Posted on 05/17/2004 11:28:48 AM PDT by jmstein7
Here is the misleading CNN headline:
BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- A U.S.-led coalition convoy in Iraq found sarin gas in an artillery round rigged as an improvised explosive device, Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt said Monday.
They are REFUSING to call them what they are -- WMD! This is an outrage.
Please contact CNN here and tell them to be honest, for once, call WMD WMD, and stop shilling for the Democrats!
Here is the FoxNews version.
If you have time, here is more contact info for CNN:
CNN
www.cnn.com
eason.jordan@turner.com
tom.johnson@turner.com
rick.davis@turner.com
gerald.levin@twi.com
community@cnn.com
http://www.cnn.com/feedback/
1 CNN Center
POB 105366
Atlanta, GA 30348
Phone: (404) 827-1500, (404) 827-1519
Fax: (404) 827-1593, (404) 827-1784
Now, go get 'em!!!
BUMP!
The bottom line is that the media has already determined that there are no WMDs in Iraq and there never will be.
Wont be big news until some poor soldier or marine get injured or dies from a chemical attack.
Then it will be quagmire quagmire quagmire....
bump for later
CNN Viewer response and News tip line is
404-827-0234
You have a choice of leaving message or talking to a DNC employee.
I usually call tothe news tip line. Maybe they haven't learned the news because they are not watching FOX.
Hans Blix says it's not a sign of WMD. Nothing to see here.
The method of delivery accompanied by a deadly chemical/biological agent are what make a WMD. In this instance the delivery would not and did not result in mass destruction.
Bump!
Well, at least they didn't refer to it as pesticide.
Of course they are WMD.
The headline is accurate. The news is big, so if anyone doesn't know sarin is WMD within a very short time, they don't wanna know.
LOL.
You've really got to admire the chutzpah of these guys. Bill Clinton taught them well with "It all depends on what the meaning of the word "is" is.
It all depends on what the meaning of "sex" is.
It all depends on what the meaning of "marriage" is.
It all depends on what the meaning of "campaign" is.
It all depends on what the meaning of "finance reform" is.
It all depends on what the meaning of "vote" is.
It all depends on what the meaning of "tolerance" is.
On and on and on....
Until Hans Blix sticks his head into one of these shells, and chokes to death in front of worldwide TV cameras... the world won't believe the obvious. Then, the world will choke on the horror of it all... the reality that they REALLY did exist. And then the final hurrah... George W Bush was RIGHT after all. Kind of makes you grin on just one tiny little result of this... it would make Moore's attempt to take a swipe at the prez, a big swing and a miss! It's a shame.:)
Went and got 'em.
They figure it's just another Bush lie !< /sarcasm >
When this news came out this AM the CNN news-anchorette-idiot was Darrin Kagen: she was outright despondent about the news akin to similar, previous performances on related matters by Katie Couric. Kagen asked the military attache she was interviewing, in a most despondent & worried / disappointed tone, "it's reported that these shells were not marked so there's no way it can be proved these came from Iraq, is there, I mean, it's more likely they were brought into Iraq from Iran or Syria, right?" - the ignorance & bias was so blatant as to border on the absurd.
Fox's headline
"Chemical Weapons Found in Iraq"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.