Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Man Exposes Self During Airport Screening
Associated Press ^ | Jul 14, 2004 | The Associated Press

Posted on 07/14/2004 2:08:05 PM PDT by TexasGreg

Man Exposes Self During Airport Screening Wed Jul 14, 9:07 AM ET

By The Associated Press

MINNEAPOLIS - Daryl Miller didn't make it through airport security because he couldn't keep his pants on.

Airport police said a security screener was waving a metal-detecting wand over Miller's pants area on Friday when Miller pulled his shorts down to his ankles. He wasn't wearing any underwear.

Miller then said, "There, how do you like your job," thus ending the screening, according to the police report. He was charged with indecent exposure and released on $300 bail.

"We've never had anybody do that before," said airport police Lt. Matt Christenson. "But it's not abnormal for people to become frustrated with the screening process."

Miller also became belligerent during the screening, Transportation Security Administration officers told police. One TSA employee also told police that Miller had a note inside a magazine in his bag with an expletive, and told a TSA employee "Oh yeah, it's for you" when asked who the note was directed at.

"This person exposed themself in a public area, a clear violation of the law, and we needed to take some action on that, otherwise everybody would be dropping their pants," Christenson said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: airport; airportsecurity; exposure; screening; security; tsa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
"Is that a gun in your pocket, or are you just having a good time?"
1 posted on 07/14/2004 2:08:11 PM PDT by TexasGreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TexasGreg

Water's cold....deep too!


2 posted on 07/14/2004 2:10:11 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGreg
LOL! The kind of thing we have all felt like doing from time to time!
Gutsy.... stupid, but gutsy.
3 posted on 07/14/2004 2:11:46 PM PDT by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGreg
Obvious response for the TSA screener: "Well, boys, looks like this guy knew he was going to be searched and really wants us to not look at him further. Must mean he's got something to hide. Time for a cavity search."
4 posted on 07/14/2004 2:12:31 PM PDT by NJ_gent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
Oh, it's not that deep...
5 posted on 07/14/2004 2:12:52 PM PDT by null and void (Middle East n. former name for the region commonly known as Oil Under Glass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexasGreg

Well maybe not stupid, but definately foolish.


6 posted on 07/14/2004 2:12:55 PM PDT by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGreg

BF Later.


7 posted on 07/14/2004 2:13:01 PM PDT by Lady Jag (Used to be sciencediet (AKA Tad Rad) but found the solution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGreg

The guy is a moron. But what business is it of the screener who a note is written to? In this case I assume the moron was mouthing off for a stupid intrusive question. Was the note a threat? It didn't say it was a threat.


8 posted on 07/14/2004 2:13:55 PM PDT by TXBubba (aka TXBubbette)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGreg

"This person exposed themself in a public area, a clear violation of the law, and we needed to take some action on that, otherwise everybody would be dropping their pants," Christenson said."

Uh, probably not.


9 posted on 07/14/2004 2:17:58 PM PDT by OneTimeLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGreg
"This person exposed themself in a public area, a clear violation of the law, and we needed to take some action on that, otherwise everybody would be dropping their pants," Christenson said.

Interesting to see the government opinion of the citizenry.....

"The only morality in this country is government-enforced morality."

10 posted on 07/14/2004 2:19:30 PM PDT by Onelifetogive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGreg

More comments here:

Airport Exposed: Man accused of dropping pants at security
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1170561/posts


11 posted on 07/14/2004 2:20:49 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGreg

I heard Pvt Lyndie England reached a plea bargain...and is now an airport screener at Dulles


12 posted on 07/14/2004 2:24:09 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy

LOL!! That really is funny.


13 posted on 07/14/2004 2:32:02 PM PDT by no dems (I obey whatever the voices in my wife's head tell me to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TexasGreg

Isn't this just a more efficient strip search of the type performed every day?


14 posted on 07/14/2004 2:32:40 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Mullahs swinging from lamp posts.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Police are investigating the possibility that the suspect, "Darryl Miller," might have furnished a false name, and are comparing his photograph with that of known sex offenders.


15 posted on 07/14/2004 2:42:00 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GrandEagle
He should have MOONED the agent as long as he had his pants down!
16 posted on 07/14/2004 2:44:14 PM PDT by albee (yes!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

That really is clever and funny. But, all joking aside: Is this consider a "sex offender" offense? Will he have to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life because of this stupid stunt?


17 posted on 07/14/2004 2:44:17 PM PDT by no dems (I obey whatever the voices in my wife's head tell me to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Don't know - that would be a matter of state law. But I'd call exposing oneself more than a stunt. It's seriously sick behavior.


18 posted on 07/14/2004 2:50:18 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Thanks ... I had done a search, but I suppose my search was too confined. Sorry for the duplication.


19 posted on 07/14/2004 3:01:42 PM PDT by TexasGreg ("Democrats Piss Me Off")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TexasGreg

Different headline, different source - hard to find if you hadn't already seen it. That's why I did an "additional comments" rather than an "already posted".


20 posted on 07/14/2004 3:10:57 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson