Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex-Security Adviser Rips Bush Diplomacy
AP via Yahoooo ^ | 10/16/04 | AP

Posted on 10/16/2004 2:44:09 PM PDT by I_saw_the_light

x-Security Adviser Rips Bush Diplomacy

U.S. National - AP

WASHINGTON - The national security adviser under the first President Bush says the current president acted contemptuously toward NATO and Europe after Sept. 11 and is trying to cooperate now out of desperation to "rescue a failing venture" in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Brent Scowcroft, a mentor to the current national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice (news - web sites), also said in an interview published in England that Bush is inordinately influenced by Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.

"Sharon just has him wrapped around his little finger," Scowcroft told London's Financial Times. "I think the president is mesmerized."

Scowcroft said the Bush administration's "unilateralist" position was partly responsible for the post-Sept. 11, 2001, decline of the trans-Atlantic relationship.

"It's in general bad," he said. "It's not really hostile, but there's an edge to it."

Early on, he said, "We had gotten contemptuous of Europeans and their weaknesses. We had really turned unilateral."

Although slightly diminished since then, the unilateralist policies remain fundamentally little changed, Scowcroft said. Recent overtures to cooperate in Afghanistan and Iraq with the United Nations and NATO were "as much an act of desperation as anything else ... to rescue a failing venture."

On Israel and Sharon, the former security adviser said Sharon calls Bush after strongly retaliating for a Palestinian suicide attack and says: "`I'm on the front line of terrorism,' and the president says, `Yes, you are.'"

Scowcroft said Sharon "has been nothing but trouble


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; scowcroft; sharon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
What the heck is this all about?
1 posted on 10/16/2004 2:44:11 PM PDT by I_saw_the_light
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: I_saw_the_light

Scowcroft is of the James Baker/Bush41 Israel-bashing school of diplomacy.


2 posted on 10/16/2004 2:45:37 PM PDT by ambrose (http://www.swiftvets.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I_saw_the_light

Scowcroft has zero influence and probably manifests his resentment in this manner.


3 posted on 10/16/2004 2:46:36 PM PDT by verity (The Liberal Media is America's Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica; All

This is why I didn't vote for the relection of the elder Bush. He and his cabinet were no friend to Israel.


4 posted on 10/16/2004 2:46:50 PM PDT by Hildy (The really great men are always simple and true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I_saw_the_light

"Scowcroft said the Bush administration's "unilateralist" position was partly responsible for the post-Sept. 11, 2001, decline of the trans-Atlantic relationship."

B***s**t. Our "unilateralist" position is more effect than cause.


5 posted on 10/16/2004 2:47:16 PM PDT by jim macomber (Author: "Bargained for Exchange", "Art & Part", "A Grave Breach" http://www.jamesmacomber.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I_saw_the_light
Scowcroft said Sharon "has been nothing but trouble"

And therein lies the mentality of the career workers at the State Department, and much of the political elite in this country. If Israel would only go away, they could get on with their business of conducting normal relations with murderers, tyrants, and thieves. But because of Israel, they have to stand for an absolute--and of course, in diplomacy, everything is negotiable.

Go Israel!
6 posted on 10/16/2004 2:47:50 PM PDT by Terpfen (Wanted: Laura Ingraham's leopard miniskirt picture. Links welcomed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I_saw_the_light
What the heck is this all about?

Scowcroft despises Israel. He was THE man responsible in Bush 41's administration for the horrible relationship that Bush's father had with the state of Israel.

Scowcroft, from what I've seen, panders to Arabs, much like Holbrooke.

And he's just about as worthless as Holbrooke.

Of course, this slam is well-timed for him to get quoted on the Sunday shows.

I hope Bush41 calls him and tells him their friendship is over.

7 posted on 10/16/2004 2:48:00 PM PDT by sinkspur ("I swim with the alligators in the fevered swamps of traditionalism. " Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I_saw_the_light
AwJeezNotThisSheetAgain1.jpg
8 posted on 10/16/2004 2:48:22 PM PDT by dennisw (Gd - against Amelek for all generations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I_saw_the_light

Scowcroft is the worst kind of do-nothing, ultra-realist cynic. He didn't even want a decisive American victory in the Cold War - he wanted to preserve some kind of Russian superpower (Soviet or not) for reasons of "stability", which is why James Baker was sent to Kiev in '89 to say "save the USSR".

GWB won't be losing any sleep over this.


