To: Hildy
My suspicion is that Nick Berg was a Michael Moore mole who was supposed to meet up with the "fun-loving" guys from al Qaeda and give Moore some good footage for his movie. Instead, Berg ended up on a spit, roasting over a fire.
3 posted on
06/27/2004 8:59:24 AM PDT by
Brilliant
To: Brilliant
Yep. Me too.
No proof he was a conservative over there for "business" purposes, and I suspect he was encouraged to get arrested by CIA for dramatic effect.
His dad is the only guy who quickly espoused his son's conservatism, and I thought that was bizarre. I've lost loves ones, and revealing their political lean isn't exactly the first thing that comes to mind when they die. Heck talking to the media wouldn't even occur to me.
To: Brilliant; Nita Nupress; cyncooper
My thoughts as well. Moore is unlikely to ever admit that, but I do hope it comes out SOMEHOW.
12 posted on
06/27/2004 9:09:37 AM PDT by
MizSterious
(First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
To: Brilliant
Hmmm. Interesting theory!
13 posted on
06/27/2004 9:11:17 AM PDT by
dawn53
To: Brilliant
I've heard things along those lines...
29 posted on
06/27/2004 9:41:27 AM PDT by
ApesForEvolution
("American islamocommunists" are not Americans. They live in some 'other America' & must b destroyed)
To: Brilliant
My suspicion is that Nick Berg was a Michael Moore mole who was supposed to meet up with the "fun-loving" guys from al Qaeda and give Moore some good footage for his movie. Instead, Berg ended up on a spit, roasting over a fire. And the suppressed 20 minutes of footage interviewing Berg that Moore had and gave to Berg's dad no doubt confirmed that. It more than likely showed him praising the Iraqi insurgents and condemning the American "occupation." Will Moore ever release this footage? No.
37 posted on
06/27/2004 9:49:00 AM PDT by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: Brilliant
that is interesting, could it be that Michael Moore in his pitched fever to produce his anti-bush infomercial (and it is a infomercial) is the one who is actually responsible for the putting Berg in harms way?
This is the question that should be asked. In fact where are the lawyers approaching Berg's father to file a suit against Moore for reckless endangerment? If his dad is really anti-corporation then he should have no problem suing moore.
To: Brilliant
My suspicion is that Nick Berg was a Michael Moore mole who was supposed to meet up with the "fun-loving" guys from al Qaeda and give Moore some good footage for his movie. Instead, Berg ended up on a spit, roasting over a fire. Hummm... Never thought of that.
And Nick reluctantly went after daddy's loving blessing.
To: Brilliant
Why doesn't Moore pick up his own film crew and go over for himself? If he is such a great filmmaker, why doesn't he shoot his own stuff? Is he afraid that some Islamo-facist is going to put him on a roasting spit. If he is, he has nothing to worry, Moore is so fat, he would break the spit.
Actually, Moore would and would be forced to film fact and not be so easily able to stage the lies.
116 posted on
06/27/2004 1:18:44 PM PDT by
jonrick46
(jonrick46)
To: Brilliant
That does seem to be a strange coincidence. Moore had video-taped an interview w/Nick Berg & Berg's dad was big in anti-Iraq movements.
To: Brilliant
When the whole truth comes out about Moore, and his subversive activities, he will be run out of the country on a rail.
Oh, waitaminute...do they make rails wide enough for him?
210 posted on
06/28/2004 8:07:32 PM PDT by
Palladin
(Proud to be a FReeper!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson