Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Atomic Activity in North Korea Raises Concerns
NYT ^ | 09-12-2004 | D SANGER, W BROAD

Posted on 09/11/2004 6:18:08 PM PDT by Indie

WASHINGTON, Sept. 11 - President Bush and his top advisers have received intelligence reports in recent days describing a confusing series of actions by North Korea that some experts believe could indicate the country is preparing to conduct its first test explosion of a nuclear weapon, according to senior officials with access to the intelligence.

While the indications were viewed as serious enough to warrant a warning to the White House, American intelligence agencies appear divided about the significance of the new North Korean actions, much as they were about the evidence concerning Iraq's alleged weapons stockpiles.

Some analysts in agencies that were the most cautious about the Iraq findings have cautioned that they do not believe the activity detected in North Korea in the past three weeks is necessarily the harbinger of a test. A senior scientist who assesses nuclear intelligence says the new evidence "is not conclusive," but is potentially worrisome.

If successful, a test would end a debate that stretches back more than a decade over whether North Korea has a rudimentary arsenal, as it has boasted in recent years. Some analysts also fear that a test could change the balance of power in Asia, perhaps leading to a new nuclear arms race there.

In interviews on Friday and Saturday, senior officials were reluctant to provide many details of the new activities they have detected, but some of the information appears to have come from satellite intelligence.

One official with access to the intelligence called it "a series of indicators of increased activity that we believe would be associated with a test," saying that the "likelihood" of a North Korean test had risen significantly in just the past four weeks.

It was that changed assessment that led to the decision to give an update to President Bush, the officials said.

The activities included the movement of materials around several suspected test sites, including one near a location where intelligence agencies reported last year that conventional explosives were being tested that could compress a plutonium core and set off a nuclear explosion. But officials have not seen the classic indicators of preparations at a test site, in which cables are laid to measure an explosion in a deep test pit.

"I'm not sure you would see that in a country that has tunnels everywhere," said one senior official who has reviewed the data. Officials said if North Korea proceeded with a test, it would probably be with a plutonium bomb, perhaps one fabricated from the 8,000 spent nuclear fuel rods that the North has boasted in the past few months have been reprocessed into bomb fuel.

A senior intelligence official noted Saturday that even if "they are doing something, it doesn't mean they will" conduct a test, noting that preparations that the North knew could be detected by the United States might be a scare tactic or negotiating tactic by the North Korean government.

Several officials speculated that the test, if it occurred, could be intended to influence the presidential election, though a senior military official said while "an election surprise" could be the motive, "I'm not sure what that would buy them."

While the intelligence community's experience in Iraq colors how it assesses threats in places like North Korea, the comparisons are inexact. Inspectors have seen and measured the raw material that the North could turn into bomb fuel; the only question is whether they have done so in the 20 months since arms inspectors were ousted. While Iraq denied it has weapons, the North boasts about them - perhaps too loudly, suggesting they may have less than they say.

On the other hand, the divisions within the administration over how to deal with North Korea mirrors some of the old debate about Iraq. Hard-liners in the Pentagon and the vice president's office have largely opposed making concessions of any kind in negotiations, and Vice President Dick Cheney has warned that "time is not on our side" to deal with the question. The State Department has pressed the case for negotiation, and for offering the North a face-saving way out. While the State Department has won the argument in recent times, how to deal with the North is a constant battle inside the administration.

Some of the senior officials who discussed the emerging indicators were clearly trying to warn North Korea's leader, Kim Jong Il, that his actions were being closely watched. Asian officials noted that there has been speculation in South Korea and Japan for some time that Mr. Kim might try to stage an incident - perhaps a missile test or the withdrawal of more raw nuclear fuel from a reactor - in an effort to display defiance before the election. "A test would be a vivid demonstration of their view of President Bush," one senior Asian diplomat said.

The intelligence information was discussed in interviews with officials from five government agencies, ranging from those who believe a test may occur at any moment to those who are highly skeptical. They had differing access to the intelligence: some had reviewed the raw data and others had seen a classified intelligence report about the possibility of a test, perhaps within months, that has circulated in Washington in the past week. Most, but not all, were career officials.

If North Korea successfully tested a weapon, the reclusive country would become the eighth nation to have proven nuclear capability - Israel is also assumed to have working weapons - and it would represent the failure of 14 years of efforts to stop the North's nuclear program.

Government officials throughout Asia and members of Mr. Bush's national security team have also feared it could change the nuclear politics of Asia, fueling political pressure in South Korea and Japan to develop a nuclear deterrent independent of the United States.

Both countries have the technological skill and the raw material to produce a bomb, though both have insisted they would never do so. South Korea has admitted in the past few weeks that it conducted experiments that outside experts fear could produce bomb-grade fuel, first in the early 1980's and then in 2000.

Senior officials in South Korea and Japan did not appear to have been briefed about the new evidence, beyond what one called "a nonspecific warning of a growing problem" from American officials. But it is a measure of the extraordinary nervousness about the North's intentions that earlier this week, South Korean intelligence officials who saw evidence of an intense fire at a suspected nuclear location alerted their American counterparts that a small nuclear test might have already occurred. American officials reviewed seismic sensors and other data and concluded it was a false alarm, though the fire has yet to be explained.

North Korea has declared several times in the past year that it might move to demonstrate its nuclear power. It is impossible to know how such a test might affect public perceptions of how Mr. Bush has handled potential threats to the United States. Senator John Kerry, the Democratic presidential nominee, has already accused President Bush of an "almost myopic" focus on Iraq that has distracted the United States while North Korea, by some intelligence estimates, has increased its arsenal from what the C.I.A. suspects was one or two weapons to six or eight now.

Mr. Bush, while declaring he would not "tolerate" a nuclear North Korea, has insisted that his approach of involving China, Russia, Japan and South Korea in a new round of talks with the North is the only reasonable way to force the country to disarm. He has refused to set the kind of deadline for disarmament that he set for Saddam Hussein.

When asked in an interview with The New York Times two weeks ago to define what he meant by "tolerate," he said: "I don't think you give timelines to dictators and tyrants. I think it's important for us to continue to lead coalitions that are firm and strong, in sending messages to both the North Koreans and the Iranians."

The differing assessments of North Korea's intentions may reflect the competing lessons of two huge intelligence failures: the failure of the C.I.A. and other intelligence agencies to detect India's preparations for a nuclear test in 1998, and the false warnings about the state of Iraq's nuclear, biological and chemical programs in 2002, which became the chief justification for invading the country. An investigation into the first failure, a test that took intelligence officials by surprise and led to Pakistan's first tests, prompted searing criticisms of the nation's intelligence agencies. It also created an atmosphere, intelligence professionals say, that encouraged early warning of any hint that another country is preparing a nuclear test.

Eric Schmitt contributed reporting for this article.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: napalminthemorning; northkorea; nuclear; proliferation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

1 posted on 09/11/2004 6:18:08 PM PDT by Indie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Indie

Would the kimchee hit the fan if the NK's lit one off?


2 posted on 09/11/2004 6:19:40 PM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indie

If they test a bomb, the world goes in. If we go in first before such a test is made, we will be doing it all alone.

Tough choice, plus they can kill people in the south by testing close to the south's northern border.


3 posted on 09/11/2004 6:21:31 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indie

If they test, launch a first strike.


4 posted on 09/11/2004 6:21:35 PM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Tough choice, plus they can kill people in the south by testing close to the south's northern border.

Underground tests (as it's sure to be) wouldn't kill anyone a mile away, much less across the border.

5 posted on 09/11/2004 6:24:04 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Indie

My guess is that this is the October Surprise.


6 posted on 09/11/2004 6:24:29 PM PDT by July 4th (You need to click "Abstimmen")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

IIRC there was something about the South Koreans moving the Capitol further south.

Or was I just dreaming???


7 posted on 09/11/2004 6:26:35 PM PDT by ChefKeith (Life is GREAT with CoCo..........NASCAR...everything else is just a game!(Except War & Love))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
If they test a bomb, the world goes in

Actually, I would anticipate that China would beat everyone else to the punch.

China is not pro-democracy, but they sure don't like the idea of a nuclear madman on their border

8 posted on 09/11/2004 6:26:53 PM PDT by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
If they so much as toot...
PS- no, I cannot explain the TWO streams of flame.
9 posted on 09/11/2004 6:27:08 PM PDT by Righter-than-Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Indie

wondering if saddam gave the syrians his enriched uranium, syrians sold or trade it to the north Koreans, isreal blew up their scientists, but now they ready to cap one off.


10 posted on 09/11/2004 6:27:16 PM PDT by Walkingfeather (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: July 4th

"My guess is that this is the October Surprise."

For us or the Dems?

Anything that involves the military is a Bush positive.


11 posted on 09/11/2004 6:27:41 PM PDT by Rebelbase (Partisan Political Operative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

If they test a bomb...

Nothing particular will happen.


12 posted on 09/11/2004 6:28:15 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Indie
The US and ROK have said many times that a North Korea with nuclear weapons will not be tolerated.

That sounds like a line in the rocks.

13 posted on 09/11/2004 6:30:05 PM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Righter-than-Rush

Dual exhaust!


14 posted on 09/11/2004 6:30:13 PM PDT by Rebelbase (Partisan Political Operative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Indie

"Mr. Bush, while declaring he would not "tolerate" a nuclear North Korea"

Two problems with this sentence;

1. Mr. Bush's name here is President Bush.
2. "tolerate" should not be in "quotes".

How about this:

"President Bush, while declaring he would not tolerate a nuclear Iraq, didn't!"


15 posted on 09/11/2004 6:31:05 PM PDT by Michael Goldsberry (Which part of "Don't Mess With Texas" didn't you get?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChefKeith

There has been talk of moving the capitol


16 posted on 09/11/2004 6:32:04 PM PDT by nuconvert (Everyone has a photographic memory. Some don't have film.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Pong


17 posted on 09/11/2004 6:32:45 PM PDT by nuconvert (Everyone has a photographic memory. Some don't have film.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Indie

How does the Bush doctrine apply here? There is a provable connection between NK and the nuclear blackmarket; Nuclear materials that are already known to have transited to Pakistan. There's a very thin membrane between PK and the various Islamist terrorist groups.

So why doesn't Bush go in? Is it possible the USGOV has intel NK already has functional nukes, and would use them against Seoul or Japan if the US interceded? Or even missile capability that would reach the US west coast, who knows?

Is it maybe a political calculation that the US is too war-weary for a third major military operation, especially in an election year?

I have a feeling there's alot of info that's not being shared with the public here.


18 posted on 09/11/2004 6:33:15 PM PDT by mikenola
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leapfrog

*sigh*

Modern J school grads, who spent more time learning to hate Republicans than studying the use of the language.


19 posted on 09/11/2004 6:34:17 PM PDT by Riley (Need an experienced computer tech in the DC Metro area? I'm looking. Freepmail for details.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mikenola

war with North Korea will be very difficult. The Chinese helped out last time. What their official stance is, I haven't heard, but they don't seem too vocal against it.

IOW, China always has more to say about Taiwan than North Korea.


20 posted on 09/11/2004 6:36:04 PM PDT by Bobby777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson