress news according to whether it helps or hurts Bush or Kerry? It's not that the media hate President Bush or like Senator Kerry.
Almost nobody really likes John Kerry. But the Massachusetts Senator is the one hope of those who want to see power put back into the hands of those who think like the liberal media on both domestic and foreign issues.
It is not a partisan thing. The media certainly do not like a conservative Democrat like Senator Zell Miller and they like Republicans who support liberal causes like abortion or campaign finance reform.
The question is not whether the media should express opinions or give editorial endorsements favoring one candidate or another. The issue is whether their main function -- supplying information to the public -- is corrupted by double standards in how they report or withhold news that could help or hurt their favorite causes and candidates.
Unsubstantiated claims about George W. Bush's National Guard service more than 30 years ago have been hyped in the media for months, even before the forged documents were used by CBS News. But eyewitness accounts by veterans contradicting Kerry's version of his service in Vietnam have been kept out of much of the media.
There have been numerous other examples of similar double standards. When integrity is missing, that is far more dangerous than "missing" explosives
Love Thomas Sowell!
While I've been a member of Townhall since 2002, I've never posted from this source on here before.
I did a search on the title, and nothing came up.
If this is a duplicate, please delete! :-)
Which is why the Federal Election Commission got it right (by allowing 527s) and McCAIN-Findgold got it wrong. Their criminally naive legislation depended on an honorable, free press; and we flat-out don't have one any more.
Worth repeating, even if.
Sowell on Ice . .
They support the troops my ass.
Ah, the liberal media. One of the Seattle TV stations is obsessed with running anti Bush stories in the name of news. Disgusting. Bias in the media? Alive and doing its best to defeat Bush.
Townhall is usually a good source, like you I've been a daily reader for the past couple years.
the old MSM just isn't reliable anymore, at one time I used to read a MSM story, then surf around to verify it. I got so sick of doing that, I don't bother to read it anymore, plus there is so much they don't even bother to report, like all the good that has been acomplished in Iraq and Afghanistan.
They don't bother to publish all the threats that the Islamic Jihad issue, all the sermons these nuts preach daily about how they wish to kill each and every one of us, not just because we are western Christians or Jews, but ANYONE who is not a muslim, this includes the loony left who for some reason think that these fanatics are their friends. They probably get this idea from the MSM, which shows MSM even puts their own base at risk by not providing truth. They have exposed themselves in their desperate attempt to sway an election, to by-pass the democratic rights of each and every citizen of the nation.
This will be dues to pay for this disgusting, criminal action.
How come nobody checks that scumbag McCain on the utter failure and corruption of his warped brain child?
I suppose the media/DNC won't be called on the hypocrisy of their "rush to war" play, as it contradicts this recent concoction.
They support the troops my ass.
_____________________________________________________________
Count on the media to never distribute positive news going on in Iraq as long as George W Bush is President.
I think we should gather them all up, strip them naked, put panties on their heads, put them on leashes and soak them in pig fat...Oh, never mind, this would be confused for a typical weekend for them...But at least they wouldn't get into their allah heaven.
We don't need MSM to find out what's really happening in Iraq. Most of us have become proficient finding out the truth from alternate sources.
For MSM to prop up this America hating fool, John kerry, is absolutely disgusting.
Has MSM ever demanded John Kerry release his complete military records? No. They spare no expense to try find dirt on Bush however, to the point of forging doccuments.
The Dirt on Kerry is enough to keep the press busy for a year, but they WILL NOT reveal thier boys wrongdoings, probably because even back in 1971, they were part of the anti- American movement as well.
This is the scary thing to me. That the media has this kind of power, and the people in this country are so brainwashed, or brain-dead, or both. They may elect a traitor with a Marxist mindset to the highest office, and they don't even know it. But they know W once flipped the bird!
"People will think ..." (Kane's first wife)
"What I will tell them to think!" (Kane) (. . . )
"He happens to be the President, Charles, not you!" (Kane's first wife)
"A mistake that will be corrected one of these days." (Kane)
Citizen Kane
That's just it, MSM has stomped all over the constitution, by taking away the one thing that made this nation, the power of the people to elect or reject government. MSM has by-passed your right to do so, by swaying opinion through dishonest reporting.
Good article. He musta had a Beamish before he wrote it.
bttt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.