Posted on 07/29/2004 7:58:27 AM PDT by SJackson
Prime Minister Ariel Sharon treats US President George W. Bush warmly, while his attitude toward Democratic candidate Senator John Kerry can be described as "cold", officials from Kerry's headquarters said.
Sharon's attitude toward the two may have an effect on the vote of US Jews in the coming November elections, officials told Army Radio Thursday morning.
Kerrry's people said that one example illustrating Sharon's "preference" is his avoiding meeting Kerry in the past. They added that vice premier Ehud Olmert, Sharon's right-hand man, had been quoted recently as saying, "Jews in America prefer Bush to Kerry."
An official at the Prime Minister's Office denied the allegations, saying that Kerry is welcome in Israel at any time and Sharon has not yet met him due to "technical reasons."
The Democratic Party on Wednesday nominated Kerry as their candidate in the presidential election scheduled for November 2.
Kerry won the primaries held earlier this year by a wide margin. The endorsement by the 4,500 delegates assembled in Boston for the party's convention was a mere formality.
Aides of Democratic candidate Senator John Kerry are complaining that the Israeli government is making clear its preference of President George W. Bush in the American election campaign. Israeli Ambassador to the United States Danny Ayalon told Kerry aides that Israel is "absolutely neutral."
Democratic Party sources said they do not appreciate the fact that American Jews visiting Israel hear from the prime minister and his aides overstated praise for Bush, Haaretz reported. The officials warned that the praise for Bush is being interpreted as hints to the Jews that they should vote for the incumbent president in the coming election.
The sources expressed their disappointment that Prime Minister Ariel Sharon failed to meet with Kerry during the prime minister's last trip to Washington. Sharon's staff cited "scheduling difficulties" as the reason that the two did not meet.
The sources also noted that Kerry's brother Cameron, a convert to Judaism of over twenty years, recently visited Israel and met with Sharon, but photographers were banned from recording the meeting.
In addition, the sources mentioned Deputy Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's comments to the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, in which he stated that he doesn't know who will win the election, but he preferred Bush.
According to the Haaretz report, most of the complaints are not coming directly from members of Kerry's team but rather from Jewish activists in the Democratic Party.
In response to the allegations, an official at the Prime Minister's Office said that Kerry is welcome in Israel at any time and Sharon has not yet met him due to "technical reasons," the Jerusalem Post reported.
Ayalon held talks yesterday with Kerry and made it clear to him that Israel is not interfering in the campaign, Israel Radio reported.
A senior advisor to Kerry, Susan Rice, said if Kerry is elected he will reinvigorate the Middle East peace process. She told Ayalon that Kerry sees Israel as an important ally, and that its security is important for U.S. security, the radio report said.
Sources close to Kerry, including former U.S. Ambassador to Israel Martin Indyk, said they expect a change in Israel's attitude toward Kerry once he is nominated this week, Haaretz reported.
Meanwhile, a panel at the Democratic National Convention was told that American Jews remain faithful and reliable supporters of the Democratic Party and seem poised to overwhelmingly back John Kerry in the Nov. 2 presidential election, Reuters reported. President Bush won only 19 percent of the Jewish vote in the 2000 elections.
Kerry: I will not try to impose a peace agreement The Democratic Party platform adopted on Tuesday said Jerusalem should remain the undivided capital of Israel, that Palestinian refugees had no right of return and that it was unrealistic to expect Israel to return to its 1949 borders - all positions espoused by Bush.
Kerry told Haaretz recently that the Jewish state had no one to negotiate with on the Palestinian side and that he would not try to impose a peace agreement if elected.
"It's up to Israel to negotiate peace, and it needs a partner to do it with and they don't have one yet," he said.
Kerry angered Israel supporters last October when he told an Arab-American group that an array of fences and walls Israel was building through occupied West Bank land was a "barrier to peace."
But Kerry criticized the UN General Assembly's resolution passed last week urging Israel to comply with the International Court of Justice's ruling that it should dismantle the security fence.
He said as president he would "stand up for Israel's security in the UN or any international organization."
"I want to express my deep disappointment at the resolution passed Tuesday by the UN General Assembly. Let us remember: Israel's fence is a legitimate response to terror that only exists in response to the wave of terror attacks against Israel. The fence has proven to be an important tool in Israel's fight against terrorism," Kerry said in a statement.
Well, the Rats can be sure that Arafat, bin Ladin, and that little weirdo in N. Korea are all for Kerry.
We can cross off Sharon as one of the foreign leaders who ran into Kerry at the Au Bon Pan.
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
After having stated time and again that lots of foreign leaders prefer John Kerry, it is disingenuous for the Kerry team to complain now that one foreign leader prefers George Bush.
Why, once again, are Israel's leaders on the dock for actions that -- by the accuser's own admission -- are taken by other foreign leaders throughout the world?
What the heck is this all about?
Are these amateurs under the impression that people HAVE to like him because he's the nominee for the DNC?
And isn't he the one whose always whispering in people's ears that behind closed doors unnamed leaders really want him?
I can't imagine why any Foreign Leader would be cold to a politician whose official position is "to hell with your country. Let the Islamo-Fascists drive it into the sea."
This is a great test for Kerry. Now he can show us how he will literally, formally approach the international community and beg for America to be allowed back in.
We can only hope. Jewish voting behavior is driven more by economic factors than foreign affairs.
George Bush might get 40-percent (on a good day.) In 2000, W got only 19-percent. (already posted summary)
I liked what I heard Mary Matlin say the other morning on Imus: Remind those 60+ percent that there was another national leader who brought a European country out of its economic woes, but neglected to focus on preserving and protecting God's Chosen People.
Russ
I don't think liberal US Jews like Sharon any better than Bush and doubt this will change much SJ.
Sharon is no fool, he knows Kerry is milquetoast and ineffective for Israel....not to mention the hard pro-Pali segment of the left.
hey dumbocraps, maybe putting Carter and Sharpton on stage wasn't such a good idea for getting Jewish support
It is very clever for Sharon's people to declare that they'll meet with Kerry in Israel.
Let Kerry visit the Knesset in Jerusalem, the Western Wall and the Security Fence. In that case, I would think that Israel's government would want to meet with him repeatedly and publicly, in front of cameras and microphones that capture his statements about Israel's security needs.
Wow, imagine that, a leader of a people under attack from islamo fundamentalists and arab terrorists is cold to a man who believes in appeasement? How dare he.
Meanwhile, pro-Aristede demonstrators are rallying for Kerry in Port-au-Prince.
Makes perfect sense.
You mean, Sharon wasn't one of the foreign leaders that Kerry said support HIM?
You're right, it won't.
I don't see what Kerry is complaining about.
When Sharon was meeting with GWB in Washington, he refused to meet with Kerry. That seems perfectly proper to me, he shouldn't appear to be injecting himself in the campaign. That's not a knock on Kerry. And he's indicated if Kerry visits Israel he'll meet him there, perfectly appropriate as well, both as a candidate and as a Senator.
I don't see anything for the Kerry campaign to complain about, other than your observation Sharon is no fool, he knows Kerry is milquetoast and ineffective for Israel....not to mention the hard pro-Pali segment of the left., which is unspoken. The Kerry campaign can't blame Sharon for the perception that he's milquetoast.
The statements he makes on the east side or the west side of the wall?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.