9 posted on 10/16/2004 2:48:40 PM PDT by Janan Ganesh (British passport, American soul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I_saw_the_light

Gen Scowcroft is a RINO. Period.

So, what, he thinks Mr. Kerry is right? Baloney.


10 posted on 10/16/2004 2:50:14 PM PDT by RexBeach (Before God makes you greedy, he makes you stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I_saw_the_light

I don't have enough background on Scowcroft to make an intelligent criticism- however- I do remember an editorial he wrote just before we went into Iraq. It was a scathing piece about GWB and his approach to all things foreign.

My sense is the oldtimers of GHWB's administration are still in a pre-9/11 state of mind. They look back longingly when we skated around the tough issues, formed alliances based on practical issues rather than necessarily shared values. I think GWB's rhetoric unsettles these guys.

None so blind as those who WILL not see.


11 posted on 10/16/2004 2:51:43 PM PDT by SE Mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I_saw_the_light
On Israel and Sharon, the former security adviser said Sharon calls Bush after strongly retaliating for a Palestinian suicide attack and says: "`I'm on the front line of terrorism,' and the president says, `Yes, you are.'"

This is inaccurate how?

12 posted on 10/16/2004 2:52:06 PM PDT by Restorer (Europe is heavily armed, but only with envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I_saw_the_light
Jeez, what the heck is he doing? Does he think a Kerry administration would do it better? Is he afraid that 43 will accomplish what x41 failed to do and therefore make him look bad in the process? He should be smart enough to realize how his comments will be received this close to the election. He must know the Reagan Commandment. Or did GWB pass him over for an ambassadorship that Scowcroft coveted?
13 posted on 10/16/2004 2:52:29 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Kerry: I wholeheartedly disagree with you beyond expression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I_saw_the_light

just found this-its news to me although maybe not to some of you. He's on Kofi's High Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change. That explains it to me.
http://www.un-globalsecurity.org/panel.asp


14 posted on 10/16/2004 2:52:31 PM PDT by I_saw_the_light (My vote is not anti-Kerry, its PRO-Bush!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

GHWB didn't have the most brilliant cabinet staff, or regular staff, period. Their incompetence and kowtowing to the RINO's and liberals are what cost them the election. Not perot, not clinton. They lost it all themselves.


15 posted on 10/16/2004 2:53:15 PM PDT by flashbunny (Mini-vanities=PIE pics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: I_saw_the_light
Brent Scowcroft is a Cold War dinosaur -- great in his own time but adrift in the present. I'd like to ask Gen. Scowcroft if he thinks that Europe was going to continue merrily following the US's lead in world affairs once the big-bad Soviet threat was gone? The war in Iraq is just an excuse for the Franco-German entente to stick it to Uncle Sam, nothing more.

BTW, I'd like to be a fly on the wall when Bush41 calls up Gen. Scowcroft and says, "WTF were you thinking, Brent?"

16 posted on 10/16/2004 2:54:21 PM PDT by Tallguy (If the Kerry campaign implodes any further, they'll reach the point of "singularity" by election day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I_saw_the_light

The last gasps of the dying multilateralist UN-loving Rockefeller wing of the Republican Party. Scowcroft belongs to the era of Clifford Case and William Rogers and Henry Cabot Lodge Republicans. He's just steamed because he's nowhere near the decision-making process any more.


17 posted on 10/16/2004 2:54:55 PM PDT by speedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I_saw_the_light

If Afghanistan is a "failing venture" for Scowcroft, I wonder what his definition of success might be? This guy might as well wear a button that says "Antisemitic Creep" so everyone could see where he stands without his having to open his evil mouth.


18 posted on 10/16/2004 2:57:14 PM PDT by mojito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
thanks for posting this.

I bookmarked the properties so I can use it if you're not around at the needed time. Hope you don't mind :-)

19 posted on 10/16/2004 2:58:02 PM PDT by Condor51 (May God have mercy upon my enemies, I won't. -- Gen G. Patton Jr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: I_saw_the_light
Remember, Bush '41 lost his bid for re-election. Remember also, that most of those "in the know" blamed Bush's Cabinent and "advisers", like Scowcroft, for the loss.

Having his daddy's GOP establishment people in Kerry's corner is the best thing that could of happened to '43. You could say that '41 didn't inspire much loyalty, either.

SFS

20 posted on 10/16/2004 2:58:25 PM PDT by Steel and Fire and Stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson