Posted on 06/04/2004 12:27:14 AM PDT by kattracks
Oh no, no, no...........he HAS to run for NY Senate in 2006. He's the only hope for unseating "big seat".
Giuliani would make a great AG. Rplacing Ashcroft would be a good political move, too, imho.
Woolsey.
2 Reasons.
One, he advocates Iraqi/AQ connections.
Two, He was confirmed by a dem senate for a dem president.
Tose two things would drive the obstructionists INSANE.
You're probably right, but its too bad 'cause Rudy's the one best hope for New Yorkers & the entire nation to be rid of Shrillery once & for all. Slamdunk her senate re-election bid & she'd be shut out of a run for the White House for good.
I read somewhere that Ashcroft is rumored to be leaving after the elction. Rudy would be more suited to AG than CIA Director. However, I hope he stays out of it all and runs against Hillary in 2006.
We've already had one glad-handing, back-slapping, a$$-kissing political hack put there by the King of All Sinks. Once is enough.
Yes but .. the CIA is your spy agency .. I really don't think they need a front man.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.