Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AMERICA HAS NO SHORTAGE OF OIL!
Eco-Logic Powerhouse ^ | 15 Oct 04 | US House Committee on Resources

Posted on 10/15/2004 9:25:37 PM PDT by datura

From Washington, DC...

America has no shortage of oil

Washington has a shortage of political will to let American workers go get it

By the House Committee on Resources

As oil prices climb to record highs above $50 per barrel, some have asserted that we are "running out" of this resource. In truth, we are not running out of oil in America. We can safely increase domestic production by at least 17.2 million barrels per day by 2030.

"America has no shortage of oil for the foreseeable future," House Resources Committee Chairman Richard W. Pombo (R-CA) said. "Washington has a shortage of the political will required to let American workers go get it. We have not increased domestic supply in thirty years. As a result, our dependence on foreign oil has skyrocketed to the point where we are sending $200 billion dollars overseas to import this resource. At least a fraction of that sum should be spent at home, to increase supply, lower prices, and create jobs."

"Increasing conservation and the use of renewable and alternative fuels must also be part of a balanced energy plan," Pombo continued. "That is why more than one half of the domestic recommendations in the Administration's energy plan - held up in the Senate for the last four years - targeted these goals. But like it or not, the reality is that America runs on oil right now. We cannot conserve our way out of an empty tank of gas. We have to produce more at home, and there is plenty at home to produce."

By combining conservation efforts with additional domestic production, the United States can close the gap between supply and demand to become more energy efficient. With current production and proposed development in North America, the United States could increase its supply by 17.2 million barrels per day by 2030. Click here to see how.

"Contrary to the claims of special interest groups, we can produce more energy to grow our economy, and continue environmental achievements at the same time," Pombo said. "These efforts go hand in hand. They are not mutually exclusive."

"Secure and affordable energy supplies fuel our economy - they are its lifeblood. In turn, a strong economy fuels investment in the research and technology that give us the positive environmental trendlines we see today. We cannot have one, without the other."






TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: energy; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
If you follow the link in the article above, it will take you to the references used for this article. Those references show that the US has in reserve many billions of barrels of oil, enough to stop all importation of oil for many generations. As we have suspected, it is once again our opponents who are trying so desperately to sell out our nation to outside interests. They must be stopped.

The "No blood for oil" losers need to read this. The voting public needs to read this. And we need to rub the Rats noses in this - big time.

1 posted on 10/15/2004 9:25:38 PM PDT by datura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: datura

The problem is that the same "No Blood for Oil" nutcases are the same people that stomp their hankies over the red-crested swamp gnat that might be harmed by domestic drilling operations.

No problem; these types will be the first to die when CW2 kicks off.


2 posted on 10/15/2004 9:29:19 PM PDT by clee1 (Islam is a deadly plague; liberalism is the AIDS virus that prevents us from defending ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: datura

We have a refining shortage due to enviro regs.


3 posted on 10/15/2004 9:30:49 PM PDT by Brett66 (Dan Rather, the most busted man in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clee1

You've got that right!


4 posted on 10/15/2004 9:30:52 PM PDT by datura (Let's roll? No, Lock and Load.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brett66

Certainly the economic incentive for increased refining capacity should bring about some change to that. Otherwise, we'll have to outsource our refining - but even that is better than getting the percentage of oil from overseas that we do now. And it all comes from less than stable or friendly regimes. Venezuela comes to mind, plus Saudi Arabia, Russia, Mexico, etc.

I've often wondered what oil lies beneath Israel.


5 posted on 10/15/2004 9:35:14 PM PDT by datura (Let's roll? No, Lock and Load.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: datura
Well Bent scumbag Bill let BP buy Amoco then ARCO algores old communist enabler/lackey Hammer got the Elk Hills navel reserve WHY ??
6 posted on 10/15/2004 9:36:40 PM PDT by Fast1 (Kerry Con "My only regret is I have but one Country to destroy for my presidencyā€¯)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: datura
Just wait until after the election. Soros will stop mucking about in the oil futures markets, and prices will return to a normal level.
7 posted on 10/15/2004 9:42:00 PM PDT by zeugma (Come to the Dark Side...... We have cookies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: datura

I AM RETIRED FROM A MAJOR OIL COMPANY, THIS ARTICLE IS DEAD ON TARGET.


8 posted on 10/15/2004 9:55:22 PM PDT by Ursus arctos horribilis ("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ursus arctos horribilis

There is enough oil in California to run this country for a few hundred years.


9 posted on 10/15/2004 10:05:37 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ursus arctos horribilis

Thank you.

I'm sure that it irritates the hell out of you watching the events in the energy sector today. I had no idea that our reserves were as high as they are until I read the footnotes to this study.

The obstructionism of the Rats borders on treason.


10 posted on 10/15/2004 10:05:53 PM PDT by datura (Let's roll? No, Lock and Load.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: datura

It costs $250,000 to make hole here in Texas. One out of every three wells comes up dry in a known oil field. If you are wildcatting in an unknown area, one out of every ten comes up dry. Who is willing to spend that kind of money in the U.S. when drilling costs are way lower overseas and the odds of success much higher?


11 posted on 10/15/2004 10:08:18 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: datura
Those references show that the US has in reserve many billions of barrels of oil, enough to stop all importation of oil for many generations.

Aside from what's in ANWR I'm not sure how many of those are crude oil reserves. Most are probably shale oil reserves which are harder to recover.

There's no real oil shortage in general but a $20 a barrel shortage appears to be a definite possiblity.

12 posted on 10/15/2004 10:11:22 PM PDT by Ceebass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ceebass
Here's the info from that link. The technology is here today.

Committee on Resources
resources.committee@mail.house.gov
HomePress GallerySubcommitteesIssuesLegislationHearing Archives
 

Efforts to Increase Domestic Supply Could Yield
an Additional 17.20 Million Barrels a Day by 2030

 
Increase in N.A. (Canada and U.S.) Oil Production (MM bpd) by
Description
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
NPR-A Northeast - 1
.20
.25
.35
.40
.40
NPR-A Northwest - 2
.00
.10
.15
.20
.20
ANWR - 3
.00
.30
.80
1.10
1.20
U.S. Oil Shale - 4, 5
.00
.40
2.00
3.00
4.00
AK Heavy Oil - 6
.15
.30
.50
.70
.80
U.S. Heavy Oil - 7
.00
.10
.30
.50
.50
U.S. Tar Sands - 8
.00
.10
.30
.50
.50
Enhanced CO2 Recovery - 9
.30
.80
1.20
1.70
2.00
AK OCS - 10
.15
.30
.80
1.20
1.50
Alberta Tar Sands - 11, 12
.90
1.50
2.25
3.00
4.00
Canadian Atlantic OCS - 13
.30
.60
.70
.80
.80
Canadian Pacific OCS - 14
.00
.20
.50
.80
.80
Canadian Arctic OCS - 15
.00
.20
.50
.50
.50
Totals
2.00
5.15
10.35
14.40
17.20
 
This breaks down as:
AK Onshore
.35
.95
1.80
2.40
2.60
AK Offshore - 16
.15
.30
.80
1.20
1.50
U.S. Heavy Oil & Tar Sands
.00
.20
.60
1.00
1.00
U.S. Oil Shale
.00
.40
2.00
3.00
4.00
Enhanced CO2 Recovery
.30
.80
1.20
1.70
2.00
Canada
1.20
2.50
3.95
5.10
6.10
Totals - 17
2.00
5.15
10.35
14.40
17.20

Endnotes:

1. Based upon NPR-A NE program documents. Also, USGS Fact Sheet 045-02 (2002), “U.S. Geological Survey 2002 Petroleum Resource Assessment of the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska (NPRA). This assessment concluded that technically recoverable, undiscovered oil beneath the Federal part of NPR-A likely ranges between 5.9 and 13.2 billion barrels, with a mean (expected) value of 9.3 billion barrels. An estimated 1.3 to 5.6 billion barrels of those technically recoverable oil resources are economically recoverable at market prices of $22 to $30 per barrel.

2. Based upon NPR-A NW program documents. Ibid., USGS Fact Sheet 045-02 (2002).

3. Peak oil production at ANWR (1.2 MM bpd) is shown higher than the usual estimates (0.9 MM bpd). Assumes incentives to inject excess North Slope Gas hydrates and other NS gas into the ANWR fields in order to achieve higher daily production rates. AK heavy oil production is also assisted by such incentives.

4. Bunger, James W. et al, “Is oil shale America’s answer to peak-oil challenge?”, Oil & Gas Journal, Aug. 9, 2004, p. 16. Worldwide, the oil shale resource base is conservatively estimated at 2.6 trillion bbl and is located in about 26 countries. (Dyni, John R., “Oil Shale,” USGS, rev. Feb. 27, 2003, cf [http://emd.aapg.org/technical_areas/oil_shale.htm].) Almost 80% of the world’s oil shale endowment, about 2 trillion bbl, including both eastern and western deposits, is located within the US. (Duncan, D.C., and Swanson, V.E., “Organic-Rich Shales of the US and World Land Areas,” USGS Circular 423, 1965.) Bunger et al found that US oil shale will produce higher quality oil than Alberta tar sands with less expense.

5. Johnson, H.R., Crawford, P.M., and Bunger, J.W., principal authors, Strategic Significance of America’s Oil Shale Resource, DOE Office of Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves, Volumes I (Assessment of Strategic Issues) and II (Oil Shale Resources Technology and Economics), March 2004. The report noted that the world’s remaining conventional oil resources total 2.7 trillion barrels while North America’s unconventional resources total 3.7 trillion barrels – 1.7 trillion in Alberta tar sands and 2.0 trillion in US oil shale. US oil shale is primarily found in Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, Kentucky, Ohio, and Indiana. As much as 750 billion barrels of US oil shale has a richness of 25 gal/ton or greater and could be produced with near-term adaptations of existing technology (Vol. I, p. 10). The report found that it is possible that an oil shale industry could be initiated by 2011 with an initial production of 200,000 bpd, with an aggressive goal of 2 million bpd by 2020. Ultimate capacity could reach 10 million bpd, a comparable capacity to the long-term prospects for Alberta’s tar sands. Oil shale’s direct economic value to the Nation may approach $1 trillion by 2020, not counting other equally or more valuable strategic and national security benefits that may not be fully measurable in dollars (Vol. I, p. 10).

6. Kuuskraa, V.A. and Godec, M.L., Lewin and Associates, Inc., A Technical and Economic Assessment of Domestic Heavy Oil, U.S. Department of Energy under subcontract to the Interstate Oil Compact Commission, April 1987. Report estimated that Alaska has 25 billion barrels of heavy oil in large reservoirs (each over 20 million barrels). The West Sak field alone contains more than 10 billion barrels of heavy oil.

7. Ibid. Report documented more than 100 billion barrels originally in-place in the U.S. heavy oil resource base. More than 80 billion barrels are in 248 large, heavy oil reservoirs (each over 20 million barrels). The bulk of the heavy oil resource is located in three states – California with 42 billion barrels, Alaska with 25 billion barrels, and Wyoming with 5 billion barrels. Smaller accumulations of 1 to 2 billion barrels (in reservoirs over 20 million barrels each) exist in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Arkansas. The report found that 4.5 to 9.1 billion barrels were economically recoverable at oil prices of $15 to $30 per barrel (constant 1986 dollars). At prices of $40 to $50 per barrel (1986 constant), nearly 20 billion barrels become economic. This 1987 report obviously fails to take into account technological advances since that time, nor does it assume Federal or state production incentives. Of note, more than 50 billion barrels is located in depths of less than 4000 feet. The resources documented in this report do not include resources classified as tar sands.

8. Lewin and Associates, Inc., Major Tar Sand and Heavy Oil Deposits of the United States, Interstate Oil Compact Commission in cooperation with the USGS and U.S. Department of Energy, July 1983. Report found that the total U.S. tar sand resource base is estimated at 54 billion barrels of oil. The measured in-place resource for major deposits is 22 billion barrels and the speculative resource in-place for major deposits is estimated at 31 billion barrels (not including the resource base offshore California). These resources are concentrated in Utah (20.1 BBO), Alaska (10.0 BBO), Alabama (6.5 BBO), Texas (4.8 BBO), California (4.7 BBO), and Kentucky (3.4 BBO).

9. Kuuskraa, Vello A., President, Advanced Resources International, “ ‘Stranded’ Oil Resources: The New Domestic Oil Prize,” testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives, Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources, Committee on Resources, on “Advances in Technology: Innovations in the Domestic Energy and Mineral Sector,” July 15, 2004. Of the original U.S. domestic oil resources in place of 582 billion barrels, only 183 billion barrels have been produced. There are an additional 22 billion barrels of proved reserves. 60 billion additional barrels are potentially producible with advanced CO2 enhanced oil recovery technology. CO2 EOR currently produces 200,000 bpd in the US. Mr. Kuuskraa testified that a CO2 EOR policy initiative could add 1 million bpd by 2015 and 2 million bpd by 2025.

10. Most of the offshore Alaska production will be from the Arctic, but 120,000 bbl/day in 2015; 200,000 bbl/day in 2020; 180,000 bbl/day in 2025; and 140,000 bbl/day in 2030 will be from the North Aleutian Basin/Bristol Bay per unofficial estimates by MMS. Starting in 2015, the production from the Alaska OCS could easily be two to three times larger than the estimates included in this table. The Arctic OCS has the geologic potential of including at least half a dozen Prudhoe Bay-sized accumulations.

11. Radler, Marilyn, “Worldwide Reserves Increase as Production Holds Steady,” Oil & Gas Journal, Dec. 23, 2002, p. 113. Commercial success of Alberta tar sands production resulted in the recent addition of 174 billion barrels of tar sand to Canada’s proved oil reserves. Production currently approximates 900,000 barrels per day. The Energy Information Administration’s International Energy Outlook 2003, on page 40, estimates that 1.7 trillion barrels of oil are in place within the Alberta tar sands.

12. Park, Gary, “Oil Sands Bombshell,” Petroleum News, March 14, 2004, p. 19. On March 3, 2004, a Canadian Energy Research Institute study found that over the next 13 years, production of oil from Alberta oil sands would more than double to 2.2 million barrels per day with oil prices of US$25 per barrel. Production could reach 2.8 million bpd with oil prices at US$32 per barrel and 3.5 million bpd at an “unconstrained” level.

13. Per the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board, the mean risked recoverable hydrocarbons for the Nova Scotian offshore is 3 billion barrels of oil and 33 trillion cubic feet of gas. (Hydrocarbon Potential of the Deep-Water Scotian Slope, Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board, October, 2002). Offshore Newfoundland and Labrador, as of May 2003, 2.5 billion barrels of recoverable oil and 9.9 trillion cubic feet of recoverable natural gas have been discovered. Undiscovered resources studies have resulted in estimates of an additional 6 to 12 billion barrels of recoverable oil. (Sedimentary Basins and Hydrocarbon Potential of Newfoundland and Labrador, Report 2000-01, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, Department of Mines and Energy).

14. Article, “B.C. girds for offshore drilling,” globeandmail.com, February 18, 2004. British Columbia provincial government has made an initiative to remove the offshore drilling moratoria. Per the British Columbia Ministry of Energy and Mines, the British Columbia offshore is estimated to contain at least 9.8 billion barrels of oil and 41.8 trillion cubic feet of gas.

15. Extensive oil and natural gas discoveries have been made in the vicinity of the Mackenzie River delta both onshore and offshore. Production awaits construction of a pipeline and further discoveries.

16. Although all of the AK Onshore and Offshore production is not from the North Slope or Arctic OCS, at least 95% will be. These estimates point to the need for another oil pipeline from the NS by 2020 - latest 2025.

17. EIA estimated in its 2004 Annual Energy Outlook that U.S. oil imports may reach 19.8 million barrels of oil per day by 2025.

   

13 posted on 10/15/2004 10:13:55 PM PDT by datura (Let's roll? No, Lock and Load.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TexasCowboy

PING


14 posted on 10/15/2004 10:16:14 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (GET OUT THE VOTE NOV 2 ! IF YOUR NEIGHBORS OR RELATIVES NEED A RIDE TO THE POLLS OFFER TO HELP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

In the mid-80s...I worked for a air force captain, who had bought 10 capped wells in Texas. They had been proven worthly and profitable...but he simply refused to pump at that price. I asked what price was a acceptable...and he said $50 a barrel, and I just laughed. My guess is that he finally starting to uncap those wells and will clear millions off a very modest investment in the 1980s. He always claimed that his wife's family had hundreds of wells like this...all capped and waiting.


15 posted on 10/15/2004 10:17:33 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

the funny this is that a lot of wells that were "tapped dry" are filling up again...


16 posted on 10/15/2004 10:24:01 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: datura
The obstructionism of the Rats borders on treason.

As many ways and many places that Democrats border on treason, they must have it completely surrounded!
17 posted on 10/15/2004 10:24:15 PM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; TexasCowboy

Thanks Tonk!

TC knows that We are hoarding oil here in Texas;)

"All Your Oil Belongs to us"

BTW TC Happy Birthday- 29 again, right?


18 posted on 10/15/2004 10:27:39 PM PDT by ChefKeith (Life is GREAT with CoCo..........NASCAR...everything else is just a game!(Except War & Love))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: datura
The ugliest most uninhabitable parts of our country such as the Alaska wilderness wasteland are overflowing with oil to bring onto the market. Bush needs to, by EXECUTIVE ORDER, open the spickets and set the price at $20 per barrel.

This is not like forcing price controls on the free market because govt. has authority over these oil reserves. The Democrats would do it in a second and we would point our finger at them saying "but they were all against us drilling..." and our cries would amount to nothing, they weren't serious, they were playing "paralyze the Republican" games.

Just look at John Kerry talking about giving nuclear fuel to Iran for "peaceful purposes" when liberals have been calling nuclear power the most evil thing on earth for decades.

I hope Bush isn't getting advice from these Saudi invested companies that will lose money if we start drilling here at home. You can read about Exxon and these types who are against homeland drilling because they are totally tooled for Middle East drilling and more drilling here will take a bite out of their profits by putting more oil on the market.

Being "conservative" and saving these reserves for a rainy day is suicide because the Democrats would drill the heck out of it...they are the same people who would empty our strategic reserves to put money in the pockets of Jesse Jackson minions like that guy in Harlem, four years ago, when Clinton was supposedly drawing up war plans against Afghanistan for his replacement to follow...empty strategic reserves and an unprovoked war that would have cut us off from OPEC.

Stop worrying about what the Democrats whine about and do the right thing.

19 posted on 10/15/2004 10:37:44 PM PDT by Jim_Curtis (Liberals lie at the premise, accept their premise and you can only lose the argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

Who'd of thunk it ping FYI...


20 posted on 10/15/2004 10:38:08 PM PDT by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson