Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/25/2004 8:42:54 AM PDT by FatLoser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: FatLoser

bump


2 posted on 10/25/2004 8:45:54 AM PDT by blackeagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FatLoser

What a gay read this was. But I agree with the author that the Sixties need to return, along with my youth and about as likely. If the Sixties (and my youth) returned tomorrow, I would do exactly the same thing as I did then: buy a pawnshop guitar, learn three chords and spend my time going to parties and seducing hippie chicks. (Aahh, dear dead days.)


3 posted on 10/25/2004 8:59:08 AM PDT by NaughtiusMaximus (I'd RATHER Vote Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FatLoser; blackeagle

Fantastic article.

But his observation of early 60s TV ignores some very, very good drama series of the time. "Route 66", "The Defenders", "Ben Casey", "The Naked City". And how "The Untouchables" juxtaposed Robert Stack's wooden Elliot Ness with gangsters who were a lot more fun and interesting and multidimensional.


4 posted on 10/25/2004 9:01:01 AM PDT by Sam the Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FatLoser

The "Sixties", as they are known, did not really start until the day after the November election in 1964.


6 posted on 10/25/2004 9:09:11 AM PDT by elbucko ( Feral Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FatLoser
I pray someday that American values return to the innocent 50's. Where divorce is rare and shamed, abortion is illegal and never spoken of, attending Church was the norm and political correctness being a God fearing conservative.

How this country evolved into 50% liberals is beyond me. How anyone can buy into the religion of moral relativism and or be duped by liberal rhetoric. Now I find myself praying that percentage doesn't increase.

I never thought I could actually hate someone for their beliefs but the 60's mind set comes close.

8 posted on 10/25/2004 9:37:03 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FatLoser

"--- the bitter, polarizing ideological divisions that would open up in "The Sixties," and that persist in American politics to this day, lay in the future.
On important issues, the leading politicians in both parties, as well as the most respected Establishment figures, were essentially in agreement, sharing a broad vision of social progress allied with a firm anticommunism.

There were few serious differences within the mainstream of American thought as to what the country was essentially about.

______________________________________


Very true, in this sense. -- Most people essentially agreed with our Constitution, as written. --- It was an era of live & let live.

Then 'they' killed JFK.


9 posted on 10/25/2004 9:40:15 AM PDT by tpaine (No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another. - T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FatLoser

Interesting article. Thanks for posting it.


11 posted on 10/25/2004 9:56:34 AM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FatLoser

Good article. Might have mentioned the original Star Trek series, however. Very "early 60s." And the early James Bond movies.


14 posted on 10/25/2004 11:11:12 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Hic amor, haec patria est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FatLoser

The most dramatic event of the early 1960s was that men quit wearing hats.


15 posted on 10/25/2004 11:14:42 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: viaveritasvita

later....


18 posted on 10/25/2004 11:51:36 AM PDT by viaveritasvita (If MSM can't or won't get out the real news, we'll have to get it out ourselves. ~ Chuck Colson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FatLoser

19 posted on 10/25/2004 4:16:09 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FatLoser

20 posted on 10/25/2004 4:17:57 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FatLoser

Excellent article. Thanks for posting it.


21 posted on 10/25/2004 4:36:54 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson