Couldn't the very same label be pasted onto Jesse Jackson and his RAT friends?
It could be, but it would be a gross understatement.
Uh, uh, uh. Not so fast Derrick. Keyes entered the race because of Obama's support for legalized infanticide.
You could even go so far as to call his support for infanticide "controversial" or "extreme," but for some reason I doubt you will.
________________________________________________________
These anti-Keyes articles are poppling up all over the country. Keyes has the Dems running scared.
"win-at-all-costs, confrontational brand of politics that again is rearing its ugly head - not that it ever was put to bed - illustrates the deep division that still separates the major parties."
Are we discussing Keyes or Kerry?
Idiot writer! If they're "unregistered," they're not "voters," I hope, and if they're "voters," they can't be "disenfranchised," because that MEANS "not able to vote!"
Go AWAY, you illiterate leftist!
Of course it could! But let's not hold our breaths waiting for the DHIMMICRATS to admit for one moment that they are the worst racists this nation has ever seen. They will, of course, defend their worldview of civil rights/civil liberties as the most authentic because it is so "progressive." What galls me is that liberals are not pleased, indeed, go on the defensive, when they are called "liberals." My reasoned opinion is that they are the ones who have abandoned the authentic civil rights movement for something darker (no pun or racialist satire intended) and more sinister.
Like McCain maybe?
Does this mean for a republican to be black equals race baiting and that "real" blacks will now be so confused they won't know what to think?!?
This report is utterly shameful.
Columnist for N'Digo, a Chicago "magapaper for the urbane"
What the ...? Clear as mud allright!
The so called minorities devotion to the Demoncrats is unbelievable but there are cracks in the making. Questions about the "Victimhood" mentality that this article wants to perpetuate are becoming more prevalent as with the Bill Cosby incident. A loud articulate voice,like Ambassador Keyes', will advance this debate and will be a step toward sanity and freedom.
Whew talk about leaving out facts.
Nothing about Keyes positions on the issues, pro-life, pro-tax cuts, pro-protection of marriage, pro-school choice, etc.etc. but this guy leaves out that this yahoo hart got in because he was unnopposed on a ballot in a district where the Pubbies have written off due to a strong and IIRC, conservative for a demo, district.
Manipulative journalism at its worst.
So,
the author is admitting the race-problem in Democrat-controlled Chicago was severe before Keyes entered the picture.
Keyes' presence might help end the stalemate between the races.
Maybe Baker would consider his own views vetted in public. Put them up against Keyes as a pro-life, small government conservative. See who the voters pick. Obama is probably much like Baker. So, maybe we will see.
Obama can count on a very late entry, and a leftwing 'mainstream' out to get Keyes - KEYES IS THE REALLLL CRIMINAL! He'll be mocked on local shows, and national shows. The whole national lib establishment will be out to get him. No paranoia. Sometimes they really are gunning for you - figuratively. Keyes might still win, in the face of constant ridicule and misrepresentation. It's possible.
How easy it must be to be a lib - and how disappointing.
"that archconservative Alan Keyes "
OOOOOOHHHHH!!! "ARCHconservative" !!
Is that worse than "far right wing extremist", or "vast right wing conspiracy"????
These leftist papers make me want to puke.
If Keyes is an "archconservative", so was George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Bejamin Franklin.
These people should get their butts out their rectums - maybe they could then see and hear more clearly.
And this columnist's proof is ...?
Sounds to me this article is a desperate attempt to influence the process.