Double-barrelled Mega-PING! to both lists! If you want on, FReepmail me!
Posted on 08/06/2004 6:47:56 AM PDT by mhking
There they go again. Devoid of ideas, running from the record of failure on the economy and national security, President Bush and his campaign are going negative again, trying to label John Kerry rather than level with Americans.
Now the refrain is that Kerry and Edwards are too ''liberal'' for America. Democrats tend to duck when such charges are leveled. Clinton dressed up as a ''New Democrat,'' trying to separate himself rhetorically. Reformers now call themselves ''progressives,'' trying to avoid the label. Frankly, I think it's time for people to stand up.
Think about it: A conservative Christian is a contradiction in terms. Christ wasn't a conservative. He fed the hungry simply because they were hungry. He didn't require that they go to work first. He healed the sick, simply because they were sick. He didn't push them into an insurance company, or let the drug companies gouge them on prices. Jesus was a liberal; Herod was the conservative.
Moses was the liberal; Pharaoh was the conservative. Abolitionists were liberals; slave owners were the conservatives. Mandela is a liberal; the South African apartheid leaders were the conservatives. That's why conservative Dick Cheney supported apartheid over Mandela, and approved of keeping Mandela in prison.
The Suffragettes were liberals; those who opposed the vote for women were conservatives. Martin Luther King was a liberal; the segregationists were conservatives. He wanted to end racial discrimination; they wanted to conserve it.
Advocates of national health care are liberals; George W. Bush, the HMOs and drug companies are the conservatives. They profit from the current system and want to conserve it from reforms that would make health care affordable for all Americans.
America was a liberal idea. Washington and Jefferson were the liberals; King George was the conservative. America was founded on the proposition that ''We the people'' were endowed with inalienable rights -- including life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. And when oppressed by an unjust ruler, we had the right to declare our independence and establish our own form of government.
And America was built by liberals -- by dissenters, by those persecuted for their religion or their race. The Statute of Liberty doesn't say, ''Send me your privileged, your wealthy, your powerful yearning to conserve their fortunes.'' It says, ''Send me your tired, your poor, your humble yearning to breathe free.''
Today the choices are equally clear. Bush and Cheney argue for tax cuts for the wealthy; they want to consolidate the wealth and power of the ''have mores'' that the president calls ''my base.''
Liberals are for rolling back tax cuts for the rich and investing in education so every child gets a fair shot. Conservatives would conserve the two Americas: one system of education, health care and retirement security for the powerful, and one for the rest of us. Liberals would make certain that everyone has the right to a high-quality education, to affordable health care, to a decent retirement.
Bush wants to cut guaranteed benefits under Social Security while privatizing it; liberals want to save Social Security so that all Americans have a basic floor beneath their feet.
Bush is against a minimum wage; liberals want to raise the minimum wage. Bush wants to weaken the 40-hour week and reduce those eligible for overtime; liberals want to make certain workers get paid overtime if they have to work more than 40 hours a week.
You can pick your side -- liberal or conservative, for change or for the status quo, for the poor or for the privileged. For me, I stand with Christ against Herod; Moses against the Pharaoh; the abolitionists against the slaveholders; King against the segregationists, the Suffragettes against the male politicians; the many against the few, and liberals against this crowd in the White House.
But whatever you choose, the next time Bush and Cheney rail about Kerry being too liberal, remember that America was a liberal idea from the start.
Double-barrelled Mega-PING! to both lists! If you want on, FReepmail me!
Yep. Jesus fed the hungry.
But, he didn't break down the neighbor's door and raid their kitchen to do it. He didn't rob people or threaten them with harm if they didn't contribute.
Yeah whatever. He also said that Mary was a single mother too.
Jesus ever leave a whole lot of these scattered about the country, illegitimate and unacknowledged, Jesse...?
No, no. Take as much time as you need. I'll wait.
Understaement of the Year Award,Sir.(sorry, no prize involved.Just bask in the glory)
So this is how Rev. Jackson's Bible reads: "When I was hungry, you taxed the populace to provide me with food stamps, when I was naked, you legislated tax incentives for people to give me their throw away clothing, and when I was sick and imprisoned, you sent your representative to visit me."
Jesus was the champion of the individual. Not only was the relationship with god a personal matter, but so were acts of charity and giving.
This is the largest pile of "Buffalo Chips" I have ever seen
This is such a tired argument. These people think that modern liberalism somehow relates to "Classical" liberalism of men like Thomas Jefferson.
"Determine never to be idle...It is wonderful how much may be done if we are always doing."
"I'm a great believer in luck, and I find the harder I work the more I have of it."
"Never fear the want of business. A man who qualifies himself well for his calling, never fails of employment."
"Never trouble another for what you can do for yourself."
"An honest man can feel no pleasure in the exercise of power over his fellow citizens."
--Thomas Jefferson
Does this sound like today's "liberals"??
Basically, by Reverend Larceny's reckoning, any change is good change and anyone who wants change is a liberal and that's all they need to know so that makes it good. Jughead.
--Boris
Here we go again.
Nowhere does Jesus advocate BIG GOVERNMENT SOCIALISM as do the 'liberals'.
Nowhere does Jesus advocate SEXUAL IMMORALITY as do the 'liberals'.
Either Jackson is ignorant or he is a cynical prevaricator.
He's beyond the pale. So much drivel...where does one begin?
sigh
"An honest man can feel no pleasure in the exercise of power over his fellow citizens."
I like that!
That's it.He's finally lost whatever infinitely small notion of a mind he had left.
My "blog-sister" LaShawn points out rabid, foaming at the mouth ravings by Jesse Jackson in a column in the Chicago Sun-Times this week that defies all logic, sense and reality by claiming that Jesus Christ was a liberal.
Think about it: A conservative Christian is a contradiction in terms. Christ wasn't a conservative. He fed the hungry simply because they were hungry. He didn't require that they go to work first. He healed the sick, simply because they were sick. He didn't push them into an insurance company, or let the drug companies gouge them on prices. Jesus was a liberal; Herod was the conservative.Though many would say he did it long ago, Jesse has not only jumped the shark, he's dragged it outta the water and beat it with a Louisville Slugger.Moses was the liberal; Pharaoh was the conservative. Abolitionists were liberals; slave owners were the conservatives. Mandela is a liberal; the South African apartheid leaders were the conservatives. That's why conservative Dick Cheney supported apartheid over Mandela, and approved of keeping Mandela in prison.
The Suffragettes were liberals; those who opposed the vote for women were conservatives. Martin Luther King was a liberal; the segregationists were conservatives. He wanted to end racial discrimination; they wanted to conserve it.
Last I checked, my Lord and Savior stayed outta politics. He is Lord of us all, liberal and conservative, Republican and Democrat, black and white, Jew and Gentile, logical and moonbat.
Jesse's analogies are nothing but partisan politics dragged into the pulpit. The pulpit ain't no place to drag this shark, Jesse. Give it up.
And to think Jesse Jackson puts Reverand in front of his name....what a "snake oil salesman" he is.
Jesus was not into politics, but he was he certainly would not vote for a candidate who endorses gay marriages, or abortions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.