Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More Evidence of Dan Rather's/CBS' Complicity in Fraud Regarding President Bush
Retired Navy | 9/10/04 | self

Posted on 09/10/2004 8:36:08 AM PDT by pabianice

As I've posted previously, and to which multiple Freepers have added, the Bush "Memos" recently created by CBS and Dan Rather to discredit the president are a mess of fraud that could have been created only by someone with zero familiarity of the military.

Below are real military documents from the same era (1971-1973). These real documents instantly show the fraud in the badly-written forgeries that CBS used to "prove" George Bush failed to meet his Guard obligations. Military orders were, and are, extremely formal, with typeset letterhead; boxed format; numbered items for completion; a formal, must-be-used reference block; multiple check boxes; and often a requirement that the receiving officer sign the document in ackowledgment (especially when being threatened with grounding). Notice the absense of justified type, superscripts (abbreviations are in regular font), the strict use of DDMMYY and caps, careful CC" list for other offices, and "by direction" -- a senior officer never typed his own orders to a subordinate, let alone misspelled his own rank abbreviation.

Now campare these to the junk created by James Carville. Pathetic. And yet Dan Rather used Carville's junk to try and smear the president.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: killian
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last


1 posted on 09/10/2004 8:36:08 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Watergate put people in prison and cost Richard Nixon his presidency. Memogate is bigger than Watergate. This should finish off the Kerry campaign and send some CBS News staffers to the big house.


2 posted on 09/10/2004 8:45:20 AM PDT by no dems (The BC/'04 Campaign needs to monitor this website.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: pabianice

AND DONT LET seeBS OFF THE HOOK BY SAYING THAT THEY TALKED TO SOMEONE WHO TOLD THEM HE KNEW THE PERSON BLAH BLAH...

DAN RATHER STATED THAT THEY HAD THE DOCUMENTS VERIFIED BY DOCUMENT *EXPERTS*


4 posted on 09/10/2004 8:50:02 AM PDT by Mr. K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
This is HUGH, SERIESLY. I spit on Rather's grave for this and many other lies and one sided reports. All year they've been doing everything they could to damage Bush.

As they reved up the printing presses on Viacom's Bush bashing books they "forgot" to acknowledge their conflicts of interest when promoting these trashy books on 60 Minutes.

5 posted on 09/10/2004 8:51:00 AM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Part of the Reagan legacy is to re-elect G.W. Bush))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

If the Mslim terrorists were to take over a US broadcast station how would they have done anything different than Dan Rather?


6 posted on 09/10/2004 8:51:25 AM PDT by Wardawg (Hanoi John was here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: H0wlin

DU SHILL - Signed up just today!


7 posted on 09/10/2004 8:52:09 AM PDT by VRWCTexan (History has a long memory - but still repeats itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Thanks for dragging them out.

USN for 26 years. Never had a memo directive for anything important. The whole thing is bogus.

But it does show an important fact, that the MSM and dems are totally military ignorant.


8 posted on 09/10/2004 8:52:44 AM PDT by KeyWest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: H0wlin

TROLL ALERT!!!


9 posted on 09/10/2004 8:53:52 AM PDT by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: H0wlin
Nice try, jackass.

Go back to DU and tell your buddies you are a crappy forger also...."h '0' wlin"

10 posted on 09/10/2004 8:53:53 AM PDT by bigjoesaddle (Shrug)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wardawg

You wanted to know how Muslim terrorists would have acted differently if they took over CBS.

For starters, they would have used a more convincing fake.


11 posted on 09/10/2004 8:53:58 AM PDT by sittnick (There's no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: H0wlin
GOODBY TROLL!!!!!!!!

Go back to the DU where you belong

12 posted on 09/10/2004 8:54:09 AM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Part of the Reagan legacy is to re-elect G.W. Bush))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Jim Robinson

Check out Post #3.

A Newbie just registered under the name HOwlin, trying to confuse things and make the real Howlin look bad.

I trust this will be dealt with.


13 posted on 09/10/2004 8:55:00 AM PDT by dmzTahoe (John Kerry changes positions more often than a Nevada prostitute!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Kerry did it. He never batted an eye to slander any vets service for political ambition.


14 posted on 09/10/2004 8:57:27 AM PDT by DaveMSmith (CEO, VRWC: When you think treason, don't think Benedict Arnold - think JOHN FORGE KERRY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dmzTahoe; Admin Moderator

Watch out for a How1in too. That is a close lookalike.


15 posted on 09/10/2004 8:57:44 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dmzTahoe
I trust this will be dealt with.

I think that trick lasted about 60 Seconds, these people are pathetic, LOL.

16 posted on 09/10/2004 8:58:06 AM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Part of the Reagan legacy is to re-elect G.W. Bush))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Good work!

I wonder how long Dan Rather will stonewall.
His Bush-hatred far exceeds his common sense.

17 posted on 09/10/2004 9:03:09 AM PDT by NewMediaFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: H0wlin

This isn't about 30 years ago. This is about someone THIS MONTH forging military documents to smear a sitting president weeks before an election. This is about THIS WEEK, the best-known TV news outlet (60 Minutes) featured a top-three news anchor (Dan Rather) claiming he had new evidence to wreck the current president. This is about who TODAY must explain the origin of those documents - and whoever actually created these forgeries, it's clearly a very short chain to either Dan Rather or John Kerry, or both. The content is irrelevant now; the method and motivation are everything.

The Watergate burglary was thought just a small-time job until Nixon inexplicably said "no comment". That the oldest, most respected news show on TV tried to bring down President Bush with laughably forged documents is no less.

Rather doesn't want to be burned, so he'll blame his source. His source doesn't want to be burned, so he'll blame...who? Rather or Kerry? major fallout either way.


18 posted on 09/10/2004 9:03:15 AM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
The saga continues ping!

Check out post 13 also.

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

20 posted on 09/10/2004 9:12:00 AM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Comrade Hillary - 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson