Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mental Health Screening for Kids- Part II
http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2004/tst092004.htm ^

Posted on 09/20/2004 2:16:10 PM PDT by Orange1998

September 20, 2004

Last week I wrote about a presidential initiative called the “New Freedom Commission on Mental Health,” which issued a report calling for the mandatory mental health screening of American schoolchildren. This new proposal threatens to force millions of kids to undergo psychiatric screening, whether their parents consent or not. At issue is the fundamental right of parents to decide what medical treatment is appropriate for their children.

I introduced an amendment to eliminate any funding for the proposal in a Department of Education and Department of Health and Human Services spending bill. Although the amendment failed, the response to my office has been overwhelming and highly supportive. The notion of federal bureaucrats ordering potentially millions of youngsters to take psychotropic drugs like Ritalin strikes an emotional chord with American parents, who are sick of relinquishing more and more parental control to government.

Some members of Congress objected to my amendment on the grounds that the federal screening program does not yet exist, so it’s premature to oppose it. But the whole point was to prevent the proposal from being implemented in the first place. Once created, federal programs are nearly impossible to eliminate. Congress had a rare opportunity to stop a bad idea in its tracks, before it becomes entrenched. Every member who opposes the idea of forcing kids to undergo mental health screening should have sent a strong statement by voting for my amendment. They will have another chance to kill the initiative when I introduce a stand-alone bill later this year.

Furthermore, it’s not true that no money has been allocated for the proposal. The Appropriations committee, which distributes your tax dollars to the various federal agencies, specifically allotted $20 million in the HHS/Education bill for state programs in support of the New Freedom commission report. These federally-funded state programs will be the precursors of the broader federal program recommended by the commission.

Anyone who understands bureaucracies knows they assume more and more power incrementally. A few scattered state programs over time will be replaced by a federal program implemented in a few select cities. Once the limited federal program is accepted, it will be expanded nationwide. Once in place throughout the country, the screening program will become mandatory. This is why we can never trust new bureaucratic programs: no matter how benevolent their proponents claim them to be, most programs morph into something much larger than originally foreseen. Those who view my concerns as alarmism fail to understand the inevitable nature of bureaucratic growth.

Soviet communists attempted to paint all opposition to the state as mental illness. It now seems our own federal government wants to create a therapeutic nanny state, beginning with schoolchildren. It’s not hard to imagine a time 20 or 30 years from now when government psychiatrists stigmatize children whose religious, social, or political values do not comport with those of the politically correct, secular state.

American parents must do everything they can to remain responsible for their children’s well-being. If we allow government to become intimately involved with our children’s minds and bodies, we will have lost the final vestiges of parental authority. Strong families are the last line of defense against an overreaching bureaucratic state.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: mentalhealth; newfreedom; newfreedominitiative; privacy; schoolmentalhealth
I wish we had more Ron Paul's in government.
1 posted on 09/20/2004 2:16:11 PM PDT by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Orange1998
Government requires all sorts of mandatory health screenings and tests before a child can attend public school. What's the difference with mental health screening?
2 posted on 09/20/2004 5:22:55 PM PDT by Fishing-guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Orange1998; glock rocks; Pete-R-Bilt; TexasCowboy; Eaker; Squantos; Happy2BMe; farmfriend

We need someplace on FR where 'important' parental threads can be placed. Just so we can keep track of where Washington is taking us.

The other thing that surprises me is how few responses this thread has received. Where did all the parents and grandparents go today?


3 posted on 09/20/2004 5:58:46 PM PDT by B4Ranch (´´Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the people´s liberty´s teeth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fishing-guy

I don't believe the government has the right for mandatory screening. If a child is not a threat to others then why require testing. It's just more government controls.


4 posted on 09/20/2004 5:59:01 PM PDT by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

They will wake up when the government comes knocking on their doors.


5 posted on 09/20/2004 6:00:42 PM PDT by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Orange1998

This is one of the most stupid proposals I have ever heard. There is NO substitute for good parenting. Perhaps it is potential parents that need screened.


7 posted on 09/20/2004 6:10:31 PM PDT by freeangel (freeangel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch; Orange1998
Ron Paul. Nail. Head.

Make sure your child takes his speed, or we'll have to remove him from your home, and charge you with child endangerment. It's for the welfare of the child.

It's always for the children.

8 posted on 09/20/2004 6:11:47 PM PDT by glock rocks ("Bush is playing chess, and Kerry is playing checkers." - Dick Morris)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks; B4Ranch; mhking
We are sinking.

Sinking.

This crap is Kerry's cup of tea too.

Just damn.

9 posted on 09/20/2004 6:16:22 PM PDT by Eaker ("He's the kind of guy who would fight a rattlesnake and give the snake a two-bite head start.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Fishing-guy
Government requires all sorts of mandatory health screenings and tests before a child can attend public school. What's the difference with mental health screening?

Because the psychiatric/psychologic industry has become hugely politicized of late, in case you haven't noticed. They want to 'normalize' pedophilia, homosexuality, people wanting sex changes, etcetera. Consider what has been done to boys across this nation who act like boys....they recommend doping for ADD, ODD, ADHD, and a host of other 'kid' behaviors that have all of a sudden become 'disorders' needing 'treatment'.

I predict that the pharmaceutical industry is behind this. After everyone gets diagnosed with something, Compassionate Conservatism will be right there to pay for the meds.

10 posted on 09/20/2004 6:32:26 PM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch; bd476
Where did all the parents and grandparents go today?

You just have to know who to ping.

11 posted on 09/20/2004 6:32:55 PM PDT by farmfriend ( In Essentials, Unity...In Non-Essentials, Liberty...In All Things, Charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Eaker
>>We are sinking.<<

House passes bill for mental Health Screening for children

A lot faster than we want to admit it.

12 posted on 09/20/2004 7:25:20 PM PDT by B4Ranch (´´Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the people´s liberty´s teeth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta

I have yet to read any proposal for mandatory medicating of children.

If the mental health screening looks for learning disorder, mental retardation, autistic disorder, suicidality, and antisocial problems, and it has a system set up for early intervention for these children, Then it sounds like a good system.


13 posted on 09/20/2004 9:48:49 PM PDT by Fishing-guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Orange1998
Shouldn't we contact President Bush who started this Nonsense?  Our mental health system is fine and it should be left up to the states as to what to do with their citizens.

alt President Says U.S. Must Make Commitment to Mental Health Care en Español
     watch View the President's Remarks
     listenListen to the President's Remarks

Mailing Address

The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
Phone Numbers

Comments:   202-456-1111
Switchboard: 202-456-1414
FAX:             202-456-2461
TTY/TDD

Comments:      202-456-6213
Visitors Office: 202-456-2121
E-Mail

President George W. Bush: president@whitehouse.gov
Vice President Richard Cheney: vice.president@whitehouse.gov

Psychiatry and the State (Excerpt)
by Dennis Behreandt

The federal government plans a new role in delivering mental health care.  Historically, however, governments have used psychiatric techniques for harm rather than good.

On April 29, 2002, President George W. Bush issued an executive order creating a new commission charged with finding ways to “improve America’s mental health service delivery system.” One year later, the Orwellian-sounding New Freedom Commission on Mental Health released its findings.  Its final report recommended mental health screening for all Americans and, in a proposal that should alarm parents everywhere, recommended that the nation’s schools be used to assess the mental health of all schoolchildren.

President George W. Bush wants to have  American citizens, beginning with all school age children, examined by psychiatrists.

"The New Freedom Initiative is a plan to screen the entire U.S. population for mental illness and to provide a cradle-to-grave continuum of services for those identified as either mentally ill or at risk of becoming so. Under the plan, schools would become hubs of the screening process, not only for children, but for their parents and teachers. There are even components aimed at senior citizens, pregnant women, and new mothers.

"In April 2002, President Bush established the New Freedom Commission on Mental Health to conduct a 'comprehensive study of the United States mental health service delivery system.' The commission issued its recommendations in July 2003, chief among them being that schools are in a 'key position' to screen the 52 million students and 6 million adults who work at educational facilities."

This Draconian federal program began in Texas while G.W. Bush was Governor. It was called the Texas Medication Algorithm Project as an alliance between the pharmaceutical industry, the University of Texas, and the mental health and corrections systems of Texas. Now that Bush is President, he has begun implementing the program at the national level.


14 posted on 11/11/2004 5:53:54 PM PST by Coleus (Abortion and Euthanasia, Don't Democrats just kill ya!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson