Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/14/2004 9:04:35 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: FairOpinion

GGG Ping.


2 posted on 07/14/2004 9:10:12 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
blood taken from descendants of the tsar, including Britain's Duke of Edinburgh, the consort of Queen Elizabeth II.

? descended from who? "THE Czar"? or a previous Czar?

So where is the family? hiding in Argentina?

3 posted on 07/14/2004 9:34:35 AM PDT by eccentric (aka baldwidow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *Gods, Graves, Glyphs; A.J.Armitage; abner; adam_az; AdmSmith; Alas Babylon!; albertp; ...
"July 14, 2004 — An American scientific team has disputed what was thought to be the definitive identification of the remains of the Russian royal family, executed by the Bolsheviks in 1918, London's Daily Telegraph said Monday."

PING

This is a "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" -- Archeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc. PING list.

Please FREEPMAIL me, if you want on or off this list.

I just got the list from farmfriend, so those of you who haven’t been pinged lately, please check the link above, where you can find the links to the more recent articles.

LOOKING FOR volunteer to take the ping list and the ping task over. I took it temporarily, to continue it, but I am becoming very busy and there may be days when I am not available. Please FReepmail me, if you would be interested. On the average it’s only a ping a day or so. (Some days more, then for a few days there may be nothing). In the meantime I’ll do it, but you may get some pings a little late.

4 posted on 07/14/2004 10:49:15 PM PDT by FairOpinion (If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
The original work on identifying the Czar and his family was based, as I remember, on the matching of skull to photographs, overlaying them and finding that they matched.

I don't remember whether there was actually any DNA tests performed before they were declared to be that of the Czar and his family.

Do you know ?

6 posted on 07/15/2004 1:00:31 PM PDT by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
The newspaper quoted Knight as saying, "we have uncovered irregularities and inconsistencies (and very strange goings-on) in the case," and that the results claimed by Gill were "essentially impossible." ...Knight conceded that he had carried out his research on behalf of the Russian Expert Commission Abroad, a group of scholars that disputes the conclusion that the bones found in Yekaterinburg in 1991 belonged to the royal family.
Fascinating, but not surprising. Slipshod work and fraud is endemic to genetic "studies".
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.

8 posted on 07/17/2004 2:51:35 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Unlike some people, I have a profile. Okay, maybe it's a little large...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
I guess Yekaterinburg must have lots of well-dressed corpses - with the imperial family's heirloom jewelry sewn into their underwear - scattered about town. DNA just couldn't be wrong.

Or conversely - could some assumptions of the British royals' lineage be in error?

9 posted on 07/17/2004 2:59:31 PM PDT by struwwelpeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson