1 posted on
06/18/2004 6:37:25 PM PDT by
Pikamax
To: Pikamax
"."The people who are leading al-Qaida now seem a lot more professional group." Make that a lot more dead, after a few hours ago...
2 posted on
06/18/2004 6:41:31 PM PDT by
HolgerDansk
(Vikings: The Original Amphibious Warriors)
To: Pikamax
"It's going to take 10,000-15,000 dead Americans before we say to ourselves: 'What is going on'?" Oh really. For all the painting of Imperial Hubris, seems Anonymous would do better if he stopped hiding behind his false bravado and revealed his name.
3 posted on
06/18/2004 6:42:04 PM PDT by
rintense
(Screw justice. I want revenge.)
To: Pikamax
Howell Raines is probably "Anonymous."
4 posted on
06/18/2004 6:45:30 PM PDT by
Timmy
To: Pikamax
So this is an anonymous article by Anonymous from the Anonymous Intelligence Agency with permission from anonymous authorities to tell an anonymous story.
Either it's completely bogus, like deep throat, or that rat George Tenet approved it, which wouldn't surprise me a bit, the lousy clintonoid.
6 posted on
06/18/2004 6:55:59 PM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Pikamax; Mitchell; Allan; okie01
In an interview with the Guardian the official, who writes as "Anonymous", Just look at the list of Kerry foreign affairs advisers. Probably one of them.
7 posted on
06/18/2004 6:56:36 PM PDT by
Shermy
To: Pikamax
"Deep Anonymous" is really Bob Woodward.
8 posted on
06/18/2004 6:57:53 PM PDT by
AmericaUnited
(It's time someone says the emperor has no clothes.)
To: Pikamax
The tone of Imperial Hubris is certainly angry and urgent, and the stridency of his warnings about al-Qaida led him to be moved from a highly sensitive job in the late 90s. In other words, he hasn't been privy to the really "sensitive" data since well before 9/11.
9 posted on
06/18/2004 7:02:14 PM PDT by
wimpycat
("The road to the promised land runs past Sinai."-C.S. Lewis)
To: Pikamax
Is Julian Borger any relation to Gloria Borger? If so, it seems that they deserve each other.
If anyone watched "her" interview with VP Cheney last night, you will know what I'm talking about.
11 posted on
06/18/2004 7:04:42 PM PDT by
jackbill
To: Pikamax
Well surprise surprise someone else writes a bush bashing book praising our enemies as genious freedom fighters
I guess stupidity falls hand in hand with freedom of speach but these people are traitorous wreches deserving of a swift traitorous justice !
12 posted on
06/18/2004 7:05:05 PM PDT by
ATOMIC_PUNK
(‘All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.’ TJefferson)
To: Pikamax
The source is Bill W. from Alcoholics Anonymous. He always does this kind of thing when he falls off the wagon.
13 posted on
06/18/2004 7:06:35 PM PDT by
WorkingClassFilth
(Back to an old favorite: DEFUND NPR & PBS - THE AMERICAN PRAVDA)
To: Pikamax
This one is unprecedented in being the work of a serving official with nearly 20 years experience in counter-terrorism who is still part of the intelligence establishment....... and is a cowardly piece of shit.
FMCDH(BITS)
17 posted on
06/18/2004 7:49:27 PM PDT by
nothingnew
(KERRY: "If at first you don't deceive, lie, lie again!")
To: Pikamax
To: Pikamax
The White House has yet to comment publicly on Imperial Hubris, which is due to be published on July 4, but intelligence experts say it may try to catch bin Laden and drag him through the streets just as this B.S. book hits the shelves.
19 posted on
06/18/2004 9:24:33 PM PDT by
JohnnyZ
(Yes, I do think I'm funny, why do you ask?)
To: Pikamax; All
After I read this column the first thing that came to mind was: Are there still people who try and use the old "reverse psychology" thing, as in, everybody knows terrorists want Kerry to be president BUT if somebody says, terrorist want Bush, etc, etc, etc.
If the author of this book is any indication of the caliber of our intelligence officers, it's no wonder we're in the straits we're in.
To: Pikamax
Hmmm ex-intelligence official, disgruntled employee, know-it-all tone...this is Richard Clarke, isn't it?
No fair double-dibbing in the Bush bashing. Let someone else take a turn telling us how much better off we'd be if only we'd listen to him.
22 posted on
06/19/2004 4:37:34 AM PDT by
Hostile
(Freedom is not the sole prerogative of a chosen few; it is the universal right of all God's children)
To: Pikamax
>The tone of Imperial Hubris is certainly angry and urgent
If this book is true --
if large numbers of black ops
people are upset --
this could be awful.
These particular people
could vent their anger
using their talents
directly against the Feds,
or by providing
an "opening" for
the bad guys to strike the Feds.
Interesting times . . .
To: Pikamax
But Vincent Cannistraro, a former chief of operations at the CIA counter-terrorism centre, said he had been vindicated by events. "He is very well respected, and looked on as a serious student of the subject." 1984 -1987 : (US : CANNISTRARO IS DIRECTOR OF NSC INTELLIGENCE) Who is Vincent Cannistraro? Director of NSC Intelligence from 1984 to 1987, Vincent Cannistraro went on to serve as chief of operations for the CIA's Counterterrorism Center and to lead the CIA's investigation into the bombing of Pan Am 103.
47 posted on 09/30/2003 3:21 PM PDT by aristeides
24 posted on
10/09/2004 7:54:20 PM PDT by
piasa
(Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
To: Pikamax
27 posted on
11/11/2004 4:40:30 PM PST by
mrsmith
("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice.. NOT Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson