Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I'm sure it will win...
1 posted on 09/07/2004 12:08:31 AM PDT by Ronzo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Ronzo

probably because he knows if he submits it for best documentary, there will be tons of people able to show falsehoods all throughout the movie.


2 posted on 09/07/2004 12:10:14 AM PDT by flashbunny (Hey - click on my name to see an anti-kerry bumper sticker! Do it! Now!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ronzo

Old news: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1208788/posts


3 posted on 09/07/2004 12:14:34 AM PDT by Keith in Iowa (Time's fun when you're having flies. -- Kermit the Frog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ronzo

Critically acclaimed? LOL, oh really? By whom?

It's a farce and everyone knows it's a farce.


4 posted on 09/07/2004 12:14:45 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ronzo

Do they have a nomination category for the best fabrication?


5 posted on 09/07/2004 12:15:58 AM PDT by eclectic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ronzo

You know what, I hope it does win. It will once and for all frame the Oscars for what they are, worthless.


6 posted on 09/07/2004 12:16:56 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ronzo
Moore's film has been disqualified by the Academy's own rules. Since it was aired on television in Cuba by his buddy Castro, Michael Moore's film cannot be nominated or selected as a winner in any Academy Award category.

And if the Academy tries to bend the rules for Moore, I think we should let them know what we think...and in spades.

7 posted on 09/07/2004 12:19:37 AM PDT by Prime Choice (Democrats. They want to have their cake and eat yours too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ronzo

No, he won't win, because there are too many real directors who have skills and work hard. They won't throw another's just desserts away for that man. Even they would not do that for such a talentless windbag.


10 posted on 09/07/2004 12:23:32 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ronzo

I thought that I heard that he had already considered taking the film out of the running if he can find a network to air it on the eve of the election.


15 posted on 09/07/2004 12:31:59 AM PDT by weegee (YOU could have been aborted, and you wouldn't have had a CHOICE about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ronzo

I hope it wins. Saving Private Ryan losing to Shakespeare in Love was when I stopped watching that stupid parade of leftwingers. This will be icing on the cake and show the country what a joke hollywood is.


17 posted on 09/07/2004 12:34:35 AM PDT by Casloy (qs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ronzo

I doubt the suits of the accademy will allow advertisers to flee a program praising moore.

Think about the mere fallout from such a move. ALL other nominees would instantly "disappear" and it would become the michael moore show. (which is what moore is intentially doing)


24 posted on 09/07/2004 1:01:04 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ronzo

This is funny. Moore thinks he's leading a Hollywood pack but the big Oscars are big money acquisitions. No one is going to let a fat little "documentary" filmmaker into their big money game.


26 posted on 09/07/2004 1:27:49 AM PDT by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ronzo
Well, it is a work of total fiction, so why not submit it for best (sic) picture. This is a strange world where such an untalented man could even be considered for an Oscar. I suppose that this is his demand for payback from the neo-commies who support Kerry. I'd like to find out which democrat "527" helped provide funding for this crap in a film can.
27 posted on 09/07/2004 1:37:05 AM PDT by Che Chihuahua (The only good liberal is a dead communist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ronzo

Michael Moore says he won't submit "Fahrenheit 9/11" for consideration as best documentary. Why? Is Garfield up for best documentary also?


29 posted on 09/07/2004 2:01:29 AM PDT by elder5 (freedom is not America's gift to the world, it is the Almighty God's gift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ronzo

If he's going after the Best Film Oscar, then he's admitting that it isn't truthful.


30 posted on 09/07/2004 2:55:08 AM PDT by mass55th ( “Where they have burned books, they will end in burning human beings.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ronzo

This also gives the acadamy the weak excuse it needs to NOT pick "The Passion" (assuming it's been entered).


31 posted on 09/07/2004 5:23:39 AM PDT by WestTexasWend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ronzo

OTHER BEST PICTURE NOMINEES THROUGH HISTORY

"The Broadway Melody of 1936"
"Wilson"
"The Greatest Show on Earth"
"Cleopatra"
"Hello, Dolly!"
"Airport"
"Love Story"
"Cabaret"
"The Towering Inferno"
"Norma Rae"
"Reds"
"Born on the Fourth of July"
"Ghost"
"JFK"
"The Full Monty"
"American Beauty"

33 posted on 09/07/2004 5:38:00 AM PDT by Flux Capacitor (ZELL MILLER IN '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson