Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

As long as a man has another cartridge or hand weapon to use, he does not yield
Enter Stage Right ^ | August 1998 | Vin Suprynowicz

Posted on 05/24/2004 12:19:43 PM PDT by 45Auto

Those who would blithely abandon the greatest safeguard of liberty -- the right of the individual citizen to keep and bear military-style arms -- aren't real strong on consistency.

Aiming to gradually erode the quality of arms we have "permission" to bear -- back to the level of the muzzle-loading flintlock, if not the slingshot -- they have been disingenuously mewing for 60 years that they have no objection to arms "for which there is a legitimate sporting use."

Of course, the Constitution says nothing about hunting or skeet shooting. Rather, it says we must be allowed to keep our arms -- no "infringement" whatsoever, no tax, no registration, no "application for permit" -- because the citizens constitute the militia, the most powerful armed force in any free state.

The gun-grabbers sneer that this is an out-of-date notion, that a bunch of farmers with deer rifles could hardly stand up to the 82nd Airborne ... let along a Chinese invasion.

But the logical conclusion of that argument is surely that we should encourage law-abiding citizens to keep machine guns and rocket-launchers in the closet ... not ban AK-47s, with or without pistol grips and bayonet lugs.

The victim disarmament extremists (those who would disarm law-abiding rape victims, but not their assailants, who ignore all such laws) ridicule this as the sheerest homicidal macho fantasy -- no modern nation has ever thrown out a tyrant by the simple expedient of the common folk rising up with their personal rifles, nor does any civilized nation today allow its citizens to keep machine guns at home.

Wrong and wrong. Try placing a long-distance call to the American military governor of Vietnam, or the Soviet military governor of Afghanistan, to ask them how easy it was to suppress a nation of armed peasants.

And as to the advisability of "allowing" citizen militias to keep modern military arms with them at home -- yes, Sarah, the kind "designed for no purpose but to kill large numbers of people" -- we turn to Virginia attorney and Second Amendment expert Stephen P. Halbrook, author of the new book "Target Switzerland: Swiss Armed Neutrality in World War II," out this past spring from Sarpedon Press.

Writing in the January 1998 edition of the excellent magazine Chronicles, Mr. Halbrook points out that "Since the origins of the Swiss Confederation in 1291, it has been the duty of every male Swiss citizen to be armed and to serve in the militia. Today, that arm is an 'assault rifle,' which is issued to every Swiss male and which must be kept in the home. During Germany's Third Reich (1933-1945), that arm was a bolt-action repeating rifle, which was highly effective in the hands of Switzerland's many sharpshooters.

"Americans of the wartime generation were familiar with the fact that brave and armed little Switzerland stood up to Hitler and made him blink. As a map of Europe in 1942 shows, the Nazis had swallowed up most of everything on the continent but this tiny speck that Hitler called 'a pimple on the face of Europe.' The Fuhrer boasted that he would be 'the butcher of the Swiss,' but the Wehrmacht was dissuaded by a fully armed populace in the Alpine terrain. ...

"The Swiss federal shooting festival, which remains the largest rifle competition in the world, was held in Luzern in June 1939. Hitler's takeover of Austria and Czechoslovakia was complete, both countries had been surrendered by tiny political elites who guaranteed that there would be no resistance. Swiss President Philipp Etter spoke at the festival, stressing that something far more serious than sport was the purpose of their activity. His comments demonstrated the connection between national defense and the armed citizen:

" 'There is probably no other country that, like Switzerland, gives the soldier his weapon to keep in the home. The Swiss always has his rifle at hand. It belongs to the furnishings of his home. ... That corresponds to ancient Swiss tradition. As the citizen with his sword steps into the ring in the cantons which have the Landsgemeinde (government by public meeting), so the Swiss soldier lives in constant companionship with his rifle. He knows what that means. With this rifle, he is liable every hour, if the country calls, to defend his hearth, his home, his family, his birthplace. The weapon is to him a pledge and sign of honor and freedom. The Swiss does not part with his rifle.'

Mr. Halbrook continues: "On September 1, 1939, Hitler launched World War II by attacking Poland. Within a day or two, Switzerland had about half a million militiamen mobilized out of a population of just over four million. General Henri Cuisan, commander in chief of the Swiss militia, responded with Operations Order No. 2:

" 'At the border and between the border and army position, the border troops and advance guard persistently delay the advance of the enemy. The garrisons at the border and between the border and the works and positions making up the defensive front continue resistance up to the last cartridge, even if they find themselves completely alone.'

"This astonishing order was the opposite of the policies of the other European countries, which either surrendered to Hitler without a fight or surrendered after a brief resistance. For example, in April 1940, Denmark's king surrendered the country after a meeting with the Nazis and instructed his forces not to resist. Norway resisted, although 'unlike Switzerland' it had no armed populace and was ill- prepared for combat.

"In response to the invasions of small neutral countries, Switzerland issued its 'directions concerning the conduct of the soldiers not under arms in event of attack.' Intended as a warning to Germany, it was pasted on walls all over the country. It prescribed the reaction against surprise attack and against the fifth column as follows:

" 'All soldiers and those with them are to attack with ruthlessness parachutists, airborne infantry and saboteurs. Where no officers and noncommissioned officers are present, each soldier acts under exertion of all powers of his own initiative.'

"This command for the individual to act on his own initiative was an ancient Swiss tradition which reflected the political and military leadership's staunch confidence in the ordinary man. This command was possible, of course, only in a society where every man had his rifle at home.

" 'Under no condition,' the order continued, 'would any surrender be forthcoming, and any pretense of a surrender must be ignored: If by radio, leaflets or other media any information is transmitted doubting the will of the Federal Council or of the Army High Command to resist an attacker. this information must be regarded as the lies of enemy propaganda. Our country will resist aggression with all means in its power and to the death.' ...

"France collapsed in June, 1940 after only a few weeks of fighting. Paris was taken without a shot being fired. The Nazis promptly proclaimed the death penalty for possession of firearms in France and other occupied countries.

"In contrast, Cuisan recalled the high duty of the soldier to resist:

" 'Everywhere, where the order is to hold, it is the duty of conscience of each fighter, even if he depends on himself alone, to fight at his assigned position. The riflemen, if overtaken or surrounded, fight in their position until no more ammunition exists. Then cold steel is next. ... The machine gunners, the cannoneers of heavy weapons, the artillerymen, if in the bunker or on the field, do not abandon or destroy their weapons, or allow the enemy to seize them. Then the crews fight further like riflemen. As long as a man has another cartridge or hand weapons to use, he does not yield. ..."

Even old men and children were issued armbands, identifying them as Ortswehren (local defense) so they could not be shot as partisans under international law, when the time came for them to shoot any invader they saw.

Hitler never invaded Switzerland. Would you have?

Nor has any dictator -- military or otherwise -- ever attempted to rule the Swiss cantons by "executive order" ... like the one Bill Clinton haughtily signed to outlaw the import of AK-47 variants which his own ATF had found to be in full compliance with current law.

"There was no holocaust on Swiss soil," Mr. Halbrook concludes. "Swiss Jews served in the militia side by side with their fellow citizens, and kept rifles in their homes just like everyone else. It is hard to believe that there could have been a holocaust had the Jews of Germany, Poland, and France had the same privilege."

Vin Suprynowicz is the assistant editorial page editor of the Las Vegas Review-Journal. Readers may contact him via e-mail at vin@lvrj.com. The web site for the Suprynowicz column is at http://www.nguworld.com/vindex/. The column is syndicated in the United States and Canada via Mountain Media Syndications, P.O. Box 4422, Las Vegas Nev. 89127.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; rkba
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

1 posted on 05/24/2004 12:19:45 PM PDT by 45Auto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 45Auto

Good One.


2 posted on 05/24/2004 12:26:19 PM PDT by Redcoat LI (You Can Trust Me , I'm Not Like The Others.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto

The vote isn't worth a damn towards keeping a nation free, unless the citizens are also personally armed!


3 posted on 05/24/2004 12:26:37 PM PDT by RAY (They that do right are all heroes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
The authors of the 2nd amendment wisely foresaw the possibility that a day would come when the government would distort the clear truth and fear an armed citizenry.

That day has come, at least on the Democratic side of the aisle. Thus, the true purpose of the 2nd amendment may someday make itself clear to all sides.

When a car is about to run over you, it doesn't care if you understand its purpose. Likewise the 2nd amendment doesn't care if liberals understand its purpose. It may never be universally understood until the day it performs its function.

4 posted on 05/24/2004 12:29:46 PM PDT by Sender (To know what is right and not do it is the worst cowardice. -Confucius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
Good read. Thanks

We won't be seeing this taught in our "history" classes.

5 posted on 05/24/2004 12:30:52 PM PDT by G.Mason (A President is best judged by the enemies he makes when he has really hit his stride…Max Lerner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto

The whole purpose of the RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS is to OVERTHROW THE GOVERNMENT!

Liberal Gun Grabbers usually have a case of the vapors when you hit them with that statement.
Most just yell louder..........


6 posted on 05/24/2004 12:31:19 PM PDT by Red Badger (God is love..............ISLAM IS NOT!.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
It is hard to believe that there could have been a holocaust had the Jews of Germany, Poland, and France had the same privilege.

The Kurds have always been armed to the teeth. Didn't stop them from being massacred by Saddam.

7 posted on 05/24/2004 12:32:41 PM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RAY
"it says we MUST be allowed to keep our arms -- no "infringement" whatsoever, no tax, no registration, no "application for permit" -- because the citizens constitute the militia, the most powerful armed force in any free state."

"must be allowed" - actually, it says that we are absolutely to have weapons of war, there is no "allowed" about it because giovernment is simply and clearly denied authority to regulate gun ownership and transfer in any way.

8 posted on 05/24/2004 12:33:01 PM PDT by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
"... The whole purpose of the RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS is to OVERTHROW THE GOVERNMENT!"

Not quite.

It's to protect and defend the Bill of Rights against all enemies, foreign and domestic -- even if those enemies turn out to be the government.

9 posted on 05/24/2004 12:34:45 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto

"But the logical conclusion of that argument is surely that we should encourage law-abiding citizens to keep machine guns and rocket-launchers in the closet ... not ban AK-47s, with or without pistol grips and bayonet lugs."

YEAH, look what a few persons with the right weapons can do to hold off 180,000 US troops in Iraq. Drawing the same analogy, the US would be impregnable.


10 posted on 05/24/2004 12:36:15 PM PDT by ampat (to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sender
It may never be universally understood until the day it performs its function.

I think the worst liberal bastards DO understand it; that is why they don't want an armed citizenry - it might interfere with their agenda to turn us all into little tax slaves - come to think of it, we already are tax slaves.

11 posted on 05/24/2004 12:36:33 PM PDT by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The KG9 Kid

Rightly said, but in today's world we have only two enemies, Them and US........


12 posted on 05/24/2004 12:39:34 PM PDT by Red Badger (God is love..............ISLAM IS NOT!.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto

Has Klinton's unconstitutional and illegal "executive order", relating to the importation of AK clones, been rescinded?


13 posted on 05/24/2004 12:40:31 PM PDT by Bedford Forrest (Roger, Contact, Judy, Out. Fox One. Splash one.<I>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Ping


14 posted on 05/24/2004 12:42:45 PM PDT by Born Conservative (It really sucks when your 15 minutes of fame comes AFTER you're gone...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
"The Kurds have always been armed to the teeth. Didn't stop them from being massacred by Saddam."

But the Kurds reportedly went down fighting, gave as good or better than they got, and took more than a few Iraqi troops out of battles present and future.

And they died like men......

15 posted on 05/24/2004 12:48:07 PM PDT by tracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto; *bang_list

Good Post..


16 posted on 05/24/2004 12:49:06 PM PDT by Drammach (Freedom.... not just a job, ... It's An Adventure!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Liberal Gun Grabbers usually have a case of the vapors when you hit them with that statement. Most just yell louder...

There are Liberals, and then there are Leftists.

Liberals are "useful idiots", taught to feel and react; never to think. They unquestioningly believe that gun control is for the safety of children and society. They also do not understand the Second Amendment, and lack the capacity for rational analysis to do so.

Leftists, on the other hand, know exactly the purpose of the Second Amendment -- which is why they are working so hard to destroy it.

17 posted on 05/24/2004 12:52:17 PM PDT by SpyGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto; StriperSniper; Mo1; Peach; Howlin; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; RandallFlagg; ...
RKBA PING......................

18 posted on 05/24/2004 12:52:29 PM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
I've never complained much about being taxed as long as two things were true:

1- the tax money is being used for my benefit and the benefit of other Americans
2- the government otherwise leaves us alone in freedom as long as we are not harming others

I guess 1. is partially true and 2. is not looking too good.

19 posted on 05/24/2004 12:55:01 PM PDT by Sender (To know what is right and not do it is the worst cowardice. -Confucius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ampat
The principle of "leveraging" applies in a more vital way than it does in finance.

A brick, baseball bat, knife, or skillful hand can "liberate " a sidearm or rifle from a single sentry or other soldier.

Those can be used to obtain grenades, mortars, machine guns, which in turn can be used to acquire vehicles, tanks, and artillery, buildings, aircraft, ammo dumps, food, and defectors -- not to mention enemy corpses.

Such is borne out by many years of history -- and you know what "they" say about history................

20 posted on 05/24/2004 12:55:23 PM PDT by tracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson