Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chemicals Sickened '91 Gulf War Veterans, Latest Study Finds
NY Times ^ | October 15, 2004 | SCOTT SHANE

Posted on 10/15/2004 1:20:04 PM PDT by neverdem

WASHINGTON, Oct. 14 - A federal panel of medical experts studying illnesses among veterans of the 1991 war in the Persian Gulf has broken with several earlier studies and concluded that many suffer from neurological damage caused by exposure to toxic chemicals, rejecting past findings that the ailments resulted mostly from wartime stress.

Citing new scientific research on the effects of exposure to low levels of neurotoxins, the Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans' Illnesses concludes in its draft report that "a substantial proportion of Gulf War veterans are ill with multisymptom conditions not explained by wartime stress or psychiatric illness."

It says a growing body of research suggests that many veterans' symptoms have a neurological cause and that there is a "probable link" to exposure to neurotoxins.

The report says possible sources include sarin, a nerve gas, from an Iraqi weapons depot blown up by American forces in 1991; a drug, pyridostigmine bromide, given to troops to protect against nerve gas; and pesticides used to protect soldiers in the region.

Dr. Joyce C. Lashof , the chairwoman of a presidential advisory group that reported in 1996 that there was no causal link between toxic exposure and the veterans' symptoms, said Thursday that she had not seen the new report. But Dr. Lashof said she was open to changing her views if the findings were based on solid new research and not advocacy by veterans' groups.

"We certainly weren't sure that our report was the definitive answer," Dr. Lashof, professor emerita of public health at the University of California at Berkeley, said. "It was based on the best evidence available at the time."

All the chemicals cited in the new study belong to a group called acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, which can cause a range of symptoms including pain, fatigue, diarrhea and cognitive impairment. Committee members said there might be minor changes in the report, a draft copy of which was obtained by The New York Times, but that the basic scientific findings would not change.

The committee says a search for medical treatments tailored to the new findings are "urgently needed" and recommends $60 million in federal funds for new research over the next four years. It says an estimated 100,000 Gulf War veterans, or about one in seven, suffer war-related health problems.

The report also says that understanding illnesses from the war will be critical in planning future military deployments and measures to improve domestic security. It calls for a reassessment of the use of pyridostigmine bromide.

Though some conclusions are hedged in careful language in the 135-page draft report, committee members said in interviews that they were consciously departing from the past scientific consensus and taking a strong stand on a politically and scientifically volatile subject.

"I would absolutely say it's a break from previous panels," said Dr. Beatrice A. Golomb, an associate professor of medicine at the University of California at San Diego, a member of the panel and its scientific director for much of its existence. "It reflects a different body of evidence, because more studies have come out. No one had gone to the scientific evidence on acetylcholinesterase inhibitors."

The new report, prepared for the federal Department of Veterans Affairs, draws conclusions that are essentially the opposite of those of the Presidential Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans' Illnesses, led by Dr. Lashof. That group reported to President Bill Clinton in 1996 that "current scientific evidence does not support a causal link" between the veterans' symptoms and chemical exposures in the Persian Gulf.

Instead, the earlier group said, stress "is likely to be an important contributing factor to the broad range of physical and psychological illnesses currently being reported by gulf war veterans."

Another panel of scientists convened in 1998 by the Institute of Medicine, a unit of the National Academies that focuses on health and medical advice, has produced a series of reports that generally point away from neurotoxin exposure as a likely cause of the veterans' illnesses.

Some 697,000 American troops were sent to the Persian Gulf at the end of 1990 to drive the Iraqi forces of President Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait. Though the military campaign was swift and successful, 13 years after the war ended many veterans still complain of persistent fatigue, headaches, joint pain, numbness, diarrhea and other health problems.

Among dozens of studies cited by the new report is a 1998 survey that looked at about 2,000 Kansas veterans, 1,548 of whom served in the gulf. It found that more than 30 percent of the gulf veterans report three or more such symptoms. The presence of multiple symptoms, their persistence for many years and the dominance of muscular and skeletal complaints all distinguish the ailments of gulf war veterans from the ailments of veterans of other wars, Dr. Golomb said.

The Pentagon admitted in 1997 that as many as 100,000 American service members might have been exposed to nerve gas when American combat engineers blew up the Kamisiyah ammunition depot in southern Iraq in March 1991, shortly after the war.

The new panel was appointed in 2002 by Anthony J. Principi, the veterans affairs secretary, in accordance with a law passed in 1998 but never acted on by the Clinton administration. Of the 11 members 7 are scientists and 4 are veterans, including the chairman, James Binns, a Vietnam veteran and former Pentagon official. Eight other scientists worked as advisers to the panel.

Committee members said release of the report, which was described in the Oct. 1 issue of Science magazine, had been set for earlier this month but was postponed because of scheduling problems.

Through a spokeswoman, Mr. Principi, who was in Michigan Thursday for the groundbreaking of a new veterans cemetery, praised the committee's work.

"I'm looking forward to studying the committee's report and working with them to ensure adequate research funding to find answers to these perplexing medical issues," he said. He said the department was already providing disability benefits for some veterans who have developed amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or Lou Gehrig's disease, based on studies finding that the veterans have nearly double the risk of the disease as veterans who did not go to the Persian Gulf do.

According to his spokeswoman, Cynthia Church, Mr. Principi, a combat-decorated Navy veteran of the Vietnam War, took a particular interest in the research of Dr. Robert W. Haley, whom he appointed to the panel. Dr. Haley, chief of epidemiology at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, has written a series of studies of the possible effects of neurotoxins on gulf war veterans, including some financed by the Texas billionaire H. Ross Perot.

Dr. Haley acknowledged that his work, which has been championed by some veterans and members of Congress, has been viewed skeptically by some scientists. He said the current committee's findings represent a "revolutionary change" from the past, when what he called "radically conservative" scientists dismissed the neurotoxin thesis.

"I think this committee has honestly weighed all the evidence," he said. "Although it's not proven, the preponderance of the evidence supports a new explanation - brain cell damage, nervous system damage caused by chemical exposures."

Jim Reichert, a 41-year-old industrial equipment mechanic who lives in Columbia, Ill., said he was heartened to hear of the committee's conclusions.

Mr. Reichert said he had served as a Blackhawk helicopter crewman in the war. After his six months in the gulf region, he developed strange symptoms which have never gone away, he said. Fatigue forced him to give up hunting and fishing, he loses control of his hand muscles and drops tools on the job, and he suffers from chronic diarrhea and a recurring, blistering skin condition.

"If it was stress alone, it wouldn't have lasted this long," Mr. Reichert said. Referring to himself and other ailing veterans, he said: "We're not crazy. If I'm a little nuts, it's because I've been sick so long."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Kansas; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 1991; armedforces; army; gulfwar; gulfwarillness; health; medicine; neurotoxins; persiangulfwar; veterans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 10/15/2004 1:20:05 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fourdeuce82d; El Gato; JudyB1938; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; ...

FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.


2 posted on 10/15/2004 1:26:03 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Iraq used chemical weapons against our troops in 1991.

That's why our troops were so suited-up in March 2003.

3 posted on 10/15/2004 1:26:34 PM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN (Anybody but Kerry!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN

That's also why Clinton ordered Anthrax vaccines for all personnel operating in the Gulf during the late 90's.

I recall there were multiple Courts martials and discharges for those who refused to get the shots. Funny how the MSM never mentions that anymore.


4 posted on 10/15/2004 1:30:18 PM PDT by Wristpin (Bloggers, forget your silly whim. It doesn't fit the plan!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wristpin
Funny how the MSM never mentions that anymore.

Au contraire! They will mention it any time they have the chance to make the military look bad or heartless.

Knowing that, it can be a good way to make the MSM look like the ignorant fools they can be, especially regarding the military or science.

5 posted on 10/15/2004 1:39:48 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I never doubted for a minute that our troops were exposed to chemicals in the first Iraq war.


6 posted on 10/15/2004 2:09:15 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; All
Dr. Haley at UT Southwestern in Dallas has long believed that many vets suffered from real problems. Here is a link an intro.

http://www.chronicillnet.org/online/Haley.html

Robert W. Haley, M.D., and colleagues just published three research papers in the Journal of the American Medical Association describing three primary, organic, neurotoxic syndromes among veterans of the Persian Gulf War. These three syndromes appear to be variants of a rare disorder called "organophosphate-induced delayed polyneuropathy," which is caused by exposure to neurotropic chemical agents like insect repellant or chemical warfare agents.

Dr. Haley and his colleagues elucidated the three syndromes using a mathematical analysis to disentangle the generally ambiguous symptoms described by sick members of a Navy Reserve Unit (Reserve Naval Mobile Construction Battalion 24) who had served in the Persian Gulf War. Once the symptoms were clearly delineated, these researchers performed a case-control study of deployed and non-deployed veterans, some of whom were sick (the "cases") and some of whom were healthy (the "controls"), to determine the symptoms' cause(s).

The first syndrome is characterized by difficulty concentrating, depression, fatigue, distractability, and difficulty sleeping. The second syndrome, which is the most severe, consists of problems with thinking and reasoning, confusion, disorientation, dizziness and difficulty with balance. The third syndrome's symptoms are painful joints, tingling and numbness in the hands and feet, and muscle fatigue and pain.

7 posted on 10/15/2004 2:18:52 PM PDT by q_an_a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

This is impossible...Saddam had no WMD. < /sarcasm>


8 posted on 10/15/2004 2:20:43 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack ("We deal in hard calibers and hot lead." - Roland Deschaines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Surprised I didn't see the name of Dr. Garth Nicolson in this article. he is a hero surrounding this story. He was the head of cancer research at University of Texas until he started making some uncomfortable claims. he started research of his own (his daughter contracted the symptoms while serving in Iraq) and started making public statements about there being a real problem. he and his wife (also a PhD in chemistry) were let go. Seriously do a google on his name and find out how he has fought this war. Amazing stuff.


9 posted on 10/15/2004 2:28:14 PM PDT by tang-soo (Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks - Read Daniel Chapter 9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
"The report says possible sources include sarin, a nerve gas, from an Iraqi weapons depot blown up by American forces in 1991; a drug, pyridostigmine bromide, given to troops to protect against nerve gas; and pesticides used to protect soldiers in the region."

Don't you see? It's all the US's and Bush family's fault.

/sarcasm

10 posted on 10/15/2004 2:29:19 PM PDT by kaboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: q_an_a

Thanks for the info & URL.


11 posted on 10/15/2004 2:32:31 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tang-soo

Weren't they tenured?


12 posted on 10/15/2004 2:43:19 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tang-soo

Thanks for pointing us toward Dr. Garth Nicolson. I did a search and his research is very interesting. A good friend of ours came back from the Gulf War with many unexplained symptoms, and reading Dr Nicolson's findings on Mycoplasma sure sounds like this guy could be a victim of an undiagnosed infection.


13 posted on 10/15/2004 2:48:33 PM PDT by Darnright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Please add me to your health ping list.

The new panel was appointed in 2002 by Anthony J. Principi, the veterans affairs secretary, in accordance with a law passed in 1998 but never acted on by the Clinton administration.

It's amazing that the NY Times even acknowledged that!

Those with Gulf War Syndrome have my prayers -- and more than just empathy.
14 posted on 10/15/2004 3:07:50 PM PDT by Fawnn (Canteen wOOhOO Consultant and CookingWithPam.com person - Faith makes things possible, not easy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; All
Gulf War Syndrome- Where there's smoke, *is* there fire?
15 posted on 10/15/2004 3:50:42 PM PDT by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
I never doubted for a minute that our troops were exposed to chemicals in the first Iraq war.

Neither did I, and the manner in which they have been treated since is horrible. Dismissing a patient with symptoms as a psych case is one of the most cruel things medical professionals can do.

16 posted on 10/15/2004 4:59:56 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia; Revel; appalachian_dweller; Velveeta; lacylu; Alabama MOM

Ping


17 posted on 10/15/2004 5:35:43 PM PDT by nw_arizona_granny (On this day your Prayers are needed!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

Thanks for the links


18 posted on 10/15/2004 5:49:54 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nw_arizona_granny

It's shameful how long it's taking to get these people some help.


19 posted on 10/15/2004 6:08:48 PM PDT by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

Gulf War Syndrome is real.

And it is nice to finally have that be confirmed.


20 posted on 10/15/2004 10:41:33 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (BYPASS FORCED WEB REGISTRATION! **** http://www.bugmenot.com ****)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson