Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

He's half right. Polygamy has been accepted by many cultures throughout history. If the United States is bent on legalizing gay marriages, then polygamy should also be legalized.

The half wrong part is marrying minors. I don't know the law in Utah regarding marrying 16 year olds. It is accepted in a number of states with the consent of the Court or parents of the minor.

1 posted on 07/03/2004 9:35:05 PM PDT by AUH2OY2K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: AUH2OY2K

That's right. Traditionally, having sex with a minor was not a problem IF the minor(s) in question was/were married.


2 posted on 07/03/2004 10:01:27 PM PDT by valkyrieanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AUH2OY2K
"The half wrong part is marrying minors."
Within the framework of his historical argument, it would not appear to present a problem:
Historically, in India, they even had child marriages one time. In medieval Europe, too, there were cases of marriages between 14yr olds (Henry II &Catherine Medici, in 1532). So, on his lines, it at least COULD be OK.
3 posted on 07/03/2004 10:11:06 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AUH2OY2K

Polygamy is about older men hiding behind religion to obtain very young, vulnerable women.


4 posted on 07/03/2004 10:28:56 PM PDT by tkathy (nihilism: absolute destructiveness toward the world at large and oneself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AUH2OY2K

And we all expected this after what the Mass SC did...and The USSC did with the Texas case....Don't be surprised if this guy wins with the gutless wonders in black robes


5 posted on 07/03/2004 11:17:26 PM PDT by jnarcus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AUH2OY2K

The penalty for having two wives: Two mothers-in-law.


6 posted on 07/03/2004 11:18:54 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (If it seems like a good idea, imagine it diabolically twisted in the hands of your worst enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AUH2OY2K

I think this is a good thing. The more they push gay marriage etc., these kind of lawsuits theoretically have the same wacko legitimacy. What say you Sandra Day?


10 posted on 07/04/2004 1:28:11 AM PDT by lainde (Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AUH2OY2K
According to 2001 World Almanac, in Utah, age of consent is 18..

Marriage With Parental Consent is, however, 16..

I think the question here is whether the girl herself gave consent, or was just "married off" to this guy..

Otherwise, the question of law seems to ride on the issue of polygamy, and nothing else..

12 posted on 07/04/2004 1:30:54 AM PDT by Drammach (Ripley... Last survivor of the Nostromo.... signing off....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AUH2OY2K

He's right. There's no constitutional objection to polygamy if gay marriage is legal. After all if some form of family union is permissable whose is to say any other kind is not? By supporting SSM, the Left has opened a Pandora's Box that can't be closed.


14 posted on 07/04/2004 1:47:20 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AUH2OY2K
He should have filed in Massachusetts.

Calling Judge Marshall (Mass, New York Times), .....

16 posted on 07/04/2004 3:15:53 AM PDT by Diogenesis (We do only what we are meant to do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AUH2OY2K

Wouldn't "the right to peaceably assemble" apply here?


17 posted on 07/04/2004 3:30:16 AM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AUH2OY2K

Bring'um young.....


18 posted on 07/04/2004 5:13:03 AM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AUH2OY2K

I forgot to add that the Pakistani polygamist immediately went on the dole, with all his wives and kids.


20 posted on 07/04/2004 5:20:15 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AUH2OY2K

TAKE IT ON SANDRA O'DEE! NOW THAT YOU SAID SODOMY IS KOSHER...HOW CAN YOU DISALLOW ANYTHING??? TELL US SANDRA O'DEE!!!


26 posted on 07/04/2004 11:45:51 PM PDT by montag813 ("A nation can survive fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AUH2OY2K; *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; ...
A WorldNetDaily article on the same subject states:

The appeal cites a U.S. Supreme Court ruling last year that struck down the sodomy convictions of two Houston men. A majority of the justices said a Texas anti-sodomy law violated the privacy rights of consenting adults.
Apparently the U.S. Supreme Court didn't fully consider the ramifications of their ruling. Or maybe they did...
36 posted on 07/05/2004 7:52:52 AM PDT by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AUH2OY2K

I see everything's right on schedule.

Anyone want to make bets on what's next: kids, corpses, or animals?


39 posted on 07/05/2004 9:52:00 AM PDT by Wampus SC (Paleosexual Chauvinist Pig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson