Posted on 10/11/2004 12:27:07 PM PDT by Fedora
I agree--he is dangerous indeed, and a risk we can't afford at this point in our nation's history. We were lucky we survived Clinton. After 9/11 if we make the same mistake in allowing someone like that to be elected, I shudder to think what will happen.
Yes; and what also gets me is how the Democrats and media surely know his true nature and yet they support him anyway.
bump
I'm all ready for Hillary 2008. They are two birds of a feather. The more I can add, the better.
"media surely know his true nature and yet they support him anyway."
MSM to me equels WMD Incorperated.
One thing I noted about Hillary I wanted to make sure I mentioned to you is the VVAW/Bob Kunst connection--see Note 242 for the link to Kunst's pro-Hillary site.
"MSM to me equels WMD Incorperated."
LOL! That should be the name of an ABC affiliate! :)
Kerry's got more Commie connections than Pete Seeger! (Thanks for the ping!)
Congratulations. And thanks.
LOL! Kerry's band probably used to tour with Pete Seeger :)
You know what is so damned disgusting, no one seems to care!For crying out loud, where is Senator McCarthy?
Thank you!
Yeah, Kerry's somehow managed to insulate himself against this whole area of discussion. Even Clinton's antiwar activity got more press coverage during the 1992 campaign.
Ping.
Bookmarked and bumped.
Bookmarked and bumped.
OOPS Didn't mean to post this twice!
Thank you.
JFKerry's politics seems to be one and the same as his religion. The boldness with which he has used Vietnam as foundation giving him qualification to be president is a perversion of the highest order.
The man is not mentally stable, he actually is beginning to remind me of that mental "Il" of N. Korea demanding respect.
You have done admirable work here and I am most apprecative of your tireless effort, including all others that helped put together the trails and paths that connect to JFKerry.
JFKerry has become the warlord of Vietnam, slipped through with his good friend, fellow senator McCain, normalization of that nation which neither ever promote. We rarely ever hear the status of Vietnam these days. One does have to be curious why.
I've gotten that impression during the debates. He wants to play the moderate, but his need to attack authority as represented by the President gets the better of him, leading him to shrillness despite himself. He doesn't think twice about not only lying but in the process disowning his own core beliefs and values--it's obvious he's liberal but he has no problem saying he's not if it will get him elected, in contrast to a liberal who is honest enough to admit what they are. His flip-flops are symptomatic of someone who is out of touch with any reality except that which revolves around himself and his desire for attention and power.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.