Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

German Discovery! Condoms Cause Cancer!
Deutsche Welle ^ | 29 May 2004 | DW

Posted on 05/29/2004 10:12:54 PM PDT by pepsionice

A German scientific research institute has warned that most condoms on the market contain a cancer-causing chemical and has urged that their manufacture be subjected to stringent quality control.

The Chemical and Veterinary Investigation Institute in Stuttgart said on Friday it had found the carcinogen N-Nitrosamine in 29 of 32 types of condoms it tested in simulated conditions.

The condoms, which were kept in a solution with artificial sweat, exuded huge amounts of cancer-causing N-Nitrosamine from its rubber coating. Researchers measured amounts of N-Nitrosamine, that were way above the prescribed limits for other rubber products such as baby pacifiers.

"N-Nitrosamine is one of the most carcinogenic substances," the study's authors said. "There is a pressing need for manufacturers to tackle this problem."

The study said that the carcinogen is thought to be present in a substance used to improve condom elasticity. When the rubber material comes in contact with human bodily fluids, it can release traces of N-Nitrosamine.

But since there are no prescribed limits of N-Nitrosamine for condoms, the study hasn't caused panic among manufacturers or mass-recalling of the products from counters.

Local government officials said condom users should not stop using rubber contraceptives based on the results of the study because N-Nitrosamine does not present an immediate health risk.

The Baden-Würtemmberg Social Ministry said it didn't think "it posed a risk." Authorities are also withholding the name of the affected manufacturers for fear of litigation.

Germany's Federal Institute for Risk Assessment said that daily condom use exposed users to N-Nitrosamine levels up to three times higher than levels naturally present in food.

Werner Altkofer, head of the Stuttgart-based Chemical and Veterinary Investigation Institute said that though the production of rubber usually uses chemicals that can exude N-Nitrosamine, condom manufacturers could bypass it by using more expensive alternative substances available on the market that didn't form the carcinogen.

"We believe that it's up to the manufacturers to use other production processes so that no N-Nitrosamine is formed in condoms," Altkofer said.

He added that the latter was technically possible going by the fact that products of some manufacturers didn't show traces of the carcinogen during the testing.


TOPICS: Germany
KEYWORDS: carcinogens; condoms; germany
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
If we can put a man on the moon....can't we build a safe condom?
1 posted on 05/29/2004 10:12:54 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

LOL - sounds more like a guy who wants an excuse not to use a condom.


2 posted on 05/29/2004 10:16:28 PM PDT by mombonn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
Hmmm..., let's see... use a condom and leave no progeny (thus ensuring the deletion of your DNA from the human gene pool)plus get cancer of the prazzoo.

Glad I had six kids....

3 posted on 05/29/2004 10:23:24 PM PDT by freebilly (Vote Kerry-- 1 Billion Muslims Can't Be Wrong....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

I wonder just how bad of a carcinogen the compound is


4 posted on 05/29/2004 10:27:05 PM PDT by Gid_29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
Does it cause cancer in the man or the woman?

If they wanted to take up a collection a lot of guys would contribute to this research.

5 posted on 05/29/2004 10:29:09 PM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp IV

"Safe Sex" ping...


6 posted on 05/29/2004 10:29:33 PM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian (We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
The condoms, which were kept in a solution with artificial sweat, exuded huge amounts of cancer-causing N-Nitrosamine from its rubber coating. Researchers measured amounts of N-Nitrosamine, that were way above the prescribed limits for other rubber products such as baby pacifiers.

Huge amounts! Huge! That's, like, scientific for 1.257e13 times the lethal dosage per square kilogram of body weight, or something like that. Thank gosh we have science reporters to dumb it down for us!

Anyway, the lesson here is obvious. Do not soak your condoms in solution of human sweat and consume orally. Also, do not use condoms as baby pacifiers. Find something else to do with them. I've seen them blown up and made into balloon animals.

7 posted on 05/29/2004 10:47:12 PM PDT by Caesar Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

And socks cause hemehroids, right?


8 posted on 05/29/2004 11:41:13 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly
"...get cancer of the prazzoo..."

I'm an old fart, billy, but the 'prazzoo' is a new one on me! Way-to-go, pal...

....................FRegards
9 posted on 05/29/2004 11:51:28 PM PDT by gonzo (You're WHAT???? Call 1-800-BAS-TARD, and don't call me again!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

Hmmm... AIDS OR CANCER..... such a dilemma. It appears the cancer risk is much lower than the sexually transmitted diseases one could be exposed to.


10 posted on 05/30/2004 12:03:13 AM PDT by Cate (Bush is da' man...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cate

Dihydrogen Monoxide alert.


Junk Science.

Memorial day slow news days.


11 posted on 05/30/2004 12:15:19 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
The Chemical and Veterinary Investigation Institute in Stuttgart

Because there's nothing as fun as hyping up a bunch of cats with catnip and dropping them in a room full of deadly chemicals.

12 posted on 05/30/2004 12:21:50 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Memorial day slow news days.

Yup- this was a teaser for last night's late news. Kind-of like the shampoo makes you stupid news from last week.

13 posted on 05/30/2004 1:02:21 AM PDT by conservative cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Gid_29
"I wonder just how bad of a carcinogen the compound is"
N-nitrosamines (a class of compounds) are nitrosating agents, and nitrosate DNA, leading to mutations and cancer. Sodium nitrite (used to cure meat), can do the same thing inside your stomach. But how much cured meats does one have to eat before serious risk of stomach cancer?- a lot, and the same applies here. Nitrosamines are "moderately" bad, depending on molecular weight - the lighter the worse [the lightest ones, like dimethylnitrosamine - intermediate in rocket fuel manufacture - are really bad], but consider this - millions of men have been using the stuff on and off (pun intended) or even continuously (another pun, also intended) and how many of them came down with localized skin cancer?- very few. Therefore enjoy yourself and continue using prophylactics as necessary.
14 posted on 05/30/2004 1:33:58 AM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

Wonder if this substance is more likely to cause cancer in men or in women, or if that is even known.


15 posted on 05/30/2004 1:46:27 AM PDT by GretchenM (No military in the history of the world has fought so hard and so often for the freedom of others.-W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caesar Soze

As a professional chemist, I can assure you: urea solution would slowly react with N-nitrosamines. And urea occurs naturally right where needed...


16 posted on 05/30/2004 1:54:22 AM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

EXTRACTION OF N-NITROSAMINE
(N-NITROSOPYRROLIDINE) FROM BACON

yeah and stop eating your bacon.

http://www.jtbaker.com/techlib/documents/ff-009.html


17 posted on 05/30/2004 4:27:09 AM PDT by Flavius ("... we should reconnoitre assiduosly... " Vegetius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: gonzo
but the 'prazzoo' is a new one on me

I'm an old fart, myself, and there are times that I wish the prazzoo was a new one on me, too.

I should actually read some of the spam I get. I think I can get a new one chemically these days....

18 posted on 05/30/2004 6:32:00 AM PDT by freebilly (Vote Kerry-- 1 Billion Muslims Can't Be Wrong....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
yeah and stop eating your bacon

Well, maybe people shouldn't be making the bacon....

19 posted on 05/30/2004 6:33:17 AM PDT by freebilly (Vote Kerry-- 1 Billion Muslims Can't Be Wrong....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

Good news for the lads in San Francisco, Palm Springs and Key West bump!


20 posted on 05/30/2004 6:39:35 AM PDT by ErnBatavia (Democrats assume Republicans lie as much as they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson